Labour in 1945 and Attlee 1945-51 Flashcards
Czech crisis
failure of Chamberlain
1938 - British gov yielded to Hitlers threats trying to promote peace and conciliation, basically Britain agreed to partition Czechs to Nazis
chamberlain’s refusal for coalition
Chamberlain thought Hitler bluffing during phoney war, thought war would be limited and little upheaval, took a gamble on this which is why he didn’t take coalition with other parties seriously - was wrong, hugely damaging for Tories
Labour exercising power over chamberlain
- May 1940, British defeat in Norway, Lab tabled motion of no confidence and chamberlains majority fell from 200 to 81 - heavily undermined him
Chamberlain tried to form co-op with Labour because was damming moral defeat. Attlee said Labour would not serve under him so forced to resign (Labour brought downfall).
Role of Attlee in Churchill’s wartime cabinet
Addison- “Coalition gov, had to be genuine partnership, Attlee’s enigmatic leadership ensured this, without him Lab could’ve had only subordinate or technical wrong”
economic progressivism of Churchill’s coailition
- Introduction of revolutionary Keynesian demand management policy – first used in the 1941 budget to counter inflation
The economy stayed mixed, but with much greater government intervention, and with greater trade union involvement in policymaking.
- Commitment to full employment (or at least a high and sustainable level) becomes a government objective, and is accepted by all the major parties.
Beveridge report
1942
The Report identified five ‘Giant Evils’ (squalor, ignorance, want, idleness, and disease) and made the following recommendations
1. Proposals for the future should avoid “sectional interests”, and a “revolutionary moment in the world’s history is a time for revolutions, not for patching”.
2. Social insurance is only one part of a “comprehensive policy of social progress”.
3. Policies of social security “must be achieved by co-operation between the state and the individual”, with the state securing the service and contributions. The state “should not stifle incentive, opportunity, responsibility; in establishing a national minimum, it should leave room and encouragement for voluntary action by each individual to provide more than that minimum for himself and his family”.
Conservative attitude to the Beveridge report
The Conservatives adopted many of the Report’s principles but claimed they could not be afforded.
also went to the polls in 1945 ‘committed to social and economic reconstruction
Butler act
1944
provides for free education for all children, raises the school leaving age, establishes the division between primary and secondary schools, and divides secondary schools into three different types (‘grammar’, ‘secondary technical’, and ‘secondary modern’).
Addison argues the coalition created a ‘post-war consensus’ in which 3 ways
- industrial economy - * Agreement that the economy needs to be managed/planned to maximise output. Informal mechanisms for tripartite consultation between employers, trade unions and civil servants had become institutionalised.
- Whitehall (civil service / policymakers / central administration): number of civil servants doubled, new ministries eg ministry of supply and information
- party political convergence: * Labour joined Churchill’s government, with Attlee serving as Deputy Prime Minister 1942-45, Bevin as Minister of Labour 1940-45, * Led to ‘The Economist’ coining the term ‘Butskellism’, since the policies of Gaitskell (Labour) and then Butler (Conservative) as Chancellor were so similar
land and planning act
1947 made all land subject to planning schemes for first time, 100% development levy on value created by land development permission. RA Butler became chancellor when Tories regained power in 1951, continuity of econ policy called Butskellism, demonstrated the consensus.
industrial charter
1947- published by tory party. Butler said it was an assurance that modern Toryism would strongly guide econ operations and assure social security and full employment.
Tory spending in 1950s
over 40% of GDP - a figure in the days of Salisbury that would’ve been seen as socialist
Brooke- what divided Torys and Labour
3 social policy principles
education - many Lab MPs favoured early form of comprehensive ed whilst Tories stood for tripartite system of grammar, technical and secondary modern schools
Social security - Lab stood for subsistence level benefits, Tories rejected this
Health - Lab wanted more radical and extensive health care, wanted traditional GPs to be replaced by health centres under control of local authorities
coalition was in fact divided
Morgan / Jefferys: there was no real consensus, as Churchill’s coalition was very divided
- Economic policy–the Conservatives wished to return to a smaller state, whereas Labour wanted lots more industries to be nationalised.
