law paper 1 cases Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

novus actus interveniens

A

R v Jordan, R v Malcherek, R v Roberts, R v Williams

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Intention

A

R v Mohan, R v Moloney, Chandler v DPP, R v Woolin, R v Hancock and Shankland

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

recklessness

A

R v Cunningham, DPP v K

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Mens rea

A

R v Latimer, R v Mitchell, R v Pembliton (transferred malice), Fagan v MPC, Thabo Meli v R (continuing MR) , R v Church (continuing MR)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

assault

A

R v Constanza, R v Ireland, Tuberville v Savage, R v Light, R v Lamb, Smith v Chief Superintendent of Woking Police Station

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

battery

A

R v Savage, Collins v Wilcock, Fagan v MPC, Haystead v Chief Constable of Derbyshire, R v Santana Bermudez, R v Thomas

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

abh

A

R v Miller, R v Smith, T v DPP, R v Chan Fook, R v Parmenter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

gbh

A

JCC v Eisenhower (wounding), R v Saunders, R v Burstow, R v Brown and Stratton, R v Dica, R v Konzani, R v Mowatt

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

murder

A

R v Nedrick, AG ref no3 1994, R v Vickers, R v Matthews and Alleyne, R v Hancock and Shankland

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

diminished responsibility

A

R v Dowds, R v Wood, R v Byrne, R v Dietschmann

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

loss of control

A

R v Ahluwalia, R v Ibrams and Gregory, R v Hatter, R v Bowyer, R v Clinton, R v Dawes, R v Gregson

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

constructive manslaughter

A

R v Lowe, R v Dawson, R v Larkin, R v Goodfellow, R v Kennedy, R v Shohid, AG ref no4 1980, R v Le Brun, R v Newsbury and Jones, R v Carey

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

gross negligence manslaughter

A

Donoghue v Stevenson, Caparo v Dickman, R v Evans, R v Wacker, R v Singh, R v Misra, R v Srivastava, R v Bateman, R v Adomako, R v Finlay, R v Andrews

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

theft

A

R v Morris, R v Gomez, R v Hinks, Ivey v Genting Casino, Lawrence v MPC, Oxford v Moss, R v Marshall, R v Kelly and Lindsay, R v Turner, R v Wain, R v Akbar, R v Rostron, Williams v Phillips, R v Woodman, R v Velumyl, R v Lloyd, R v Raphael, R v Lavender, DPP v J and others, R v Small

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

robbery

A

R v Clouden, R v Hale, R v Atakpu, R v Bentham, B and R v DPP

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

burglary

A

R v Collins, R v Brown, R v Ryan, Stevens v Gourley, R v Walkington, R v Jones and Smith

17
Q

insanity

A

R v Sullivan, R v Kemp, R v Hennessy, R v Quick, R v Oye, R v Coley, R v Windle, R v Clarke, R v M’Naughten

18
Q

intoxication

A

R v Majewski, R v Beard, R v Kingston, Attorney general for Northern Ireland v Gallagher

19
Q

automatism

A

Attorney general reference no2 1992, R v Bratty, R v T, R v Lipman, R v Bailey, Hill v Baxter

20
Q

consent

A

R v Bland, Pretty v UK, AG ref no6 1980, R v Barnes, Wilson v Pringle, R v Wilson, R v Jones, R v Brown and others, R v Slingsby, R c Gillick, Burrell v Harmer, R v Olugboja, R v Tabassum

21
Q

self defence

A

R v Richardson and Irwin, R v Gladstone Williams, R v Bird, R v Martin, Collins v SoS for justice

22
Q

duress by threats

A

R v Valderrama Vega, R v Cole, R v Bowen, R v Hudson and Taylor, R v Abdul, R v Howe, R v Gotts, R v Gill, R v Sharp

23
Q

duress by circumstances

A

R v Willer, R v Conway

24
Q

juries

A

R v Raheem UL Nasir, R v Ex Parte Brownlow, R v Mason, R v Ponting, R v Randle and Pottle, R v Young, Sander v UK, R v Taylor and Taylor

25
Q

omissions

A

Leicester v Pearson, R v Larsonneur, R v Winzar, R v Pittwood, R v Stone and Dobinson, R v Dytham, R v Gibbins and Proctor, R v Miller

26
Q

factual causation

A

R v White, R v Pagett, R v Kimsey, R v Hughes, R v Benge, R v Cheshire, R v Blaue (think skull rule)