LE Orthotics Flashcards
Who is often the person who initiates the need for LE orthotic?
PT
Things to consider for Pre-Orthotic Evaluation
- Patients structural and functional needs
- Patient’s goals/willingness to utilize orthotic
Consideration of patient’s goals/willingness to utilize orthotic
- May need to provide education to patient on need, impact of orthotic
- Trial ambulation or transfer with and without orthotic
- Education on safety risk or risk to impact of LE without use of orthotic
More Factors to consider for pre-orthotic evaluation/prescription
- Patient’s Height- Impact of height of orthotic
- Patient’s Weight- Impact choice of materials
- Diagnosis- Is diagnosis/prognosis static/ progressive?, Is function likely to improve/decline in time?
- Current Level of activity
- Anticipated Level of activity
- ROM- Ankle , Knee
- Strength- Entire LE
- Sensation
- Swelling
Degree of Deformity
- Flexible Deformity- Correct
- Fixed Deforming- Accommodate
*** for PF contracture, they need to be able to get to at least neutral
Ambulation with and without a device
May not be safe to ambulate without device, especially if require high level of assist to ambulate
Recommendation for device
- Justification for device
- Rationale for choice; especially important if primary PT is not going to meet with orthotist/team
- Team may ambulate very short distance while completing evaluation, but not likely at distance of therapist during treatment
Orthotic Materials
- Plastic
- Metal
- Hybrid
- Carbon Fiber
- FES
Conventional Metal Orthotic
- Metal Uprights
- Leather Cuff
- Attaches to shoe
- Space between leg and upright accommodates edema
**total contact
Molded plastic Orthotic
- plastic one-piece shell
- no moving parts
- total contact
- fits into shoe (can change shoes but heel height needs to stay the same)
Articulating hybrid
- plastic molded calf shell and shoe inset
- articulating ankle joint
- can change shoes
what will determine choice of orthotic material
consideration of patient’s presentation needs
Which material and is typically preferred by patients and why
Generally plastic AFOs or carbon fiber due to ability to adjust foot wear, covered by clothing
Why are plastic AFOs a caution for sensation or swelling
they have direct contact with skin throughout LEs
Difference of weight from metal and plastic
Weight of metal and shoe is slightly more than plastic AFO and shoe-less than 1 lb difference –> energy consumption should not be impacted by this weight difference
indications for metal systems
- Interim management –> Allows therapist to make changes to system; fixed to limited motion etc
- Swelling
- Poor sensation- dependent on patient ability perform skin checks or reliability of caregiver to evaluate skin
- Poor skin quality- history of ulcers, easily tear
- Need to get patients shoeware
- Severe spasticity (?)
Metal System Advantages
- Easy alignment
- Good consistent footwear
- Ability of therapist to management/adjust
- Minimal direct skin contact
Metal System Disadvantages
- Weight
- Appearance (Cosmesis)
- Shoes
- Limited control of foot
Where should the calf band lie?
1.5 inches distal to neck of fibula
Where does the shank of a metal system extend into?
body of shoe
Axes of Metal System
- Anatomical axis at the ankle passes through malleoli
- Medial upright may curve anteriorly to align orthotic ankle axis to anatomical axis
Double Action Ankle Joint/Bichannel Ankle Joint
- Manipulate anterior and posterior channels through ball bearing, peg (or spring) and screw
- Amount of closure of screw dictates amount of motion at ankle
See typical shoe for metal AFO slide 15
T Strap to control varus/valgus control
- Added to orthotic to limit hindfoot movement in the frontal plane
- Control inversion: stitched to lateral side of shoe and buckled around medical upright
- Control eversion: stitched to medial side of shoe and buckled around lateral upright
- Not commonly utilized, generally for excessive inversion/eversion
Where does proximal trimline and calf band lie on a plastic AFO?
1.5 inches distal to fibular head
Plastic AFOs Advantages
- Light weight
- Improved control, especially though foot
- Cosmesis
- Patient willingness to wear
Plastic AFOs Disadvantages
- Intimate fit: directly on skin –> issues with sensation/skin
- Cannot adjust for large volume changes
- Therapist can not make adjustments to system