Lecture 12 (Movements & Revolutions) Flashcards
Social Movements - Tilly, McAdam, Tarrow
Tilly: social movements involve CONTENTIOUS PERFORMANCES (protests, strikes) where ORDINARY PEOPLE make COLLECTIVE DEMANDS
McAdam: movements are ORGANIZED EFFORTS aimed at PROMOTING OR RESISTING SOCIAL CHANGE through NON-INSTITUTIONALIZED ACTIONS (grassroots campaigns)
Tarrow: movements become CONTENTIOUS when they CHALLENGE INSTITUTIONS, act on NEW OR UNACCEPTED CLAIMS and force CHANGE IN THE SYSTEM
Stages of Protest Cycles
- Mobilization: organizing resources and rallying people to join the cause
- Contagion: protests sentiment spread rapidly through society
- Countermobilization: authorities/opposing groups PUSH BACK against the movement
- Demobilization: momentum declines due to EXHAUSTION, REPRESSION, or LOST OF SUPPORT
- Institutionalization: ideas from the movement become part of mainstream institutions
- Remobilization: protest reignited because of unmet demands / renewed grievances
Agency (Weber) vs. Structure (Marx) - Bourdieu
Structure (Marx): social change is determined by historical and material conditions (technology/economy)
Agency (Weber): individuals act within social structures to achieve their own goals
Bourdieu: actions from individuals interact with structures, shaping society over time
Political Opportunity Theory - Skocpol
Revolutions/social changes happen when the political system is WEAK / VULNERABLE due to:
1. Elite disunity: the ruling elites are divided and disagree on how to handle problems
2. Foreign pressure: other countries put pressure through wars, inventions, or political influences, making it harder to govern
3. Economic or social crisis: problems like poverty, food shortages, or national debt weaken the gov’s ability to manage the country
Mobilizing Structure - Tilly
transformed disorganized protests into structured protests/movements (networks and social ties play a crucial roles in rallying participants and spreading ideas)
Contentious Repertoires
tactics used by protesters, such as
1. strikes
2. sit-ins
3. marches
Framing Processes - Goffman
movements succeed when they create a narrative that resonates with people
charismatic leaders frame personal stories in ways that mobilize collective actions
ex:
GRETA THUNBERG (emotional appeals)
Deprivation Theory - Melvin Seeman, Ted Gurr
Social movements arise from relative deprivation
Relative deprivation: the gap between what people have and what they expect
Ex:
- during the Occupy Wall Street Movement (2011), protesters highlighted the WEALTH GAP between the TOP 1% and the rest of society > fueled global protests against inequality
Paradox of Collective Action - Olson
FREE-RIDER PROBLEM: people BENEFIT from COLLECTIVE ACTIONS without even PARTICIPATING > DISCOURAGES OTHERS FROM PARTICIPATING/CONTRIBUTING
Conflict of interests: individuals may prioritize personal gain over the collective good
Ex:
environmental movement: some individuals rely on others to push for policies like RENEWABLE ENERGY while using fossils fuels themselves