- Housing lab wanted to rely mainly on public sector whilst Tories wanted more private involvement - difference in social policy
- Social policy – the coalition nearly broke up over the Beveridge Report, with the Conservatives seeing universal benefits as wasteful,
Conservatives on Bank of England nationalisation
o Mckibbin- Churchill- the national ownership of the bank of England did not ‘raise any issue of principle’ and neither
there was opposition to Bank of England nationalisation but Addison describes it as token
Tory attitudes to nationalisation
Addison- Admittedly there was no consensus on large-scale nationalisation, though the Conservatives generally did not care – apart from steel, most of the industries nationalised were failing and inefficient.
voter consensus
Pimlott- even if there was a consensus, it did not last long:
- In a consensus, you would have expected the middle-ground Liberals to be dominant, but they were not – they only won 12 seats in 1945.
Addison- of course voters didn’t agree but governing class did
damaging nature of consensus
Barnett: there was a consensus, but it was damaging
- WW2 demonstrated that British industry was backward / inefficient – it suffered from backwards technology, a shortage of skills, poor management, and a lack of research and development.
- Post-war policy was designed just to appease the trade unions with a costly social welfare programme (“the new Jerusalem”), but this decays the industrial base of the economy. E.g. Bevan naively thought that funding the NHS would get cheaper over time as people got better and healthier, which has shown to be a completely flawed assumption
Disagreement of Labour over nationalisation
Labour seemed unable to agree on what the ultimate purpose of nationalization should be: was it a means to facilitate greater industrial efficiency and modernization or was it a tool to achieve a fundamental transformation in the balance of class power, or both?
public discontent with wartime coalition
- March 1942 Gallup poll 50% dissatisfied with govs conduct.
popularity of Beveridge report
o 1942, first time Britain on offensive in war and victory seemed a possibility, led to increased public interest in reconstruction, Beveridge’s report was perfectly time to catch this high tide of euphoria, only accentuated this and was hugely pop itself.
o 86% in BIPO survey said it should be adopted, inc 76% of people in upper income groups (nothing to gain from its proposals)
Churchill on Beveridge report
o Churchill in private not in favour of it - proposals costly and spending in many other areas needed after war, it promised an unrealistic positive depiction of post war life, after war UK needed US loans, fear they wouldn’t pay for Britain’s social services; Kingsley wood - Tory chancellor initially against it ‘impractical financial commitment’
o Yet gov aware of pop opinion so Tories recognised they had to accept as much of report as possible without making any commitments regarding it. Thus gov agreed to plan for implementing report but not actually legislating for it (white papers) - they agreed in principle about a comp medical service and system of child allowances
o Home intelligence report found a majority of people disapproving of Govs response to report, many felt it had merely been shelved.
Bev report and Labour support
o Churchill thus made speech in support not of Beveridge rep but its proposals. Did nothing. Labour up 11% on Tories in 1943
1940 Labour conference pledge
- 1940, Lab conference, clement Attlee ‘the world that must emerge from this war must be attuned to our ideals’
Churchill’s 1945 election speech
- Churchills first election speech hugely damaging, condemned socialism (eroding peoples savings, would require a form of gestapo), Mass observation noted this speech caused huge disappointment and distress among populace
Labour 1945 election result
- Produced Labour’s first majority government on 47.7% of the vote, with a landslide majority of 146 seats and thus an ability to implement its 1945 manifesto reforms – the Daily Herald described it as “the people’s win”.
- 12% swing from Conservatives to Labour remains the largest ever achieved.
Liberal 1945 election result
- The Liberal Party lost all its urban seats and only won 12 overall.
surprise of Labour victory in 1945
- Extremely unexpected given that Churchill had approval ratings of 83%, and had expected a majority of 30-80, especially since the election had been called early whilst his popularity was at its height – Hugh Dalton (Labour’s subsequent Chancellor) believed it would be lunacy to fight Churchill.
Labour mandate in 1945
- Fielding- There was a widespread assumption that, having voted for the party, the public had fully understood and approved Labour’s programme.
Labour campaign slogan
Let Us Face the Future”.
