Lec 13- Medicines for children Flashcards

1
Q

Medicine development

Against the odds

A
  • Odds are 13.8% (Phase I to approval)
  • Cost is >$1,400,000,000 plus >$300,000,000 post-approval research
  • Discovering and developing a new medicine is challenging, and developing paediatric medicines is very difficult indeed
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Timeline for pharmaceuticals

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

The paediatric medicines market

Small humans, big needs

A
  • Large market- 20% of the EU population, 100 million individuals, less than 18-year-old
  • Poorly served market
    • Comparatively small market size
    • Logistical challenges and technical difficulties have been a disincentive for major pharmaceutical companies from addressing the needs of the paediatric market
    • Disease burden highest in adults
    • Between 50-90% of medicines have not been developed for children
    • As a result, most use involves off-label usage of products that are not in an age-appropriate formate i.e. specials, extemporaneous preparations, manipulated adult forms
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Coping mechanism

A
  • Mix- hide in food
  • Mask: Preceed or follow medicine with a flavour
  • Physical force
  • Bribery- money
  • Improve palatability- flavour enhancement (flavour ex)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Coping mechanisms

A
  • 53% use coping mechanisms (170 children)
  • Use of coping mechanisms significantly correlates (95%) with
    • How pleasant medicines is to take
    • Whether medicine makes a child feel unwell
  • 71% of children who said their medicines did not taste ok, used coping mechanisms
  • 76.9% of children who said their medicines tasted ok didn’t use coping mechanisms
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Perspective

A
  • Identify and prioritise the needs
    • Industry, Academia, HCPs, Regulatory authorities, Patient advocacy groups
  • Address the needs
    • Pharma scientists in industry and academia have a responsibility to design and develop age-appropriate formulations
    • Clinical development in industry and academia to deliver the clinical evidence
  • Sustainability
    • Support in prescribing and dispensing practice from HCPs incentivises and sustains R&D and supply
    • Health technology assessment HTA authorities for pricing and reimbursement alignment with regulatory authorities
    • Influencers support of the value fo paediatric specific medicines
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Current paediatric regulation

A
  • To promote the development of products and prescribing information to meet the specific needs of children
    • The intent is to do this without
      • Delaying approval of products in for adult population
      • Conducting unnecessary studies
  • Incentives for industry (IP) balanced against requirements (for completion of paediatric studies)
  • Scope
    • New products
    • Existing products with remaining IP
    • Off patent active ingredient PUMA (Paediatric Use Marketing Authorisation)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Summary of Paediatric regulation

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Have the regulations made any impact

A
  • 8 PUMAs made in 12 years- good but not a huge change
    *
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Special considerations in this special population

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Special considerations

A
  • Cater for appropriate paediatric sub-population
    1. Pre-term newborn infants
    2. Term newborn infants (0-28 days)
    3. Infants & Toddlers (>28 days to 23 months)
    4. Children (2-11 years)
    5. Adolescents
  • Physiological and ADME differences between children and adults
  • Developmental variability through to adulthood
    • Careful when using age or weight criteria alone
  • Development of specific formulations for paediatric dosing
    • Children’s medication adherence
    • Acceptibility of dose form and dose administration
    • Excipient toxicity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Know your patient

physiology

A
  • There are pH differences which influence ADME
  • These factors need to be considered
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Summary of GI tract pH data

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

At-risk groups

Potential oral sensory problems

A
  • Pre-maturity- At risk due to having potentially aversive experiences, e.g. tube-feeding, sucking out, exhaustion (no suckling)
  • Neurological disorders- Oromotor, dysphagia and sensory abnormalities, e.g. cerebral palsy or issues are seen with a syndrome where hypotonicity and hypersensitivity are a problem
  • Developmental delay- Can result in delayed feeding development
  • Pro-longed and complex medical intervention- Psychological impact of prolonged or invasive medical treatment e.g. NG tube, frequent N+V
  • Metabolic, liver and kidney diseases- Growing evidence of disturbances of taste perception and appetite.Part of the larger group exposed to prolonged medical interventions and periods of feeling unwell
  • ENT disorders and unusual structure and function- Physical difficulties with feeding and swallowing which can result in disturbances in feeding development
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Territory, location and timing

