Lean Production Flashcards
- Just-in-time (JIT): the essence of Lean
‘Nissan’s £2 billion boost for Sunderland’
- investment announced November 2023
- manufacture of electric vehicles
- Nissan plant in Sunderland, UK
- established in 1986
- 7,000 employees and 30,000 in supply chain
Operations management: holding stock/inventory
What is stock?
Explaining holding of stock(2)
What is stock?
- raw materials
- work-in-progress
- finished goods
Explaining holding of stock
- provision for uncertainty
- production mentality’
How much stock to hold?
Cost of high levels of stock?
Cost of low levels of stock?
How to determine the level of stock?
Costs of high levels of stock
- money tied up: interest foregone
- storage costs
Costs of low levels of stock
- reorder costs
Determining the level of stock
- calculate the (overall) cost function
- find the optimum (lowest stock cost level)
What do we mean by JIT? (2)
- ‘final assembly produces goods just-in-time to be sold; sub-assemblies produce goods just-in time for final assembly; and bought-out parts arrive form outside suppliers just-in-time to be fabricated into sub-assemblies.’
(Oliver 1991, p. 19) - ‘Producing or conveying only those units needed, just when they are needed, in just the amount needed’
(Toyota, Financial Times, 1990)
Basis of JIT
- ‘pull’ not ‘push’: ‘just-in-time’ not ‘just-in-case’
- towards zero stock levels: but `non optimal’?
- but not just a technical/operational concern
Origins of JIT
- Post-WW2 reconstruction
- Position of Japanese economy
- Use of capital and raw materials
Basis of JIT: part of approach/philosophy
- Internal production discipline
- Implications for supplier relations
- Implications for marketing
‘Japanization’ of British industry
- Economic failures of the 1970s/1980s
- What was the ‘secret’ of Japanese success?
- HRM? TQM? QCs? Teams? JIT?
- High-profile inward Japanese investment
- Adoption of Japanese techniques
- 82% of manufacturers by early 1990s
Superiority of lean production?
- Lean production vs mass production
- The Machine that Changed the World (1990)
- Comparison of Toyota in Japan and GM in the US
- Claimed massive superiority of lean production
- 2 hours’ stock vs 2 weeks’ stock
- Building a car took ‘half the human effort’
- But how was this achieved?
Working under JIT/Lean
What about the workers?
- Employee production responsibility
- Enhanced employee voice?
- Formation of ‘lean teams’
- Functional flexibility
- Stability of employment
- Seniority-based pay
Teamworking under Lean
- ‘in the end, it is the dynamic work team that emerges as the heart of the lean factory’ (Womack et al., 1990: 99)
- leader-guided rather than semi-autonomous
- pace of work controlled by the flow of the system
- control of Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs)
- but a different kind of autonomy?
- indirect involvement in SOPs
Second-wave Lean
- Re-emergence in 21st century
- 5 principles of ‘lean thinking’
- UK application in health/public services
- Carter et al. (2011): HMRC
degradation of work? - Procter & Radnor (2014)
- mean, but is it lean?
Controlling the pace of work
- Production on ‘pull’ rather than ‘push’ basis
- Pace of work controlled by customer/end-user
- Might actually involve ‘slack’ or under utilisation
- For workers, limits on degree of discretion
- Klein (1989): effect of removal of ‘buffers’ of stock/inventory
- No ‘making out’, ‘bank’ or ‘kitty’
- Lack of ‘discipline’ immediately apparent
Power of the panopticon
- Jeremy Bentham’s (1791) model prison
- The seen and the seeing
- Surveillance is ‘permanent in its effects, even if its discontinuous in its action’
- Effectiveness means exercise unnecessary
- Extension of idea to other institutions
- Foucault, Discipline and Punish, 1977
JIT as panoptic surveillance (Sewell & Wilkinson, 1992)
- How do you control output of workers?
- Technical control of assembly line
- Direct control or direct incentives
- JIT a different strategy of control
- Heightened ‘visibility’ of work and worker
- ‘working in a goldfish bowl’
- Internalised/subjective control