Lecture 16: Social Support 2 Flashcards

1
Q

STUDY: FINKEL ET AL., 2006; Performance and Social Support

A

First completed the joint task.
- P assigned the role of “tracker.”
- Confederate assigned the role of “communicator.”
P & C sat at table that was divided by a
partition; P told to control the movements and move through the maze. Had to listen to C for instructions.
Two conditions:
- Low maintenance: confederate struck
to a script and made no mistakes.
- High maintenance: confederate made
a series of scripted errors and became
out of sync with P: Wait… right… I
mean left!
- Participants then went on to complete a number of difficult GRE problems.
- DV: performance
- Found: P’s in high-maintenance condition solved less; mentally exaushting.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Gender Differences in Social Support

A
  • Men report receiving more support than wives.
  • Men report receiving better support than
    wives.
  • After a stressful work day: Wives more likely than husbands to increase their workload at home in response to partner’s stressful day.
  • Men and women equally likely to give
    advice.
    Why are men less helpful than women?
  • Skill: Men are less capable of giving effective support.
  • Responsiveness: Men don’t understand when their partners need support.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

STUDY: KIRSCHBAUM ET AL., 1995; TSST (Trier Social Stress Test)

A
  • Participants completed TSST.
  • Phase 1: Participants asked to prepare a speech as part of a ‘job interview.’
  • Phase 2: Participants give the speech and the judges observe without comment.
  • Phase 3: Participant asked to count backwards from 1022 in steps of 13.
  • Conditions: No support, Support provided by stranger, Support by romantic partner.
  • Found: Women felt most stress wiht support from romantic partner, men felt least stress with romantic partner.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

3 Types of Social Support

A

Emotional support, informational support, instrumental support.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

3 Types of Social Support: Emotional Support

A

Providing warmth, nurturance, and reassurance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

3 Types of Social Support: Informational Support

A

Providing information that helps person understand stressful event; advice.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

3 Types of Social Support: Instrumental Support

A

Providing tangible assistances such as services, money, etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

STUDY: NEFF AND KARNEY, 2005; Men vs. Women in Social Support

A
  • For 7 days, both partners report on: Stress, negative spousal behaviours, spousal support behaviours.
    FOUND:
  • No gender differences in amount of support or negative behaviours generally.
  • Husbands and wives did differ in when
    they provided support.
  • When husbands had a really stressful
    problem wives increased their support.
    When wives had a really stressful problem,
    husband didn’t increase their support:
    ~ Wives even reported more negative
    husband behavior,
    ~ Men don’t support during the right time
    whereas women do.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Attachment Styles and Social Support: Attachment Anxiety

A

Concerns about rejection.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Attachment Styles and Social Support: Attachment Avoidance

A

Concerns about the trustworthiness of others.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Attachment Styles and Social Support: Recipient

A

Receiving Support

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Attachment Styles and Social Support: Provider

A

Giving Support

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Highly Anxious Recipients

A
  • Less optimistic about receiving support.
  • Are more likely to see negative intent when support is ambiguous.
  • More likely to remember support as being negative; “oh, they did that on purpose.”
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Highly Avoidant Recipients

A
  • Less likely to seek support.
  • More likely to hint and salt rather than ask directly.
  • Direct attention away from close others.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Highly Anxious Providers

A
  • Intrusive, and over involves.
  • Controlling.
  • Provide less instrumental support.
  • Out of sync with partners needs.
  • More mentally distracted.
  • High motivation, low ability.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Highly Avoidant Providers

A
  • Neglectful.
  • Also controlling.
  • Unmotivated to provide support (so partner doesn’t have to rely on them).
  • High ability, low motivation.
17
Q

STUDY: FLYNN AND LAKE, 2008; Cell Phone Study and Other’s Willingness to Support

A
  • Participants asked to approach strangers and ask them for one of two favours: Borrow phone to make a call, or Ask where gym is and if they can walk them there.
  • P’s predictions: Would need to approach many people before someone agreed.
  • Reality: Did not need to approach that many people.
  • Why? People tend to underestimate others’ willingness to help. Helpers also underestimate how uncomfortable help seeking is.
18
Q

STUDY: When Support Goes Wrong (and it’s the recipients fault)

A

Participants asked to think of:
- One example of how their partner helped them with health and fitness goals.
- One example of how their partner helped
them with their career goals.
- One thing they lied about their partner.
DV: how much time do you plan to spend
pursuing health and fitness goals in the coming week?
- Found: Most important thing is that partner FEELS supported.