L8: Executives and Legislatures in Democracies Flashcards
1
Q
Types of Democratic Regimes
A
- Parliamentary
- Presidential
- Semi-Presidential
2
Q
Presidential Regimes
5 characteristics
A
- Voters vote separately for members of legislature and (chief) executive
- Members of cabinet typically must be confirmed by other actors (e.g., Senate in US)
- Except under extraordinary circumstances, executive cannot be removed by legislature
- There is no possibility of legislative dissolution
- In principle, legislatures enact laws and executives implement them: separation of powers
3
Q
Advantages and Disadvantages of a Presidential system
A
- The problem of dual legitimacy (president and legislature): Who speaks for the people?
- The problem of temporal rigidity: Fixed terms for both the president and legislature, often staggered
- Personalistic appeals by president claiming popular “mandate”
- Post-election reconciliation is hard to achieve
- Partisan figure and head-of-state
- Divided government
4
Q
Parliamentary Regimes
5 characteristics
A
- Voters (in national-level elections) directly select only members of the legislature, not the executive
- The executive — i.e., the cabinet (gvt) — emerges from the legislature (parliament)
- Once formed, cabinet ministers are responsible for drafting legislative initiatives
- The cabinet is responsible to the legislature
• Vote of confidence
• Vote of no-confidence (censure)
• Constructive vote of no-confidence - Legislature can typically be dissolved by government
5
Q
Process if Non-Single Party Majority Situation
A
- Government resigns (election or replacement)
- Head of State designates formateur (or informateur in order to find formateur)
- Formateur seeks out potential coalition partners or legislative support parties
- Government program (coalition agreement) and portfolio allocation
- If not successful after multiple attempts, new formateur is selected by HS
- If successful, new government may or may not require investiture
- Government stays in office until loses Vote of Confidence or Vote of No Confidence, or “voluntarily” resigns, or CIEP ends
6
Q
Which government forms?
A
- Office motivations and minimal winning coalitions (Riker 1962)
- Many Minimal Winning Coalitions, so not theoretical prediction not very precise
- Significant anomalies: Minority and surplus majority (oversized) coalitions
- Policy motivations and refinements to MWC predictions: Minimal Connected Winning coalitions (Axelrod; i.e. SPD+CDU) & ideologically-compact MWC (de Swaan)
- Refinements still do not account for non-MWC governments
- Policy motivations and minority governments
• Polarized opposition (Laver & Schofield 1990)
• Costs of ruling + opposition influence (Strøm 1990) - Policy motivations and surplus majority governments
• Qualified majorities for constitutional amendments
• Bicameralism and incongruent majorities
7
Q
Advantages and Disadvantages of a Proportional system
A
- Selection of chief executive and cabinet can take a long time, particularly in PR systems (e.g., 7 months in NL in 2017; 19 months in BE in 2010/11)
- Caretaker governments with no mandate; uncertainty in policy direction
- Coalition politics and gridlock
- Vote of confidence and cabinet instability (Italy!)
- Possibility of frequent elections