lecture 1 intro to QRM Flashcards
Ontology
What is out there to know about?
(nature of reality)
Epistemology
What can we know about it?
(theory of knowledge/ how can we know)
Methodology
How can we aquire knowledge?
Positivism
Assumes on objective reality that can be measured scientifically
- broadly analogous
- universal + invariant laws of human behaviour
- aim: indentify causal relationships
- Researcher = objective + value-free
- generate hypothesis + test them –> deduction
Interpretivism
Emphasizes subjective understanding of social reality. Focusing on meaning + context from participants perspectives
- social world is socially constructed
- Aim: understanding social phenomena (interpretaion is crucial)
- Researcher = cannot be neutral –> value-mediated (double hermeneutic)
*identify interpretations discourses attach to social phenomena
Critical Realism
Reality is outside of our obersvational reach
aim: emancipatory, social change (uncover underlying structures)
researcher = self-reflective and seeks social change
Theories shoudl be re-evaluated
Pragmatism
Metaphysical debates are irrelevant
aim: understand the research problem
- interpretations are true if they have practical utility
Researcher = cautious and self-conscious
use all necessary approaches to understand a research problem
What is qualitative research
aim: provide novel insights into phenomena that are difficult to measure
focuses on understanding social phenomena through participants perspectives and experiences
data often collected in natural settings = textual , visual or audible
systematic
prioritizing depth over breadt.
When is qualitative research streategy best suited?
When the topic is:
-ill-defined/ not well understood
- complex, specialist and deeply rooted in personal experiences
- delicate, intangible or sensitive
a good research question is
- informed by and connecting to existing research (cumulative effort)
- focuses on research topic (feasibility)
- open-minded and non-leading (unbiased)
- open-ended and allows several potential answers
Qualititave research question often …
- focus on peoples perceptions, experiences, beliefs and motivations
- uncover how contextual conditions matter
- are concerned with understanding complex political processes (y-centered)
- Aim to understand the beliefs and motivations underlying political behaviour
Deductive reasoning
Top-down approacht to knowledge
the rule + case = the inference
Deductive reosoning is from hypothesis to observations, testing the hypothesis.
Inductive resoning
bottom-up approach to knowledge
the case + patterns= the generalisation
inductive reasoning is from observations to hypothesis, generating the hypothesis.
Adbductive reasoning
The detective approach to knowledge
- puzzle-out or sense-making process
- researcher is simultaneously puzzling over empirical materials and theoretical literature
The case + suprising pattern = new hypothesis
Retroductive reasoning
retro fitted inference to the best explanatin
case + suprising patterns =causal mechanisms
Why are abduction and retroduction innovative tools?
Abduction: helps us inquire after cases that fall outside of our theoretical freamework
Retroduction: provides new ideas and insights which might lead to re-conceptionalizations
Two ontological positions
Realism: based on idea that there is an external reality which exists independently of people’s bliefs/understanding of it.
Idealism: based on idea that reality is mind-dependent: it is only knowledgeable through the human mind and socially constructed meanings
Two epistemological positions
Objectivism: meaning is within the object. An objects has certain properties and we can measure that objectively.
Subjectivism: meaning is mind-dependent. A subject gives meaning to an object.
How to overcome cognitive bias?
- Question your own assumptions and from those around you (philosophical foundations of research)
- Look for information outside of your filter bubbles
(research design & data collection) - Look for alternative explanation + information that disproves your previously held beliefs (research design & data analysis)
What is a research paradigm
- a framework or set of beliefs that researchers bring to their work, guiding how they think about and conduct their research
- shape overall approach, influencing choices of methods + data interpretation