law and justice Flashcards

1
Q

what did plato say virtue of both individuals and societies

A

An overarching virtue of both individuals and societies, so that almost every issue he would classify as ethical comes under the notion of justice. Example, it is unjust for a person to steal from someone else, or not to give them money that they owe them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

distributive justice

A

concerned with the fair distribution of resources among different areas of society and relates to concepts such as equal pay, minimum wage and benefits

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is social justice

A

equal justice for all, not just in the courts, but in all aspects of society

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what is procedural justice

A

concerned with the legal itself. Procedural justice requires a legal system to provide rules, principles and machinery for application of the law to everybody equally links to our work on access to justice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

substantive justice

A

content of legal rules themselves. The rules are measured against principles of fairness and justice. Kinks to our work on evaluation of offences and defences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what is corrective justice

A

the way in which society deals with those who have broken the law- this links to sentencing and also to remedies in tort and contract law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what did Chaim Perelman concluded about justice

A

cannot be studied logically bc each person will define it according to their own subjective values

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what did plato defined justice as

A

harmony

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what type of justice did aristole apply

A

distributive and corrective

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what did aristotle think about law

A

law was derived from nature. A just law was one which enabled people to fulfill themselves in society.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what is distributive justice in aristotle

A

just state will distribute its wealth based on Merit(VIRTUE).
so the worthiest, rather than the neediest, receive the greatest share. Aristotle argues that allocating resources based on people’s needs would be unjust, as it would reward the lazy at least as much as the hard-working

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what is corrective justice in aristotle

A

where the legal system acts to correct attempts by individuals to distrust this fair distribution

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what did thomas aquinas think abt law

A

derives from God and coincides with morality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what is fairness governed of aquinas concept of law

A

by ‘due proportion’: people receive what they are due in accordance with their merit, rank and need.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what is a merit - Aquinas

A

It would be wrong to pay workers an equal amount for an unequal amount for equal work.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what is a rank - Aquinas

A

People of higher social status will require a greater proportion of society’s benefits

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

what is need - Aquinas

A

There is a moral obligation to look after the poor. You can think about how this relates to benefits and to the minimum wage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

what did marxist develop with justice

A

different model of distributive justice: “from each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs”
each person should maximise his contribution to the common wealth by making full use of his abilities.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

what did Perelman think abt what justice is

A

that each person would define justice according to his or her own subjective values

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

what is social justice - Perelman

A

equal justice for all, not just in the courts, but in all aspects of society

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

what did Perelman identified and discuses different theories of justice

A

-To each according to his merits
-To each according to his needs
-To each according to his works
-To each equally
-To each according to his rank
-To each according to his legal entitlement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

what did Rawls think abt justice

A

is about having rules that benefit everyone. A just society will allow enjoyment of wealth but will also ensure protection of the vulnerable, equality of opportunity and protection of basic rights.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

what is the ability of social justice - Rawls

A

that people have to reach their potential in the society they live in.
People, from the poorest to the wealthiest should have equal rights and opportunities.
According to Rawls, justice is based on fairness.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

