Labelling theory Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Shopping list of key A01 terms to use for labelling (10)

A

-Deviant/deviancy
-Pos/neg
-Label
-Stigma
-Retrospective
-Prospective
-Self-concept
-Primary deviance
-Secondary deviance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What did Howard Becker state about deviant behaviour?

A

“Deviant behaviour is is behaviour that people so label”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the key concept of criminal behaviour according to labelling theory?

A

Behaviour itself is not criminal, only becomes criminal when society labels it so
-eg graffiti, homosexuality and cannabis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How can majority groups impact labelling?

A

Majority (share characteristic) see minority as inferior, may label. Use generic and broad terms to describe. Can be based on stereotypes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How can social context influence the label that is attached to the act?

A

-People reacting diff to same act
-Killing someone in most cases = murder = deviant
-In war killing normalised, labelled heroic
-If not formal then labelled terrorist - deviant.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is self-concept and what can it lead to?

A

-How we see ourselves.
-Recognise how others see us
-Labelled deviant can lead to deviance amp as it becomes master status (main way we identify ourselves)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What were Lemert’s ideas?

A

-Primary and secondary deviance
-Primary = first act of deviance, inital labelling of person as deviant
-Secondary = once label established and more deviant behaviours occur.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What does it mean to give someone a label?

A

-Make judgement on someone
-Usually negative
-Given to minorities by majorities
-Contributes to self-identity
-Ignore characteristics that don’t fit the label
-Based on stereotypes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What can labels be?

A

-Retrospective
-prospetive
-negative
-positive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the pygmalion effect?

A

-high expectations = improved performance
-low expectations = worse

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Give examples of positive and negative labels and how they can affect a person’s behaviour?

A

-Pos= intelligent, friendly, smart, generous. lead to pos behaviour, self-confidence and motivation
-Neg= addict, criminal, stupid, lazy. lowers self-esteem, demotivated, isolation, impacts self-identity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is a retrospective label?

A

-look at previous behaviour to inform and create current label
-may conform and live up to the label again, not ty to imorove their behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is a prospective label?

A

look at current label to predict future behaviour
-don’t try to get rid of the label, leads to SFP.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is deviancy?

A

Act which goes against social norms, and sometimes the law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Stereotypes

A

-Generalised view about a group of people
-May fit one person in that group but not all
-People higher up with more power decides definition of stereotype and also influence social norms
-Labels based on stereotypes
-Majorities categorise minorities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Stigma

A

-Powerfully negative label
-People reinterpret behaviour to maintain the label
-Hard to change the label

17
Q

How can stigma and stereotypes explain recidivism?

A

-Ex-offender will still have label of offender
-Affect employment opportunities
-Have barriers, go back to the label and recidivism

18
Q

Evaluation

A

EACH

19
Q

Evidence (4)

A

-Bull and Green
-Cambliss
-McGrath
-Restivo and Lanvier

20
Q

Bull and Green

A

-58 ppts, 10 police
-Evaluated faces as criminals
-1 face picked for drugs by 38
-1 for robbery by 31
-1 for soliciting by 12
-1 for mugging by 38
-police’s view same as public.
-supports stereotyping & labels, superficial, bias in police need to train and educate

21
Q

Cambliss

A

-Saints and Roughnecks - students who drank stole and vandalise
-saint = good grades, middle class, careful
-Roughnecks = lower class, careless being caught
-Committed the same crimes, saints more polite and higher class. More lenient on saints
-neg and pos labelling
-stigma - hard to shift
-labelled and internalised, police expected behaviour

22
Q

McGrath

A

-69 f and 325m young offenders in youth courts NZ.
-interviewed aftering sentencing/in prison
-asked impact of crim label eg “treated in court case as though likely to commit another offence?”
-Stigmatisation higher when custodial, more conv and younger first offence
-Stigmatization linked to reoffending for f not m
-Stigma of label stronger when more factors confirming
-stigma followed diff genders

23
Q

Restivo and Lanvier

A

-longitudinal
-677 teens labelled crim and not labelled
-Interviewed 3 times over 2yrs
-Asked abt any contact, crim activities, self-concept, peers involved in crim beh.
-Labelling linked with inc crim activity, arrest followed by neg self-concept
-Risk of internalising self-concept
-Beneficial to not give label

24
Q

Applications(4)

A

-Police training to reduce bias. Prevent wrongful arrest
-Profiling in investigations, labels not always false
-Early intervention. education and pos labels
-2nd chance employment programmes to create job opps for ex-offenders. Shift stigma, reduce recidivism.

25
Q

Comparisons and credibility(5)

A

-Ignores bio like brain injury. Theory better, physical scientific behaviour
-Deterministic: free will. say will always adopt label
-Better than psychodynamic: real life evidence of affect of labels.
-Reductionist: ignores co-morbid and situational factors eg peer pressure
-SLT better. Explains vio crimes. bobo doll. causation. observational learning, sudden dev

26
Q

How good is the research (4)

A

-Poor samples: age and gender. Reduces cred. doesn’t explain how it works with wider ppts. BUT males commit more crime
-Self-report: social desirability
-Correlational: no c&e. hard to test using other methods
-Longitudinal: see full impact of label. accurate