Language and reading 1 Flashcards
What 3 methods can be used to study word recognition?
-Eye tracking
-Lexical decision task
-Naming task
Describe the use of eye tracking
-Measuring how long people spend looking at a word whilst ready it but monitoring eye movements
-Individual typically reads words off a computer screen and a camera will monitor what words they are observing
-Can tell us how long was spent looking at a word, whether any words were looked back upon and whether words are skipped
-If spent barely any time looking at a word = suggests word recognition was easy
Describe the use of a lexical decision task
-Measuring how long it takes for people to distinguish whether a group of letters is a word or not
-Shown series of letters on computer screen and asked to choose ‘yes’ or ‘no’ as to if they are a word or not
-Can be used alongside priming - ppts primed with stimulus before doing task
-Longer they take to respond = more difficult word recognition
What did Meyer and Schvaneveldt (1971) find?
-Ppts responded faster and more accurately when words are semantically related e.g. doctor and nurse
Describe the use of a naming task
-Measuring how long it takes for someone to start saying a word after seeing it
-Being presented with a word on a computer screen and told to say the word as quickly as they can, without stuttering or saying it wrong
What 3 factors affect word recognition?
-Word frequency
-Predictability
-Neighbourhood effects
How can word frequency have an impact on word recognition? Give a study example
-Words that are more commonly used are recognised more than infrequent words
-Schilling et al. (1998) conducted a naming task, lexical decision task and an eye tracking task to look at speed of recognition of words
-Low frequency words e.g. armadillo took longer to recognise than high frequency words e.g. teacher shown by all 3 tasks
How can predictability have an impact on word recognition? Give a study example
-Words that are predictable are recognised easier than ones that are misleading
-Tulving and Gold (1963) made ppts read and incomplete sentence e.g. “the skiers were buried alive by a sudden…”
-Had two options to choose from to complete the sentence e.g. “ avalanche” which is predictable and “ inflation” which is misleading
-Results found that if the word was relevant to the context then word recognition was easier
How can neighbourhood effects have an impact on word recognition? Give a study example
-If similar words exist then word recognition may be quicker
-They may look like the word that is trying to be recognised or sound like it
-Orthographic neighbourhood effects - how the words look e.g. ‘task’ ‘tank ‘rank’
-Andrews (1989,1992) found low frequency words are easier to recognise
-Phonological neighbourhood effects - how words sound e.g. ‘bait’ ‘gate’
-Yates (2005) found that words that have lots of phonological neighbours have quicker word recognition
What are the 5 theories of word recognition?
-Morton’s Logogen model
-Word superiority effect (Reicher, 1969 and Wheeler, 1970)
-Interactive Activation model (McClelland and Rumelhart, 1981,1982)
-Transposed letter priming
-Dual route model (Coltheart et al. 2001)
REFER BACK TO DOCS FOR IMAGES ON MODELS
REFER BACK TO DOCS FOR IMAGES ON MODELS
Describe Morton’s logogen model
-Based on idea that perceivers have a large amount of specialised recognition units, that each have the ability to recognise a word
-These are called logogens, and you have these on every word you know
-Contain info on sound of the word, semantic meaning
How are logogens activated?
-They all have different activation levels
-As soon as this level is exceeded, the logogen fires and so the meaning is recognised
-Can be activated by either auditory or visual analysis
How can this model explain different effects?
-Word frequency - high frequency words have lower activation levels compared to high frequency word
-Predictability effect - if a word is predictable then the info needed for word decreases, and so is easier to activate the logogen
Describe the word superiority effect?
-Ppts are presented with a stimulus (masked) and then they have to make a choice about which letter was seen in a particular position
-Results found 10% improvement in performance when the whole word was shown rather than just the single letter
-Easier to recognise a letter in context of a word rather than letter being in isolation