Lecture 17: Conflict in Relationships Flashcards

1
Q

Most Common Topics of Conflict in Marriages

A
  • Children; differences in parenting, styles discipline, childcare duties.
  • Chores (Who does what)
  • Money (Spending wages, bills, etc)
  • Free time (Spending together versus activities)
  • Communication (Spouse not listening, understanding)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Four Horesmen: John Gottman

A

Reactions to conflict: Criticism, Contempt, Defensiveness, Stonewalling

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Four Horesmen: Criticism

A
  • Attacking partner’s personality and character.
  • “Kitchen-sinking” - when arguing with someone, they throw everything but the kitchen sink.
  • E.g., “you do this, oh and this, oh and
    also this.. And this.”
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Four Horesmen: Contempt

A
  • Trying to insult or psychologically abuse partner.
  • Name-calling, sarcasm; mocking can also be nonverbal (eye rolling).
  • Intent is to hurt partner (can be unconscious).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Four Horesmen: Defensiveness

A
  • Seeing self as victim.
  • Cross-complaining: firing back at partners complaint “you do this.. Well you do this.”
  • Yes-butting.
    -Mind-reading (e.g., “I know now you think.”)
  • Rubber man/woman (e.g., “I’m rude - YOU’RE rude!”
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Four Horesmen: Stonewalling

A
  • When couples stop communicating with each other.
  • Stony silence, removing self physically.
  • Withdrawl: Putting up a stone wall between you and partner.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Demand/Withdraw Pattern

A

Created by stonewalling. When stonewalling occurs, people fall into two different roles: withdrawer or demander.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Demander

A

Person criticizes, nags, makes demands.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Withdrawer

A
  • Avoids confrontation, withdraws, becomes defensive.
  • Strong link to gender: woman usually demand her, men usually withdrawer.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Gender and demand/withdrawl: Sociostructural Account

A
  • Women are more likely than men to ask their partner to change.
  • Women are often thrust in to the demander role and men respond with withdrawl.
  • Historically, women express closeness, do chores, take care of children.
  • Now that society is changing, women ask men to do more house work, etc.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Gender and demand/withdrawl: Physiological Account

A
  • Men tend to get more aroused by conflict with their partners and tend to withdraw to regulate this arousal.
  • Men get angrier and try to regulate emotions by shutting down.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Resolving Conflict: Destructive to Constructive

A
  • Separation: withdrawl of one or both partners without conflict being resolved.
  • Domination: one partner continues to pursue his or her goals, while the other gives in.
  • Compromise: both partners give up their original ideal in favour of a mutually acceptable alternative.
  • Integrative agreements: satisfy both partners’ original ideals.
  • Structural improvement: when argument results in fundamental positive change in the relationship.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Avoiding Conflict: Active Strategies

A
  • EXIT: Separating, moving out of a joint residence, actively abusing one’s partner, breaking up, divorcing, threatening to leave, or screaming at one’s partner.
  • VOICE: Discussing problems, seeking help from a friend or therapist, suggesting solutions, changing oneself, or urging one’s par the to change.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Avoiding Conflict: Passive Strategies

A
  • LOYALTY: Waiting and hoping that things will improve, supporting the partner in the face of criticism, or praying for improvement; E.g., Praying if religious.
  • NEGLECT: Ignoring the partner or spending less time together, avoiding discussing problems treating the partner poorly (being crossed with her or her) criticizing the partner for things unrelated to the real problem or just letting things fall apart.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

STUDY: STRAUS, 2004; Violence in Dating Partners Across University Students

A
  • International dating violence study.
  • Asked students to complete questionnaire
    about major and minor assaults against their partners.
  • Minor assault vs. Major assult
  • 29% of university students reported
    physically assaulting a dating partner; 9.4% reported severe assult.
  • More women assulters.
  • Male assault more likely to result in injury
    in 21/31 sites.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Predictors of Violence

A
  • Socioeconomic status (weak/ moderate effect).
  • Race/Ethnicity (weak).
  • Childhood victimization (small- medium, but consistent).
  • Personality (depression, drug/alchol use, personality disorder; strong predictors).
  • Relationship variables (satisfaction - Jealousy, partner hostility; moderate effects).
17
Q

Predictors of Violence: I^3 (I-Cubed) Theory

A
  • Individuals are violent when their impulses to aggress exceed their restraint of this impulse.
  • When couples turn violent, they can face an imbalance of these two things: Violent impulses, violent restraint.
  • Investigating trigger → strong compelling forces → weak inhibiting forces → high risk of intimate partner violence.
  • No to any → low risk of intimate partner violence.
18
Q

STUDY 1: PUENTE AND COHEN (2003); Jealous and Romantic Love

A
  • Participants told they were going to provide their opinion about the results from another study.
  • They were told about a male participant who was imagining his wife and another man.
  • Three conditions: Innocuous: Wife talking a man you don’t know; Flirting: Wife is touching another mans thigh, gives him kiss on the check; Cheating: you find wife in bed with another man.
  • Man’s supposed reaction varied: either jealous or not.
  • Dependent measure: How much did husband love his wife? Respect his wife? Should marriage last?
  • Found: jealous reaction suggested more love, no differences in gender.
19
Q

STUDY 2: PUENTE AND COHEN (2003); Hit vs. No Hit

A
  • 49 students listened to “real husband” talk about conflict in audio tape.
  • Manipulated two independent variables: Conflict topic: wife flirted at a party (jealously) vs. Wife maxed out credit card (non-jealousy); or Man’s reaction: hit wife (violence) vs. Went to a friends house to cool off (non-violence).
  • Participants asked whether men loved his
    wife, etc.
  • Found: jealous men that hit their wives were more in love, and non-jealous men that did not hit were more in love.
20
Q

Jealousy and IPV: Gender Differences

A
  • People are more likely to justify men’s
    violence when perpetrated by jealousy.
  • People also justify women’s violence in
    other ways; more acceptable for women to hit men, perceive men’s violence as more intentional/controlling than women’s.
21
Q

STUDY: FINKEL ET AL. (2009); Self-Control and IPV

A
  • 33 couples participated together, mainpulated self-control.
  • P’s then given paper and pencil crayons and told to draw the most creative picture: Told their partners would evaluate this and could get $0.50 for each point, partner evaluated them on scale of to 10.
  • Led to believe partner was rating the drawing and then given bogus feedback.
  • 2 Cond: Non-provoking condition: partner has rated you a 9/10; Provoking condition: partner has rated you a 3/10.
  • P’s decided now long their partners would have to maintain demanding yoga poses.
  • Found: Participants who experienced self-control depletion (a state of reduced self-regulation ability) were more likely to punish their partners with longer durations of demanding yoga poses compared to those in the control condition.