Language, thought and communication Flashcards
sapir whorf hypothesis summary
the language a person speaks has a great influence on the way they think and percieve
postural echo
mirroring body position in a social setting
Piaget’s theory
we learn through developing schemas
language depends on though-thought and understanding first, then language
Piaget used stages within his theory - what happened at the sensorimotor stage
0-2 years , children start to speak
pre operational stage
2-7 years , talk about things not present
concrete operational stage
7-11 years , children develop their own ideas
formal operational stage
11+ , talk about abstract concepts
evaluate piaget’s theory
+ supporting evidence
- contradicting evidence = sapir whorf hypothesis
sapir whorf hypothesis
not possible to think about something you do not have words for
thinking depends on language
strong version - no words for an object - cannot think about it
weak version - words help ‘carve up’ the world = you can still imagine things even with no words for them
evaluate the sapir whorf hypothesis
- assumes things that re not actually true = little difference between the number of words for snow that inuits and english have
+ research to support = studies on the recognition of colours
variation in the recall of events
hopi - don’t distinguish past, present and future which affects the way they think about time
language affects recall of events
memory for pictures is affected by the labels given
evaluate our view on the world
limited sample - only 1 individual from the hopi were studied
ambiguous materials - study not reflective of everyday life
recognition of colours
the zuni only have one word for shades of orange and yellow and in a study, they had difficulty distinguishing them
language affects recall of colours
berinmo people had difficulty recalling colours as they only have 5 words for colours
evaluate colour and language
- difficulties with cross cultural understanding
- opposite results between tribes
bee study - aim
to describe the movement of bees to understand their communicatio
bee study - method
put food close to glass hive, and far away
observed the bees by marking them with a sport of paint
bee study - results
round dance = 100 m away
waggle dance = points direction of food far away
60% of bees went to food sources
evaluate bee study
+ scientific value
- unnatural behaviours due to glass hive and paint and food
+ replicated and similar results obtained
survival
vocal sounds from vervet monkeys
visual signs from rabbits who lift tail and pin ears back
reproduction
peacocks stretch out their feathers like an umbrella to communicate genetic fitness