A
  • Do the children in all intended territories have similar access to clean water? What impact does this have on products designed to require reconstitution before use
  • What dosage forms are children in the intended territories more familiar with
  • Are multi-use packs more convenient for the patient than single-use packs
  • Is intended administration in a hospital, at home, at school, in public
  • Frequency and timing of dosing e.g. emergency rescue treatment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Preferences

A
  • Patient-centered
    • Acceptable to achieve adherence
      • Willing participation in taking the medication
      • On a routine basis in chronic treatment
  • Administration friendly
    • Convenient and easy to measure dose, and administer or take
    • Without modification or coping mechanisms
  • Individual preferences
    • Many external factors which have shaped, and continue to shape preferences
    • One size (preference) doesn’t fit all
    • What children would prefer may clash with adult paradigm and regulation
17
Q

Which dose form do children prefer

A
  • Liquid vs Solid Oral
    • Logical deduction= nice tasting liquid
    • However, 8yr old CF patient describes her repulsion to medicines which produce gag reflex
    • A 7yr old neurology patient describes her decision to take tablets and refusal to take liquids
    • ARV medication- tablets predominant
    • In contrast, a number would simply prefer a nicer tasting liquid
    • Raises value of choice and flexible-dose forms
18
Q

Dose form considerations

A
  • Medication adherence considerations
    • Solutions/suspensions- palatability
    • Solid oral dosage forms- ability to swallow
    • Orodispersible films and tablets
    • Ear/Eye drops- discomfort
    • Intranasal- taste
    • Suppositories- cultural acceptance
    • IV- needle-phobia
    • Inhalation- training, drug deposition
  • HCP preconceptions and familiarity with dose form
  • Development of medicines that can facilitate adherence
    • Skin patches
    • MR dosage forms- reduced dose frequency
    • Device
19
Q

Commercial products- our goal

Evidence-based prescribing & dispensing

A
  • Registered ‘paediatric optimized’ commercial products provide the optimum solution
    • Acceptability
    • Ease of administration
    • Evidence of key clinical parameters- safety, efficacy and dose
    • Minimise imprecision and medication errors
    • Control of quality up to and including the point of use
    • Post-marketing pharmacovigilance, med info
20
Q

Multifactorial approach

Developing a TPP

A
  • Therapeutic product profile
  • Assessing all parameters in the setting the product will be used to develop optimum product for children
  • Risk and benefit analysis
21
Q

Taste masking oral products

A
  • Bitter blockers and taste modifiers
  • Sweeteners and flavouring systems
  • Modification of API solubility
  • Molecular barrier around the API
  • Physical barrier around the API
22
Q

Toxicity of excipients

A
  • GRAS (Generally Regarded As Safe) concept- Adult focus
  • Sweeteners- sucrose commonly used in liquid formulations; long term use promotes dental caries
  • Preservatives- some commonly used preservatives in injectables and oral liquids may be toxic in children due to immature metabolism
  • Solvent
    • Ethanol is commonly used in liquid preparations; may cause acute intoxication or chronic toxicity
    • Propylene glycol accumulation may occur in young children due to limited metabolic pathway
  • Colouring agents- may be associated with hyperactivity
23
Q

Step database

Safety and Toxicity of Excipients for Paediatrics

A
24
Q

Accelerating and de-risking the production of a paediatric oral formulation

A
25
Q

Taste testing in children

A
  • Taste-testing with medicines (sensory analysis study) requires a clinical protocol
  • Increasing demand from regulators
  • No defined standards of acceptability
  • eTounge techniques
  • Adult taste panels
  • Easier to do in adults than children- ethics, adherence, result interpretations
  • However, Children are different: taste buds and olfactory receptors are well developed in infants and the number then decreases with age.
  • Tendency to prefer sweeter tastes; less tolerance of bitter & salty tastes
26
Q

Drug delivery route inhaled

A
  • Airway anatomy differs in adults and children
  • Mostly fixed doses or combined doses
  • Metered Dose Inhaler
    • Requires coordination during use which limits utility in young children. Spacers can be used, but they are bulky and inconvenient for mobile use, and different spacer models can lead to different exposures
  • Dry powder Inhalers (DPI)
    • Can be efficient devices for some children but beware inspirational force differences in younger children. Also, children under six do not generally have enough inspirational force
  • Nebulisers with air compressors
    • Provide an alternative relatively passive men of delivery inhaled drugs but can also be bulky, inconvenient and heavy
    • Can result in imprecise dosing although some flexibility possible
    • There may be constraints in terms of total dose possible
27
Q

