Lecture 11: induction level social media interventions Flashcards
meaning induction-based intervention
stimulate or force peer-to-peer interaction to create cascades in information/behavioral diffusion
- not based on network data, but uses the network for its effects
- based on worth of mout
definition worth of mouth (WOM)
orally and person to person communication between a receiver and communicator whom the receiver perceives as non-commercial, regarding his/her opinion on the subject.
- traditionally, the communicator is a friend, family or some they know and trust
- unambiguous credibility (has eWOM not)
electronic worth of mouth (eWOM)
evaluative statements made by users that is made available for multitude of people over the internet
- communicator is often unknown to the receiver
- has ambiguous credibility (WOM has not)
characteristics of WOM
- Volume: magnitude
- Valence: positive or negative
- Timing: before or after purchase
- Solicitation: with or without solicitation
- Intervention: spontaneously generated by the audience or the company makes effort to create WOM
effects of WOM
- Provides social validation by the masses
- Facilitates awareness, attitudes, behavior towards the object of evaluation
- Aids the diffusion of innovations and brand related information among the audience
- Powerful marketing communication factor
- online gives a wider pool of recommenders
role of WOM in interventions
- gives exposure: directing people to the intervention → keeping them interacting with the intervention → making them revisit the intervention
results article Crutzen et al.
Hypotheses: Invitation to an intervention from a friend is more effective to attract young people to an internet-delivered intervention aimed at changing implicit attitudes related to alcohol
- invitation from friend, more homepage visits, more interacting and more people logged in to the intervention than institutional invitation
- significant
underlying mechanism of WOM
- bandwagon heuristic
= ‘if others think that something is good, then I should, too’ - quantity cue
people think that many people are harder to manipulate than a few people. Validation by the masses purported to be highly reliable
6 steps to virality
- social currency
- triggers (connect it to something people get reminded of easily)
- emotions
- public (do what everybody else is doing)
- practical value
- stories
persuasive effect of WOM
aristotle: rhetoric
1. ethos: ethical and personal appeals of the speaker, trust and credibility
2. pathos: emotional appeals of the speaker
3. logos: logical appeals
2 types of credibility
- credibility of sources: can I trust the person who is talking?
- community
- competence - Credibility of message: can I trust the evaluation being said?
- content
- consensus
4c’s of eWOM credibility
- community: is she someone i trust?
- tie strength
- receiver characteristics - competence: does she know what she’s talking about
- prior expertise
- product/service characteristics - content: does she talk in a way i understand or relate to?
- message clarity
- message valence (+ or -) - consensus: does her opinion fits mine?
- receiver judgement
- review consistency