Lecture 19 - Cohort Studies Flashcards
What is the more common type of cohort study?
- observational study where individuals are grouped based from exposure status
- useful for rare exposures
- generates a risk ratio
What type of ratio is a cohort study most useful in generating?
-risk ratio
What is the type of cohort study that is not based on initial group allocation?
- starts with a “cohort” of people that have something in common
- initial grouping can be with regards to either exposure OR disease status
Differentiate between prospective, retrospective, and ambidirectional cohort study designs.
Prospective:
-separate by exposure status and then follow groups to assess for outcomes
Retrospective:
- exposure status and disease status are already known
- groups are separated by exposure status and then assessed looked at for disease status
Ambidirectional:
-uses retrospective design but then follows groups for further data
What are examples of different types of cohorts?
Birth cohort:
-commonality of being born in the same region around the same time
Inception cohort:
-common factor such as where people live or work
Exposure cohort:
-common exposure
What ways do membership in cohort studies change over time?
Slide 22
Fixed:
-can’t gain members but can lose them to follow up
Closed:
-can’t gain members and does not lose members to follow up
Open (Dynamic):
-can gain and lose members
What sources are available to pick unexposed individuals from?
Internal (best):
- from the same “cohort” as exposed but are not exposed themselves
- could also be the least exposed if there is nobody unexposed in the cohort
General population:
-unexposed or least exposed from the general population the exposed were taken from
Comparison (worst):
- match unexposed with exposed based off personal characteristics
- doesn’t control for other variable which may cause disease
What are strengths of cohort studies? (6)
- good for assessing multiple outcomes of one exposure
- useful for rare exposures
- useful for producing risk ratios
- less expensive than interventional
- good for long induction/latency periods (retrospective)
- can represent temporality (prospective)
What are some weaknesses of cohort studies? (6)
- can’t demonstrate causation
- difficult to control for other exposures or changes in exposure (primarily retrospective)
- not good for long induction/latent periods (prospective)
- can be impacted by unexpected confounders
- can be impacted by biases
- limited by available data
What are advantages of prospective cohort studies? (5)
Slide 30
- more control over data collection process
- follow-up is easier
- better answers temporality
- can look at multiple outcomes from a single exposure
- can produce incidence rates
What are disadvantages of prospective cohort studies? (6)
Slide 31
- time consuming
- expensive
- lost to follow up
- not useful for rare diseases
- not suitable for long induction/latency periods
- degree of exposure can change (not controlled for)
What are advantages of retrospective cohort studies? (4)
Slide 33
- useful for long induction/latency periods
- useful in rare diseases
- useful if data is already collected
- less expensive and time consuming (compared to prospective)
What are the disadvantages of a retrospective cohort study? (5)
(Slide 34)
- requires access to data
- resources might not contain all desired information
- no control for other exposures
- can be difficult to follow-up on patients
- exposure may have changed
What are common biases with cohort studies?
Slide 36
- healthy worker bias
- selection bias