law paper 1 cases Flashcards
novus actus interveniens
R v Jordan, R v Malcherek, R v Roberts, R v Williams
Intention
R v Mohan, R v Moloney, Chandler v DPP, R v Woolin, R v Hancock and Shankland
recklessness
R v Cunningham, DPP v K
Mens rea
R v Latimer, R v Mitchell, R v Pembliton (transferred malice), Fagan v MPC, Thabo Meli v R (continuing MR) , R v Church (continuing MR)
assault
R v Constanza, R v Ireland, Tuberville v Savage, R v Light, R v Lamb, Smith v Chief Superintendent of Woking Police Station
battery
R v Savage, Collins v Wilcock, Fagan v MPC, Haystead v Chief Constable of Derbyshire, R v Santana Bermudez, R v Thomas
abh
R v Miller, R v Smith, T v DPP, R v Chan Fook, R v Parmenter
gbh
JCC v Eisenhower (wounding), R v Saunders, R v Burstow, R v Brown and Stratton, R v Dica, R v Konzani, R v Mowatt
murder
R v Nedrick, AG ref no3 1994, R v Vickers, R v Matthews and Alleyne, R v Hancock and Shankland
diminished responsibility
R v Dowds, R v Wood, R v Byrne, R v Dietschmann
loss of control
R v Ahluwalia, R v Ibrams and Gregory, R v Hatter, R v Bowyer, R v Clinton, R v Dawes, R v Gregson
constructive manslaughter
R v Lowe, R v Dawson, R v Larkin, R v Goodfellow, R v Kennedy, R v Shohid, AG ref no4 1980, R v Le Brun, R v Newsbury and Jones, R v Carey
gross negligence manslaughter
Donoghue v Stevenson, Caparo v Dickman, R v Evans, R v Wacker, R v Singh, R v Misra, R v Srivastava, R v Bateman, R v Adomako, R v Finlay, R v Andrews
theft
R v Morris, R v Gomez, R v Hinks, Ivey v Genting Casino, Lawrence v MPC, Oxford v Moss, R v Marshall, R v Kelly and Lindsay, R v Turner, R v Wain, R v Akbar, R v Rostron, Williams v Phillips, R v Woodman, R v Velumyl, R v Lloyd, R v Raphael, R v Lavender, DPP v J and others, R v Small
robbery
R v Clouden, R v Hale, R v Atakpu, R v Bentham, B and R v DPP
burglary
R v Collins, R v Brown, R v Ryan, Stevens v Gourley, R v Walkington, R v Jones and Smith
insanity
R v Sullivan, R v Kemp, R v Hennessy, R v Quick, R v Oye, R v Coley, R v Windle, R v Clarke, R v M’Naughten
intoxication
R v Majewski, R v Beard, R v Kingston, Attorney general for Northern Ireland v Gallagher
automatism
Attorney general reference no2 1992, R v Bratty, R v T, R v Lipman, R v Bailey, Hill v Baxter
consent
R v Bland, Pretty v UK, AG ref no6 1980, R v Barnes, Wilson v Pringle, R v Wilson, R v Jones, R v Brown and others, R v Slingsby, R c Gillick, Burrell v Harmer, R v Olugboja, R v Tabassum
self defence
R v Richardson and Irwin, R v Gladstone Williams, R v Bird, R v Martin, Collins v SoS for justice
duress by threats
R v Valderrama Vega, R v Cole, R v Bowen, R v Hudson and Taylor, R v Abdul, R v Howe, R v Gotts, R v Gill, R v Sharp
duress by circumstances
R v Willer, R v Conway
juries
R v Raheem UL Nasir, R v Ex Parte Brownlow, R v Mason, R v Ponting, R v Randle and Pottle, R v Young, Sander v UK, R v Taylor and Taylor
omissions
Leicester v Pearson, R v Larsonneur, R v Winzar, R v Pittwood, R v Stone and Dobinson, R v Dytham, R v Gibbins and Proctor, R v Miller
factual causation
R v White, R v Pagett, R v Kimsey, R v Hughes, R v Benge, R v Cheshire, R v Blaue (think skull rule)