Lecture 17: Aversive Control - Avoidance and Punishment Flashcards
What are 2 types of aversion learning?
- Negative reinforcement
- Positive punishment
What is negative reinforcement?
- Individual produces response to prevent an aversive stimulus from occurring
- Negative contingency; active avoidance
- Increases the occurrence of instrumental behaviour
- Escape and avoidance
What is positive punishment?
- Response produces the aversive outcome
- Positive contingency; passive avoidance
- Suppresses instrumental behaviour
What kind of experiment did Vladmir Bechterev do?
- Tone (CS) followed by shock (US) through metal plate
- Participants learned to remove finger (CR) when tone presented to avoid getting shocked
- Tone acted as a warning signal
- Originally thought to integrate classical conditioning
- Instrumental avoidance: Subjects controlled whether or not they received US
In avoidance procedures, what are the CS and US also known as?
CS - Warning signal
US - Aversive stimulus
What did Brogden, Lipman and Culler find?
- Examined difference b/n classical conditioning and instrumental avoidance procedures
- Classical = US followed tone
- Avoidance = US followed tone unless rats ran in wheel
- Avoidance is learning more efficiently with instrumental conditioning
What are discriminated avoidance procedures?
- Examine relation of warning signal to US and instrumental response
- Consequence depends on what animal does
What are 2 features of discriminated avoidance procedures?
- Discrete trial initiated by warning stimulus (CS)
- What happens after CS depends upon what the animal does:
Successful avoidance = Target response in time (CS is terminated, US not presented)
Escape trial = Target response not in time (CS persists, US presented until response)
Describe the two forms of shuttle avoidance?
One-way - Trial begins on one side (shock side) - CS/US are presented - Animal avoids/escapes to safe side Two-way - CS presented on either side - Opportunity to avoid by jumping to opposite end - More difficult to learn - Safety zones are interchangeable
How can the absence of something provide reinforcement?
- Once avoidance is learned, the outcome does not occur
- Looks like extinction (behaviour not reinforced by shock anymore)
What is the Two-Factor Theory?
Factor 1 - Pavlovian fear conditioning Shock (US) -> Fear (UR) Tone (CS) - Shock (US) Tone (CS) -> Fear (CR) - Organism fails to make target avoidance response
Factor 2 - Instrumental reinforcement through fear reduction (negative reinforcement)
Avoidance response -> Termination of tone (CS) = Reduction of fear (CR)
What motivates responding?
- Negative reinforcement
- Escape from conditioned fear
What did Mowrer discover? Why did he look at this?
- Two-Factor Theory
- Not much is known about what individuals experience in avoidance learning to maintain response
What does the Two Process Theory suggest?
- Classical conditioning of fear and instrumental reinforcement through fear reduction are intermixed
- Can animals learn to escape conditioned fear?
What is the Escape from fear procedure?
- EFF procedures demonstrate classical and instrumental can distinctly make contributions to avoidance learning
Describe the process of the EFF procedure
- Delayed conditioning/Pavlovian group: CS -> US
- Simultaneous conditioning/Instrumental group: CS + US
- Test: shuttle box barrier moved; rats placed on shock side and CS was activated; Moving to opposite side terminated US
- Results: Both groups showed latencies to escape fear stimulus; demonstrate EFF learning
What did Brown and Jacobs Acquired Drive experiment look at?
- Can escape from fear serve as a reinforcer
- EFF confirms that terminating a feared stimulus is reinforcing