Lec 22 Flashcards
What is the advantage of CRYO EM
Don’t need crystals, can just use the liquid
What is the general scheme of EM
Take a sample of proteins put it on a grid with holes
Embed the sample in the grid through vitrification
Plunge it into liquid Ethane
Get 2D projection images of the sample
Put them together to get a 3D structure
In cryo em and x ray diffraction what is the difference
In x ray , you are measuring the diffraction from the sample from and x ray beam in Fourier space phase it lost
You rely on constructive interference because it’s an array of the same repeating units
In EM you measure the scattering of the electron beam from the sample, in real space (since not diffraction) so no phase is lost
No repeating units
What is the diffence in how x rays scatter and electrons scatter
X rays scatter off electrons
Electrons scatter off of the electrostatic potential (both the protons and the electrons)
What is the size limitation by each methods NMR, x ray crystallography, CRYO EM, light microscopy
NMR (small
X ray crystallography (100kDa to a mega da)
Cryo em (bigger)
Light microscopy
What is sub tomogram averaging
Can look at proteins within the same sample
Can look at the proteins in vivo and get a good resolution image of that protein
What is the difference between an electron microscope and a light microscope
In light microscope you have a light source, lenses that can focus the beam to make if bigger or smaller
Limited to a wavelength of 400nm though
In electron microscopy you have an electron gun which excites the electron and speed them up to a specific charge
The path of the electrons gets manipulated by an electromagnets, so there are no lenses, magnet cause magnification of the beam
How do we measure resolution for EM NMR and XRD (x ray diffraction)
In EM we use the Fourier shell correlation
In NMR we use the root mean squared deviation of our model, if <1 it’s a good structure
In XRD we look at the diffraction of the sample (further away spots better resolution since that’s the smallest spacing you can measure in the crystal) which is determined by the crystal quality
Which would give you better resolution: a protien that is flexible of more rigid
A more rigid
Since averaging the samples
in nmr and x ray crystallography, if the protein is moving it’s hard to get a good resolved image of that part
In each other the techniques (NMR , XRD, EM) what do we want the protein to be
Not flexible, want it rigid to get the best resolution
XRD vs cryo em
X-ray beam vs electron beam
Protein crystal vs a vitrified/frozen protein sample
Diffraction pattern (in Fourier space) vs a 2D projection
Need to know the phases to get back to real space vs getting the orientation (angles) of the particles
Electron density map vs a 3D reconstruction
Protein atomic model vs atomic model
What is unique about cryo em
All happens in real space not Fourier space
Can separate out each and every particle in our sample (don’t need very pure samples likes in NMR and XRD)
What is the main challenge with cryo em
Get low contrast images
What is negative staining in EM
Instead of the blurry image from EM, when doing the staining, you get a contour of the protein
How do you get a negative stain of a image
And what is the benefit
Benefit is You can have very low concentration of sample
Apply the protein to the EM grid
Apply the stain (uranium acetate, any uranium compund)
Blot to take away excess liquid then apply more stain, blot
Fixed the protein into the grid using uranium acetate or uranium formate