Language Change Flashcards
Semantic drift
a process of linguistic change over a period of time in regards to lexis and how words evolve
aka semantic change
diachronic texts
- change over time and over the course of history; thus, it is also referred to as historical linguistics
- two different era’s texts
synchronic texts
- change at a particular moment in time
- it is the study of language at a given point in time
- thus it refers to a particular segment of history
- two texts from same era
Theory: FUDGE
- who
- what
- Metclaf (2002)
- theory addresses why and how new words come into the language and how others become “unsuccessful”
what does
FUDGE
stand for
Frequency Unobtrusiveness Diversity Generation Endurance
FUDGE: Frequency
the more often a word is used and the number of people who use it will impact the word’s success
FUDGE: Unobtrusiveness
metclaf claims that words that attract less attention and comment are more likely to catch on that those that “stand out”
FUDGE: Diversity
used by more than one group of users
FUDGE: generation
successful words tend to be used as other parts of speech eg “verbing” nouns, multiple meanings, or extended as metaphors
FUDGE: endurance
if a neologism word is no longer used, the survival of that word is minimal
how can the type of semantic drift can vary
- old meanings can be forgotten, thus die out
- context, such as technology/wars, can impact a word’s meaning and production
- current slang can alter a word eg a particular social group can take ownership of an existing word and change it’s meaning eg wicked
formation of words: clipping
what are the two types
the truncation of words
- apheresis: first part of word clipped eg telephone-phone
- apocope: second part of clipped eg examination-exam
formation of words: derivation and affixation
what are the two types
the addition of a morpheme to the beginning of end of a word, often resulting in a new word class
- suffixing: adding to end eg happy-happiness
- prefixing: adding to beginning eg happy-unhappy
formation of words: portmanteau
two words fusing together to make a new one
eg nouns “spoon” “fork” creating “spork”
formation of words: compounds
- the process of two words combining to create a coinage
- this lexical change mainly involves noun+noun, examples eg book worm and football
formation of words: borrowing/loanwords
- words we have taken from other languages
- eg term karaoke is a japanese word we have adopted into our language
formation of words: eponym
- name of a person after whom something is named
- eg British monarch “Elizabethan”
formation of words: proprietary names
- name given to product of organisation which becomes commonly used name for general product
- eg calling all glue “pritt-stick”
the long S /f/
- demonstrates a change in orthography
- now obsolete in the English Language
- probably lost after standardisation
standardisation
- the process English went through to create a unified system of speaking/writing/spelling
- cannot be pinpointed to one moment in history
- but started during Middle English period(1150-1500) to the early modern English period (1500-1800)
- its effects were most prominent in 18th century (1700s)
when’s the early modern English period
1500-1800
when’s the late modern English period
1800-present
morphology: inflectional morpheme
- in early modern English period, we saw the inflections morpheme on words instead of our modern day morpheme
eg hath for has - linguistically refer to and as third person singular morpheme
morphology: past tense
- in early modern English period, we saw variety of past tense form
eg ‘write’ has writ/wrate/wrote
depends on pronunciation
syntax: complex sentences/polysyndeton
- in early modern English period, lots of CS and P as longer sentences carried “greater prestige”
- as it provided them with more ethos
- nowadays, variety of sentences to adhere to the manner of maxim (Grice), so aim is to be clear
- attitude has changed
syntax: what did researcher Romaine say
- the discourse of texts during the early modern English period were built on latinate prestige forms, where lengthy and complex sentences were used
grammar: you/ye
- in early modern English period, we saw the use of “you” and “ye” as pronoun forms
- “ye” is now archaic
grammar: archaic (lexis)
old language not used frequently
grammar: obsolete (lexis)
- language/phrases/meanings which have died
- alway say ‘possibly’
grammar: double negatives
- evident during early modern English times
- only in 17th/18th centuries where this became ‘stigma’
- could be why still evident in present, but as non-standard
pragmatics: changing attitudes (good A01)
- how views/ideas change across time
- eg if beliefs change, language changes as a result of this
lexis: polysyllabic lexis
- early modern English often made use of latinate lexis (polysyllabic/lengthy) as this was seen as the language of prestige
lexis: religious lexis
- language often had many religious allusions as majority of Britain was christian during this time period
lexis: semantic change: amelioration
words become more positive over time
lexis: semantic change: pejoration
words become negative over time
lexis: semantic change: generalisation
words broaden over time