later relationships Flashcards
How does the quality of a child’s first attachment affect later relationships?
Loving relationship - seek these out in future, behave functionally within them
Bad experience - struggle to form relationships, not behave appropriately
How do securely attached infants form friendships?
Form best quality childhood friendships
How do insecurely attached infants form friendships?
Kerns - friendship difficulties
How can bullying behaviour be predicted by attachment type?
Myron-Wilson and Smith - assessed attachment type and bullying involvement
Secure children unlikely to be involved
Avoidant - most likely to be victims
Resistant - most likely to be bullies
Describe McCarthy’s research into relationships in adulthood
40 women who had been assessed for attachment types as infants
Secure - best friendships and romance
Resistant - problems maintaining friendships
Avoidant - struggled with romantic intimacy
Describe Hazan and Shaver’s research into adulthood relationships
Analysed replies to a love quiz Assessed current/most important relationship Assessed general love experiences Assessed attachment type 56% secure 25% avoidant 19% resistant Secure - most likely to have good and long lasting romance Avoidant - jealousy and fear of intimacy
How do internal working models affect adulthood relationships as a parent?
Bailey - majority of women has same attachment type as babies and own mother
Evaluation - evidence on continuity of attachment type is mixed
McCarthy predicts continuity
Not all studies support internal working models
Zimmerman - assessed infant attachment type and adolescent attachment to parents
Found little relationship
Evaluation - studies have validity issues
Use interviews or questionnaires
Depends on pps being honest and realistic
Retrospective - relies on accurate recollections
Evaluation - association does not mean causality
Infant attachment type may not cause attachment quality
Parenting style may affect both
Temperament
Evaluation - influence of early attachment is too probabilistic
Exaggerated influence
Clarke and Clarke - probabilistic
People are not doomed, just have a greater risk
Too pessimistic about people’s futures
Evaluation - self report is conscious but internal working models are not
Internal working models are unconscious - unaware of their influence on us
Cannot get evidence from self report
Self reporting on conscious understanding