L6: Free movement of establishment Flashcards

1
Q

What is freedom of establishment?

A

The right to pursue activities as a self-employed person in another MS (e.g. conducting a business or practicing a profession) on a permanent basis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Article 49

A

Freedom of establishment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Is Article 49 & 56 capable of direct effect?

A

Yes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Gebhard

A

allowing an EU national to participate, on a stable and continuous basis, in the economic life of a Member State other than his state of origin and to profit therefrom, so contributing to economic and social interpenetration within the Union, in the sphere of activities of self-employed persons’.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Primary establishment

A

Setting up or managing a company in another member state

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the conditions for setting up a primary establishment? Cadbury Schweppes

A

1) Actual establishment of co in the host state
2) Pursuit of genuine economic activity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Secondary establishment

A

Setting up agencies, branches, subsidiaries in another MS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Commission v Germany (Insurance)

A

An office managed by the undertakings staff qualified as an establishment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Stauffer

A

Immovable property indicated permanency . should be actively managed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Article 18

A

Within the scope of application of the Treaties, and without prejudice to any special provisions contained therein, any discrimination on grounds of nationality shall be prohibited.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Gebhard

A

Lawyer faced disciplinary proceedings for practicing in italy under the title avvocato in contravention of italian legislation

held: EU national must comply with relevant requirements, such as the use of a professional title

‘measures liable to hinder or make less attractive the exercise of fundamental freedoms guaranteed by the Treaty’ must be non-discriminatory, justified in the general interest, and suitable for and proportionate to their objective.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Article 56

A

restrictions on freedom to provide services within the Union shall be prohibited in respect of nationals of Member States who are established in a Member State other than that of the person for whom the service is intended’.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Meaning of services Art 57

A

Normally provided for renumeration (industrial, commercial and professional activities)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Sager

A

Facts: Under German legislation, licences for the provision of legal services were available to patent agents but not to persons who, like Dennemeyer (who was based in the UK) offered only patent renewal services.

Held: The Court of Justice held that [Article 56] not only requires the abolition of discrimination on grounds of nationality but also restrictions that are ‘liable to prohibit or otherwise impede’ the provision of services. Such restrictions are compatible with [EU] law only where they are justified by imperative reasons in the public interest, equally applicable to national and non-national providers insofar as the interest is not protected by rules applying in the non-national provider’s state of origin, and proportionate.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Schindler

A

Facts: UK Customs and Excise confiscated invitations to participate in a German lottery on the grounds that they contravened national lotteries legislation.

Held: The Court of Justice, finding that lottery activities constitute services, held that although the legislation applied without distinction to national and non-national lotteries, it was likely to ‘prohibit or otherwise impede’ the provision of lottery services and therefore infringed [Article 56]. Such legislation would, however, be justified by ‘overriding considerations of public interest’ (here, the protection of the consumer, the prevention of crime and fraud, and the restriction of demand for gambling), provided it was proportionate.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Directive 89/48

A

mutual recognition of qualifications, on the basis that an individual who held a higher education diploma on completion of at least three years’ professional education and had undertaken the necessary professional training was entitled to pursue that profession in another Member State.

17
Q

Directive 2006/123

A

Services directive

18
Q

Justification for breach

A

grounds of public policy, public security, and public health

19
Q

Omega

A

Facts: German authorities made an order prohibiting simulated killing in the course of a laser game on the basis of the game jeopardising public order, with human dignity being one of the principles safeguarded.

Held: The Court of Justice held that the protection of human dignity constituted a ground of public policy which could justify the restriction on the freedom to provide services. In relation to whether the measure satisfied the requirement of proportionality, the Court held that as the prohibition concerned only commercial exploitation of the variant of the game which involved playing at killing people, the prohibition did not go beyond that necessary to attain the objective pursued.

20
Q

What is the difference between a service and an establishment?

A

A service is temporary provided for renumeration, an establishment is stable and continuous

21
Q

What factors are set out in Gebhard for determining whether a service is temporary?

A

duration, regularity, periodicity, continuity

22
Q

Commission v Germany (INSURANCE)

A

existence of infrastructure usually indicative of establishment

23
Q

Can the incorporation of companies/firms be treated differently in another ms?

A

if a co is formed in accordance with the law of a ms is must be treated in the same way as a natural person who is a national of a ms

24
Q

centros

A

can the danish restrict plc set up in england?
could only restrict for ORPI.
eu law can be used for establishing companies in another ms regardless of intention

25
Q

examples of indirectly discriminatory measures

A

licensing
registration requirements
double burden rules

26
Q

ex of services

A

medical services, education, tv service, lotteries, cable networksDo

27
Q

Does renumeration have to be paid directly?

A

skandia- no, can be via 3rd parties

28
Q

Scope of art 56

A

freedom to travel to provide services. receive, electronic

29
Q

Direct discrimination

A

less favourable treatment based on nationality

30
Q

Factortame

A

Fishing vessel could be registered and entitled to fish in british waters if vessels were british owned, managed, controlled, from within the UK = breach of 49

31
Q

Indirect discrimination

A

Rules that appear neutral but disproportionately affect foreign businesses

32
Q

Examples of restrictions of establishment

A

authorisation requirements, restricting no of establishments in an area, ad restrictions

33
Q

Can a breach of 49 be justified?

A

Derogations in art 52 & 62

34
Q

Examples of ORPI

A

gambling prevention
fraud prevention
fiscal cohesion
money laundering
safeguard of financial market

35
Q

Centros

A

Danish registrar refused co incorporation and used ORPI justification (protection of creditors)
blanket refusal was disproportionate
acknowledged fraud as an ORPI

36
Q

Carmen

A

argued ORPI for prevention of gambling addiction
encouraged development of other games posing higher risks of addiction
unsuitable as it was not consistent/systematic

37
Q

Gibraltar

A

justification of rule requiring reports of suspicious activity was justifiable on ORPI terrorist financing