Language Psychology Flashcards

1
Q

Washoe - language in primates

A
  • brought up as human child
  • taught ASL; learnt 150-200 words
  • sensitivity to word order (you tickle me VS i tickle you)
  • could use to words to describe another word she did not have a sign for (water + bird = duck)
  • even taught her son sign language
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Nim Chimpsky - language in primates

A
  • learnt 125 ASL signs
  • regularity of word order for 2 word utterances
  • longer utterances become repetitive (banana me eat banana eat)
  • less evidence of understanding the underlying structure of language
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Frazier, 1987 - Structural principles

A

principles of late closure - assumes each new word part of current phrase being built (structural principles)
principle of minimal attachment - build simplest syntactic structure you can (fewest nodes of Noun phrase and Verb phrases)
garden path sentences and reanalysis (initial and subsequent reading)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Tanenhaus et al., 1995

A

“put the apple on the towel in the box”
- one/two referent
1. interpret towel as final location (minimum attachment)
2. no garden path - use context ‘on the towel’ as specifying which apple
–> language comprehension is incremental (like production)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Van Gompel, Pickering & Traxler, 2000

A
  1. the hunter killed only the poacher with the rifle not long after sunset (ambiguous- who has the rifle?)
  2. the hunter killed only the leopard with the rifle not long after sunset (verb phrase)
  3. the hunter killed only the leopard with the scars not long after sunset (noun phrase)
    - between 2 & 3, only semantics change, garden path - should always use the verb phrase – rifle is with the verb phrase
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Garvey, Caramazza & Yates, 1974 - implicit causality

A

expectations about the implicit cause of the first clause

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Garvey, Caramazza & Yates, 1974 - implicit causality

A

expectations about the implicit cause of the first clause

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Resolving lexical ambiguity - Glucksberg, Kreuz & Rho, 1986

A

selective access
- context restricts access/narrows down so only relevant meaning is selected

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Resolving lexical ambiguity - Hogobaum & Perfetti, 1975

A

ordered access
- all senses of the word are accessed in order of frequency, how likely they are to be used

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Resolving lexical ambiguity - Swinney, 1979

A

parallel access
- all sense activated and appropriate one selected based on context

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Swinney 1987 - Lexical Decision Task

A
  • compares visual and auditory priming (priming from reading and hearing)
    task involved looking at what happens when we encounter ambiguous word
  • cross modal priming task
    ppts have to do lexical decision task (decide if word shown is real/fake) while listening to a story. e.g. bugs is ambiguous but ppts saw phrase “spiders, roaches and other” which strongly biases you towards a particular sense of the word - insect. but bugs could be insect or electronic
    target words
  • ant - biassed sense
  • spy - irrelevant sense
  • sew - neutral control
    selective access would suggest ant is facilitated because context is immediately used so only the relevant sense is accessed
    same for ordered access, based on frequency of bug to mean insect (more likely) = facilitatory for ant
    parallel access would predict facilitation for ant and spy, since this account suggests all senses of word are available
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Grice, 1989

A

Cooperative Principle
definition - conversational contribution such as is required at the stage it occurs by accepted purpose/direction of the talk exchange you engaging in
- quality : honest
- quantity : informative
- relation : relevant
- manner : clear

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Sandford et al., 2011

A

example - “child abuse cases are being reported much more frequently these days. In recent trial, a 10-year sentence/care order was given to the victim, but this was subsequently appealed”
–> 63% detection rate
- no n400 effect for semantic illusions sentences
- n400 indicates semantic violations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Bilingualism - Bloomfield, 1933

A

someone who speaks 2 languages perfectly, with equal fluency

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Bilingualism - Grosjean, 1982

A

use of 2 or more languages in one’s everyday life

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Saffran et al., 1996

A

mini made up language (Sdkupadotigolabubidaku)
- 3 syllable words
- 10 starting syllables (prob = 0.1)
- 3 2nd syllables (prob = 0.3)
- 1 final syllable (prob = 1)
–> pibo, kulo
adults and 8-month-olds could discriminate between sounds that could go together as word –> good at statistical learning

15
Q

Emipiricist - language development

A

behaviourists
- knowledge comes from experience
- imitation and reinforcement
–> poverty of stimulus & little explicit grammar teaching

16
Q

Nativists - language

A

Chomsky
- fundamental knowledge innate
innate biological capacity

17
Q

Byers-Heinstein, Burns & Walker, 2010

A

high amplitude sucking paradigm
english & tagalog sentences
newborns (0-5 days old)
- bilinguals were equally interested in both languages
- infants habituated to english/tagalog sentences
- at test, hear novel sentences from new speaker in other language
- if couldn’t tell difference, then no increase in sucking when new languages introduced

18
Q

Alladi et al., 2013

A

Bilingualism delays onset of AD
why - cognitive reserve (protection against cognitive decline that comes from active engagement is stimulating intellectual, social, and physical activities)

19
Q

Wernicke - Lichteim - Geschwind

A

models certain areas of the brain that communicate with each other to extract information about meanings of words- passed to production and motor areas of brain

20
Q

Broca’s area

A

frontal end associated with language production

21
Q

Wernicke’s area

A

associated with language comprehension

22
Q

Fabbro (2001) - bilingual aphasia

A

different representation based on age of acquisition and proficiency
aphasic symptoms linked to where lesions occur and where language represented in the brain
- earlier learn & more proficient = more implicit knowledge & memory systems
- later learnt = explicit type of knowledge
- simultaneous/early sequential = procedural memory systems
- late bilingual = declarative memory systems

23
Pinker & Ullman (2002)
word rules theory argues that words stored as declarative memory (temporal parietal cortex) - lexicon subdivision of memory (contains arbitrary sound meaning pairing and grammar combine morphemes into words/phrases) - grammar is productive system of rules (rules stored as part of procedural memory - basal ganglia and frontal cortex, broca's area) - irregular forms are words (have grammatical stored within lexical entry, not generated through grammar, regular forms constructed in grammar/can be stored, irregulars need exception model to tell grammar to not use regular forms --> too complex to store all exceptions to rules, just easier to store grammatical information with lexical information)