what john rawls know for

A

‘veil of ignorance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
what are the two basic principles within society according to Rawls
basic liberties equality of opportunity and equality of distribution
26
what is basic liberties - rawls
such as freedom of speech, would apply to everyone, according to Rawls, basic rights are inalienable and can never be sacrificed for the common good.
27
what is equality of opportunity and equality of distribution - Rawls
social and economic inequalities may exist, but only: -Where they benefit the least advantaged members of society; and -Provided all offices and positions are open to everyone.
28
what did Nozick think about justice
advocated a free market, libertarian theory of justice. His entitlement theory of justice has three principles According to Nozick property that has been acquired justly cannot be appropriated by the state to redistribute wealth.
29
what are the 3 principles in Nozick
of justice in acquisition of justice in transfer of rectification on injustice
30
what is principle of justice in acquisition
this deal with rules on how property can be initially obtained.
31
what is Principle of justice in transfer
this deals with the rules on how property can be transferred.
32
what is the Principle of rectification on injustice
this deal with the rules on how injustices arising from the application of the first two principles can be put right A. Theft B. Fraud C. Breach of contract
33
what is legal aid
former justice secretary Ken Clarke: ‘I genuinely believe that access to justice is the hallmark of civilised society’.
34
why is legal funding important
if there is to be access to justice for all who need it. People may not be able to access and use their legal rights unless they have help from those who are qualified to help them.
35
what was the result of legal aid cuts between 2011- 2018
-not 20% of people being eligible for legal aid in civil cases -in the 1980’s this was 80% -creating a two tier system with this that can afford to have legal representation and those that cannot
36
what is the percentage of parliamentary constituencies are with out an active local court
65%
37
how many courts closed in england and Wales over 12 years
239
38
how many legal aid barristers' in england and wales
4,116- over 50% of fee income is legal aid work
39
what percentage of funding cut in 2010 and 2019
24%
40
what is the percentage of local authority areas are without an active local courts
47%
41
what does the presumption of innocence protect who in a fair trial
protects the Ds and places the burden on the prosecution to established the case reasonable doubt
42
can procedural justice also be seen as
in rules securing the right to a fair trial and the rules relating to the trial by the jury
43
what does randomly selected jury ensure
fair trial, have no link to or personal knowledge of anyone involved in the case
44
what are the criticisms of jury system
may be influenced by media pressure and make perverse decisions that go against the law, if a jury reaches a verdict based on bias, then justice has not been achieved
45
what is jury equity
even if the offender commit the crime, but if done for moral imperatives so the jury can say not jury
46
facts of R v Ponting 1985
He leaked docs to an opposition MP that showed that Gov had lied about the sinking of the Argentine ship “general belgrano” during the falklands war.
47
held for R v Ponting 1985
charged under the official secrets act 1911, judge gave clear direction to the jury that his actions amounted to an offence, but the jury acquired
48
what is the rule of evidence
are also designed to balance the interests of the parties the case: evidence of previous convictions is general not allowed unless they are very similar to the offence that the defendant is being tried for
49
why will illegally obtained evidence be excluded
by the judge under s.78 PACE if it would have such an adverse effect on the fairness of the proceedings that it ought to be excluded. However, improperly obtained evidence can still be admitted
50
facts of jeffrey v Black 1978
Prosecutor appealed by way of case stated from magistrate who had exercise their discretion to exclude evidence of possession of drugs that had been obtained by an illegal search of the accused’s room by the police
51
held for Jeffrey v Black 1978
magistrates had exercised their discretion wrongly in the particular case;
52
example of procedural injustice
Stephen Lawerence
53
there was a report done for the Stephen Lawrence case what was said
found that the family of Stephen Lawernce did not achieve justice due to police failures during the investigation. It was not Neil 2012 that two of the five suspects were convicted of murder.
54
what did the report said about met police in the Stephen Lawrence case
investigated the murder, stating that they were “institutionally racism”
55
in the magistrates' court what can they appeal for
against conviction and/or sentence. could be a point of law
56
what is appeal under criminal justice act 1998
against unduly lenient sentence
57
what is appeal under criminal justice 1972
the attorney- general may appeal on a point of law to the court of appeal where they wish to question a judge’s direction that has led to an acquittal
58
what are the three parts of the criminal process
the pretrial process the trial process the appeal system
59
what is the pretrial process
which evidence is collected and a charge made (there are now safeguards set out in the police and criminal evidence act 1984
60
what is the trial process
should incorporate the right to the jury trial, the presumption of innocent and the right to silence
61
what happen in sally clarke
she had two cot deaths- bacterial infect convicted of smothering her babies - the expert witness gave wrong stats
62
what is the criminal cases review commission CCRC
It is the independent body that investigates potential miscarriage of justice in england, wales and northern ireland
63
what does CCRC allow
Allow people to get their case review their case if they think they have been wrongly sentenced or wrongly convicted of a criminal offence and they have lost their appeal.
64
how cases have the CCRC had referred to the courts of people who have applied
850+ - an average of around one referral every 11 days
65
what is substantive justice refer to
to the fairness of the law itself and its outcomes, rather than the processes and systems that surround it.
66
what principle is used for sentencing
principle of proportionality governs sentencing practice in criminal courts. The idea that the ‘punishment fits the crime’ delivers justice for victims
67
facts of R v Cocker 1989
D’s wife suffered from an intolerable and incurable medical condition, and repeatedly begged D to kill her. One morning, she awoke the D by scratching him and demanded that he kill her. He asphyxiated her with a pillow, hesitating once when he thought she wanted him to stop, but continuing when she begged him to continue.
68
held for R v Cocker 1989
charged with murder. His defence, he relied on the defence of provocation. He claimed that her demands had become too much for him
69
what was the issues with R v Cocker 1989
COA described the wife’s behaviour as ‘the opposite’ of provocation. They characterised the defendant as not losing control, but deliberately accessing his wife’s wishes. This was demonstrated in particular by the defendant's calm manner and temp hesitation.
70
what does the case R v Cocker 1989 indicates
that defendants are not likely to success in showing that they have lost control in mercy killing cases
71
facts of R v Inglis 2010
her son suffered serious head injuries. He underwent lifesaving surgery which removed part of his skull which resulted in severe head and facial disfigurement. He was in vegetative state and was hopefully recovered. She was convinced that he will be vegetative forever. She became obsessive and believed he was in pain and wanted his suffering to end. Injected him with a lethal dose of heroin with intention to kill.
72
held for r v inglis 2010
she was changed with murder. Appealed her case. Her conviction was upheld.
73
what did lord chief justice say abt r v inglis 2010
“The law of murder does not distinguish between murder committed for malevolent reasons and murder motivated by familial love”
74
what is the issue on euthanasia
“Until parliament decides otherwise, the law recognises a distinction between the withdrawal of treatment supporting life, which, subject to stringent conditions, may be lawful, and the active termination of life, which is unlawful.”
75
what the defences for criminal law
consider the defence of duress, you have learnt that it is available for crimes other than murder and attempted murder.
76
what cases illustrated the defences in criminal law
R v Dudley v Stephens(1884) and R v Howe(1987)
77
what was the result of cambridge water v eastern countries leather 1992
that defendants will only be liable where the damage is reasonably foreseeable. The potential unfairness to the defendant is further reduced by the availability of defences, such as an act of God.
78
what is a exclusion clause for contract law
Parties to a contract may try to exclude or reduce their liability for breach of contract by relying on exclusion clauses. The traditional rule is that these clauses are effective as the buyer should be aware. However, this can be unfair on the weaker party so there are rules to protect the consumer.
79
what case links to exclusion clause
Olley v Marlborough court hotel 1949
80
what is corrective justice with contract law
In criminal law the principles of sentencing try to achieve a just balance between the interest of the victim, the interests of society and the interests of the defendant. Has this always been achieved? Sentencing practice generally follows the principle of proportionality: the more serious the offence, the harsher the sanction that will be imposed.
80
why does mandatory life sentence raised issues
Those convicted of murder will be given a mandatory life sentence and the judge will impose a tariff which is the minimum term the murderer has to serve.
81
what is award in negligence
to restore the C to their pre-tort position
82
what is awarded on contract law
based on the loss of bargain- to put the C in the position they would have have been performed