Language Flashcards
psycholinguistics
the study of how we learn, understand, and produce language
why does language distinguish humans from other animals?
animals have fixed sets of communication (humans can combine the same words to produce novel complex thoughts)
while other animals have vocal or motor capabilities to produce language, they lack the cognitive abilities to generate novel language
functions of language
sharing complex thoughts, emotions, plan the future, organize into groups, transfer information across generations
behaviorist view of language (nurturist view)
language is learned through conditioning and reinforcement (correct/incorrect feedback) and modeling, language is stimulus-dependent (external stimulus required)
universal grammar
contains basic scaffolding of syntax without details (which need to be learned), this is innate in every human
gene FOXP2
responsible for universal grammer
mutations result in developmental verbal apraxia which affects the ability to pronounce syllables and words
poverty of the stimulus
the rules of grammar are ambiguous with just examples, so language cannot be learned only using examples/conditioning
evidence for poverty of the stimulus
adults adopt a grammatically insufficient version of a language when they move elsewhere (pidgin), but their children combine the pidgin and their country’s language to form new grammar (creole) = not learned because it is a new language
deaf isolates (not exposed to traditional sign language) develop their own kind of sign language
evidence for a naturist view of language
universal grammar, poverty of the stimulus
language acquisition develops in the same way for all infants (cooing 0-3 months, babbling 4-8 months, single words 8-12 months, two word phrases 1-2 years, telegraphic speech 2-3 years, complex speech 3-4 years)
child-directed/infant-directed speech
speech directed to a child
motherese/parentese (sing-song, exaggerated vowels, repetition) helps children identify beginnings and ends of sentences and draws attention to important concepts - accelerated language learning
phonemes
smallest unit of speech (sounds) that don’t have meaning, but can change the overall meaning
morphemes
smallest unit of meaningful speech
resolving phonological ambiguity (identifying phonemes)
context (people were unable to identify a single word when taken out of context)
phonemic restoration effect: brain fills in the missing phoneme based on expectations
McGurk effect: brain uses mouth movements (visual signal) which move characteristically based on sounds
how to segment speech into individual morphemes?
statistically: we encode the frequency with which sounds occur together
lexical processing
matching speech units to meaning
homophones
words which sound the same but have different meanings
homographs
words which are spelled the same but have different meanings
lexical decision task (LDT) and results
a string of letters is presented and Ps must decide if it is a word
RT is faster when words that are related appear together
RT is faster when the words are common
resolving lexical ambiguity (lexical processing)
using context (within a certain room, environment) to decipher ambiguity of individual words that could have different meanings - we first identify meaning as the most frequent usage
does context prevent other meanings of individual words from being activated in lexical processing?
brain briefly considers all meanings before setting on the context-dependent one (RT on a LDT was faster for both context and non-context if words presented within 200ms of being primed with biased or unbiased sentences - cross-modal priming task)
parsing
breaking up a sentence into its constituent parts, can lead to ambiguity because we hear sentences incrementally
garden-path sentence
sentence that leads to incorrect parsing, to individuals take the wrong path which leads to a dead end (we have to reinterpret the clause when we get to the end)
clause, subject, predicate
clause expresses a full idea of a subject doing something which is indicated by the predicate
syntax-first approach to parsing
we parse based on syntax without considering the meaning of words beyond the type (noun or verb?)
late closure
we attach words to the sentence we’re currently processing rather than assuming a new phrase
“the man who whistles tunes pianos” - we think ‘whistles’ is the predicate so assume tunes is a noun, but we are forced to re-parse because ‘pianos’ is a noun = ‘tunes’ must become the predicate
evidence against syntax-first approach
we do take semantics into consideration: “the defendant examined by the lawyer” vs. “the evidence examined by the lawyer” - a defendant can examine something so re-parsing is needed vs. evidence cannot examine something so no re-parsing
what do we use to help us parse sentences?
visually-available stimuli (‘put the apple on the towel in the box’)
prosody (many potential layers of meaning depending on intonation, not grammar - ‘I never said she took the money’), punctuation helps indicate prosody to disambiguate sentences and prevent incorrect parsing