1945 Labour economic policy in manifesto
- There was to be no return to the gold standard and a National Investment Board was to direct investment more profitably and in the social interest. The state was to be much more active in the distribution of industry and in the ‘special areas’—areas of the country which the National government could not bring itself to call depressed
- Embraced nationalisation and Keynesian economic policies in the aftermath of war devastation – Britain had lost about £7bn, i.e. a quarter of its entire national wealth.
- Labour planning (intended in the economic sense)- Labour fought the 1945 election as a ‘planning’ party, and unquestionably many MPs and Party members thought planning both practicable and morally superior to market capitalism
1945 Labour manifesto - social policy
- Adopted the 1942 Beveridge Report (see notes above) – promised full employment, a tax- funded universal National Health Service (NHS), and a ‘cradle-to-grave’ welfare state.
. Social welfare was to be extended. Labour also promised— a triumph of hope over experience—‘social’ utilization of the land and a living wage for agricultural workers.
how expected Tory victory/ tactical voting led to Labour win
cynical view -If the anti-Conservative vote went to Labour rather than the divided Liberals it was perhaps due more to a disbelief in the latter’s ability or win or the absence of a candidate - the party contested less than half the available seats - rather than any strong feeling that Labour was preferable. Therefore, Labour won the conditional support of an unquantifiable number of tactical voters. The intention of this group was to limit the impact of what even most Labour politicians assumed would be a Conservative triumph.
- Expecting a Tory landslide, many Liberals voted Labour in the hope of coalition.
WW2’s effect on Tory election
WW2 meant that the Conservative Party organisation was much less prepared for an election in 1945 than Labour
o Most Conservative agents had found war work or gone into the services, whereas trade unionists (the core of Labour’s local organisation) had been obliged to remain at home organising war production alongside other members of the ‘reserved occupations’.
War’s effect on Tory party organisation
o But Addison argues the explanation of war for Tory failure in 1945 is just an excuse, since most Conservative constituencies had “an active chairman or vice-chairman, treasurer and committee” in October 1944. Whilst it is true that the organisation was in a very poor state by comparison with peacetime, it does not follow that Labour had any great organisational advantage.
how 10 year gap between elections helped labour
o This meant that 1/5 of all electors were voting for the first time in 1945, and surveys have revealed that 61% of these first-time voters supported Labour, “making them a uniquely pro-Labour generation” (Pugh).
o The new political generation had their formative years when there was mass unemployment in the 1930s, and there were fears of this returning after the War (the armed services were decreased from 5m to 1m by December 1946) – this made Labour’s Keynesian policies aimed at achieving “full employment” appealing
Success of Labour for unemployment
unemployment at a mere 1.8% when the government fell in 1951
constitution of Labour voters in 1945
- Labour vote in 1945 was socially more disparate than it had previously been. The party’s predominantly working-class support was supplemented by an enhanced middle class element, a social coalition united by a shared adherence to the promise of security contained within the Beveridge report.
how war effected attitudes of politicians to social welfare
o As whole of pop in war effort, gov had to give welfare for all, 1940 - Attlee’s committee approved scheme of free and subsidized milks to mums and kids under 5, free school meals generally available.
effect of WW2 on support for reconstruction and rationing
o The blitz and destruction it caused stimulated media narrative of reconstruction after war.
o 1942 survey - 90% approved of rationing, 60% said because it ensured fair shared - powerful social drive towards egalitarianism, people really adopted rhetoric of equality of sacrifice angry at rich who got off better
Leftward swing to Soviets post WW2
Home intelligence, Feb 1942 found ‘thank god for Russia’ as frequent, fervent and widespread expression used by public.
Churchill - told ministry of info to counter ‘tendency of public to forget dangers of communism in their enthusiasm over Russian resistance’.
Every region asked to report if they had any evidence of a ‘home made socialist’ phenomenon brewing, 11/13 regional offices said something of that kind was occurring, Northern Region notes ‘strong tendency towards socialism in all classes’, South-west region notes ‘swing to left directed against Tories and men of Munich, the old gang and colonel blimp types’ - again shows strong evidence of this shift in war