Lecture 11 - Attachment Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is attachment? (early theories)

A

Attachment is a learned response

  • emphasize feeding/food reinforcement
  • attachment is a secondary consequence of food reward
    ex. monkey w/ wire moms
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What did the monkey with two wire moms experiment tell us?

A

Monkeys spent significantly more time with cloth mother than wire mother, regardless of who provided milk. Suggested that attachment might be a core primary goal of adaptive value. Source of comfort/support

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What mechanism ensures non human infants stay close to their primary caregiver?

A

Imprinting (ex. baby birds upon hatching follow whoever they see first)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Preference for mother’s face in humans

A
  1. Bias in newborns to attend to faces over other stimuli speeds learning specific faces (mom’s)
  2. W/i a few months, infants show a selective bias for mom’s face over other faces
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Bowlby’s view of attachment

A

Infant stores information about the attachment relationship. Stored internal working model of attachment is assumed to be the basis for children’s understanding of relationships later in life.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Measuring differences in attachment style

A

Strange Situation (structure obs.) - asses quality of attachment via looking at a range of behaviors across a sequence of episodes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What interactions did the Strange situation look at?

A
Caregiver - infant interactions
Exploration (use of mother as a secure base)
Brief separations from mother
Encounters with strangers
Reunion episodes
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Three styles of attachment

A

Secure (65%), Insecure-Avoidant (20%), Insecure-Resistant (15%)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Secure (attachment style)

A

Actively seek proximity to caregiver upon reunion

Communicate distress openly, readily return to play

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Insecure-Avoidant (attachment style)

A

Infants who do not seem distressed during separation

Ignore caregiver upon return

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Insecure-Resistant (attachment style)

A

Distressed when the caregiver departs

Not easily soothed on return

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Causes for variation in attachment

A

Interaction between features of the child (temperament/personality) and feature of the parent (parental sensitivity)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Individual temperament differences

A

Initial research pointed to early emerging/biological based individual differences…may be related to interactions with caregivers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Easy (temperament)

A

Positive mood, readily adjust to new situations, quickly establish daily routines

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Difficult (temperament)

A

More negative mood, slow to adjust to new experiences, react negatively to novel stimuli and events, irregular daily routines, hard to comfort when upset

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

“Slow to warm up” (temperament)

A

Fussy and apparently difficult at first, but warm up over time with repeated contact with new situations, people and events

17
Q

Parental sensitivity

A

How responsive parents are to an infant’s needs

18
Q

Studies for manipulating parental sensitivity

A

For ‘difficult’ children, rates of secure attachment were higher in the group with sensitivity training (62%) than in the non trained group (22%)

19
Q

Outcomes for Secure attachment at 2-3 years

A

Better problem solvers, more complex play, more positive, fewer negative emotions, more socially competent

20
Q

Outcomes for Insecure attachment at 2-3 years

A

More socially and emotionally withdrawn, more hesitant to initiate play with peers, less socially competent

21
Q

Outcomes for Secure attachment at 11-15 years

A

Better social skills and peer relations, more likely to have close friends

22
Q

Outcomes for Insecure attachment at 11-15 years

A

Poorer peer relations, fewer close friends, more likely to have psychopathological symptoms

23
Q

Most insecure attachment in Northern Germany is…

A

…avoidant attachment (culture that stresses independence)

24
Q

Almost all insecure attachment in Japan is…

A

…resistant attachment - higher levels of separation anxiety (culture that stresses interdependence)