Laws of Evidence Flashcards

1
Q

What is the Burdon of Proof?

A

The presumption of innocence (Woolmingtons principle)

“Burdon of Proof lies with the prosecution”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the Evidential Burdon?

A

Defence obligation to prove an explanation without which the prosecution has proved its case. “the obligation to raise an issue at trial”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Are there exceptions to Woolmingtons principal?

A

Yes. Insanity, Maritime and Aviation safety are examples of the reverse burdon of proof.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the “Standard of Proof”?

A

The standard required to discharge:
Prosecution - Beyond reasonable doubt
Defence “Balance of Probabilities.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Describe “beyond reasonable doubt”.

A

“A very high standard of proof” met if the jury is sure the defendant is guilty.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the balance of probabilities

A

“That it was more probable than not”.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Is one persons testimony unsupported by other evidence sufficient to prove a case?

A

Yes. There are exceptions: Perjury and Treason.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the ingredients required for Identification evidence S45?

A

1: Saw or heard
2: Person
3: At or near place
4: Commission of offence (or written or oral account of above).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Is an informal identification process admissable?

A

No. Not unless prosecution can prove it is reliable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How many images in a formal ID?

A

8

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What reasons are there for NOT following formal ID?

A

Suspect refuses
Singular appearance
Substantial changes in appearance (since offence)
ID was not (reasonably expected to be) in question
Identification by chance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Who can conduct an ID procedure?

A

“Officers of an enforcement agency” (Customs, MPI…)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Who does S45 identification evidence apply to?

A

Only to a person alleged to have committed an offence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the purpose of S45 (what is it intended to prevent)?

A

To prevent dock identification as the first time identified. (Unreliable).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What constitutes a formal ID procedure

A
eight people
Similar appearance
Police staff not to be used
No coaching witness
Different participants for different parades
Suspect MUST be advised: Not compulsory;
can have lawyer present.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Is a statement made by a defendant admissible against a co-defendant?

A

No.

17
Q

What three rules may exclude defendants statements?

A
Reliability Rule (S28)
Oppression rule (S29)
Improperly obtained Evidence Rule (S30)
18
Q

What is the oppression rule?

A

If on evidential grounds the judge or defence raises it - the statement must be excluded unless Judge satisfied statement not influenced by oppression.

19
Q

What is oppression?

A

Degrading or inhuman.

20
Q

What is “improperly obtained evidence”

A

In breach of any enactment (S3 Bill of Rights Act)
As a consequence of inadmissible evidence.
Obtained unfairly - as determined by Judge.

21
Q

Did the Evidence Act 2006 replace Judges rules?

A

Yes but the intent is similar.

22
Q

What are the practice note “Judges Rules”

A

1: Police may ask Qs of any person but must not suggest it it is compulsory to answer.
2: Caution and Rights must be given when sufficient to charge
3: Questions to person in custody must not amount to cross examination.
4: When questioned about statements made by others; evidence must be fairly explained.
5: Video recording preferred.