Drug deposition of radiolabeled salbutamol in a young child

A
28
Q

Drug delivery route oral

A
  • Liquid formulations such as solutions, syrups, suspensions often considered the most appropriate for younger children who are unable to swallow capsules or tablets
    • Taste can be an issue for liquid formulations
    • Dose-volume is important
    • The flexibility of dose e.g. using oral dosing syringe to accurately measure the prescribed dose
    • Stability can be a challenge e.g. preserved v unpreserved
  • Oral powders, effervescent tablets, orodispersible, chewable tablets, mini-tablets and films may be suitable for young children
29
Q

Drug delivery route oral (2)

A
  • Tablets and capsules offer advantages such as stability, accuracy, portability, a greater opportunity of MR but are typically not widely prescribed for younger children
30
Q
A
  • Tablets made for scoring (delivery half the dose)- breaking of tablets = inaccurate dose delivered into patients
  • Orodispersible minitablets- 2mm in diameter, these can use an increasing number of tablets to give certain dose
    • Dissolve in mouth within minutes
  • In paediatrics we often dissolve tablets in liquids (in a syringe) to deliver to patient this can have poor homogenity
    • With ODMT we get 100 dissolution
31
Q

Preparation in oral dosing syringe and enteral tube recovery

A
  • This shows that ODMT can dissolve rapidly in many different types of liquid
  • Offers a range of taste masking for children (in milk one day than juice in another)- individual preferencing
32
Q

Mixing with food

A
  • Mixed powdered/granulated formulations into or sprinkling them onto food is a viable option for paediatric delivery of drugs but beware
  • Food can change the bioavailability of a drug by
    • Causing instability of the drug e.g. acidic citrus foods causing degradation
    • Delaying gastric emptying
    • Changing GI pH
    • Stimulating bile flow
    • Increasing splanchnic blood flow
    • Physical or chemical interactions with dosage form or API
    • Different diets (e.g. cultural/elective) introduce another variable
33
Q

Paediatric oral formulations

A
34
Q

Emergency treatment

Prolonged, acute, convulsive seizures

A
  • Condition
    • Status epilepticus is seizure activity that lasts too long
    • It happens when a seizure doesn’t stop in the usual time or when someone has seizures one after another without recovering in between
    • Status epilepticus can happen with any type of seizures
  • Treatment
    • Rectal Diazepam licensed indication
    • Rescue administration any time, any place
    • Required more socially acceptable administration of BZs
35
Q

Buccolam

A
36
Q

Chronic pathological drooling

A
  • Chronic pathological drooling is common in children with cerebral palsy (10-40%) of which 15% is severe
  • Frequent in individuals who are also developmentally disabled
  • Common in children with epilepsy and/or learning difficulties
  • Other rarer and often more debilitating neurological disorders can be associated with sialorrhoea
  • Reason for variability in drooling in children with neurological disorders is unclear
  • Degree of drooling is not constant over time
37
Q

Uncontrolled sialorrhoea in children

A
  • Negative consequences for health and QoL: its effects should not be underestimated
  • Chronically irritated and macerated facial skin
  • Dehydration is a consequence of chronic fluid and nutrient loss
  • Persistent drooling into school-age leads to social isolation which can be both practically and socially devastating
  • A constant source of frustration for parents/caregivers, negatively affecting the relationship with a child
38
Q

Sialanar

Glycopyrronium

A
  • Symptomatic treatment of severe sialorrhoea in children aged 3 years and older, with chronic neurological disorders
  • Sialanar first product, containing any active ingredient, to be authorised in Europe to treatment drooling in any patient population- PUMA
  • Clinical evidence-based dosing, easily titrated for individual patient needs, to balance efficacy and tolerability
  • Minimal excipients, all suitable for children
    • Sodium Benzoate
    • Raspberry flavouring
    • Sucralose
    • Citric acid
    • Purified water
39
Q

Breastmilk drug delivery technology

A
  • Therapeutics are directly delivered into breast milk as it exits the mother’s breast and is consumed by the infant