Lecture 16/17 Flashcards
an ideally measurable risk involves the following
1) large # homogenous exposure units w/in the pop. of potential policyholders
2) non-catastrophic events to insurer (relatively uncorrelated/independent exposures-less need for capital)
3. fortuitous events
4. potential losses that are determinable and measurable
5. loss distributions yield fair premiums
what happens if we violate fortuitous events or potential losses that are determinable
you’re dealing with moral hazard
why think of ideally measurable risks?
- helps plan whats covered
- how to know when to transfer insurance plans
- expected loss
- standard deviation
loss distributions yield fair premiums…
- premiums that reflect differing expected losses across groups of insureds
- premiums that are too large relative to the max payment available (low frequency, high severity)
adverse selection
the tendency of buyers with higher than average expected losses to buy more coverage than buyers with lower than average expected losses when charged the same premium
when is adverse selection generally present?
when potential insured have differing distributions of expected losses and also possess greater knowledge about their expected losses than the insurer
effect of adverse selection
insurer unable to charge sufficient premiums for sustainable business; insurance market falls apart
example of adverse selection in the news
health insurance for people with and without pre-existing conditions
each insurance policy must have these 4 elements
- declaration page
- insuring agreement
- exclusions
- conditions
- MAY HAVE ATTACHMENTS
declarations page contains:
- exposure info
- insurer policy info
- limit
- deductible
exposure info
- insured name, location, type of org and activities
- possible misrep./concealment
insurer and policy info
- premium due, policy period, coverage territory, valuation method
- covered causes of loss (perils)
named perils
lists all the causes of loss
open perils of loss
- special
- covered unless specifically excluded
- tends to provide more coverage
adhesion
- policyholder has no say in wording in coverage (except declaration page)
- because of this it should be clear
what happens if a peril can be interpreted in more than one way?
if it can be interpreted in more than one way, the one that favors the policyholder is used