L2: Models of Depression Flashcards
What are the main models of depression?
- Becks cognitive model
- williams theory of anxiety and depression
- lemoults cognitive perspective
- seligmans reformulated helplessness theory
- hopelessness theory
- diathesis stress model
- general model
- relapse of depression
- network perspective of depression
how did becks view on cognition change?
first he thought cognition caused emotion, but then saw cognition as part of a complex interaction of biological psychological, and social factors
what are the 2 main components of becks cognitiv emodel?
cognitive structures underlying emotional disorders and cognitive processes in their onset and maintenance.
What does Beck’s cognitive model look like?
(early) learning experiences -> dysfunctional schemata and core beliefs -> activated by critical incident -> maladtipve beliefs/assumptions -> negative automatic thoughts -> depression
what are some common dysfunctional schemata & core beliefs in depression?
that you are unlovable
negative cognitive triad about self, world, and future
what does becks cognitive therapy focus on?
negative automatic thoughts generated by dysfunctional schemas and logical distortions in thinking.
what does Clarks adaptation of cognitive involve?
panic disorder
involves clients tendency to catastrophically misinterpret internal sensations, leading to hypervigilance and avoidance behaviors
-> treatement based on this model
what are some criticisms on clarks adaptation on the cognitive model?
con: too focused on a single level of represenetation, suggesting need for higher level representations (not just cognitive), still unclear why individuals differ in their interpretations of threat/sensation
pro: offer a new understanding of panic & anxiety
What are some ccommon maladaptie beliefs/assumptions seen in depression?
“If I am not approved by everyone, then I am not worthwhile”
- other Cognitive errors such as overgeneralization, selective abstraction, personalisation, dichotomous thinking, magnification & minimalization and arbitrary inference
what is personalization in depression?
blaming one’s self for unwanted external events, when in fact they may have other causes.
what is magnification & minimization in depression?
“making a mountain out of a molehill” when unwanted events take place, and to do the opposite when positive events occur
what is arbitrary inference?
reaching a conclusion that is not supported or may be disconfirmed by evidence
what is overgeneralization in depression?
mistakenly inferring broad general conclusions from isolated unwanted events
what is selective abstraction in depression?
taking a detail out of context allowing it to determine your conclusions while ignoring all other explanations
what is dichotomous thinking in depression?
thinking in “black and white” terms rather than “shades of gray.” As a result, any experience that is not a complete success is a complete failure.
what is the (loss of) cognitive control symptom in depression?
not being able to inhibit, update, and shift appropriately (start to ruminate etc.)
- diminished ability to think or concentrate
- difficulties making decisions
- especially when there is no clear assignment (when u have nothing to do)
- when there is much possibility of ruminating and thinking about personal matters
- many forms of emotional regulation require these skills
What is inhibition?
working memory
- holding/manipulating information, regulating attention
- inhibition = “pushing away” irrelevant info
what does the (loss of) cognitive control lead to according to lemoult?
cognitive biases & loss of cognitive emotion regulation
what are the 4 cognitive biases in Lemoult cognitive perspective on depression?
- self referential processing bias
- attention
- interpretation
- memory
what is the self referential processing bias?
associate self more w underlying negative schemas
what is the attention bias in depression?
Selective attention to negative (mood congruent) stimuli
Only for relatively long presentation time
disengagement more effort
what prompted williams to make his model on anxiety & depression?
the failure to find global biases in emotional disorders led to him to propose a model in which cognitive biases were specific to specific emotional disorders
what is priming vs elaboration?
priming: an automatic stage of processing in which the stimulus may be linked with its representation in long term memory
elaboration: subsequent strategic or resource-demanding processes
what does williams model of anxiety and depression say?
anxiety: initial priming/automatic processes are biased TOWARDS the detection of threat (ie individual w dog phobia will automatically process a stimulus as if it was a dog, while someone else might just see it as a four legged table. aka the preattentive processes become “tuned” to detect personally significant simuli) , subsequent elaboration are biased AWAY from the processing of threat (so remember things related to the phobia less)
depression: elaboration biased towards negative things (shown in mnemonic tasks)
why are there doubts about williams model?
cus studying attentional biases is hard and often the material used is not personally relevant enough
What did Williams say in his paper on memory and its relation to depression?
- overgeneral memory: difficulty in voluntarily retrieving specific autobiographical memories
- also in other mood disorder, but not in anxiety or other disorders
- mood congruent recall: better recall negative events (autobiographical memory test AMT)
- delayed retrieval of positive memories rather than speeded retreival of negative memories
- inappropriate retreival strategies that yielded general rather than specific memoreis results in ineffective problem solving skills
- limits the ability to repair negative mood (relayed recovery, problems in imagining specific future events: diffculty seeing that things may get better)
what were the clinical implications of williams findings on memory x depression?
- training of focusing on specific elements
- learning to accept negative emotions
- mindfullness based CT
how did seligman come up with his learned helplessness theory?
lab work with dogs
dogs were placed in a shuttle box designed so dog could sometimes move from one side to the other, and sometimes a barrier would go up
-> found that if dogs experienced inescapable shock for number of trials they failed to escape from subsequent shocks even when it was possible to do so
-> learned helplessness, could also account for human conditions like depression?
how did seligman think that learned helplessness theory applied to depression in humans?
thought that people who experienced continious non-contingent (unconditional) positive reinforcement throughout childhood could then start to see the worlm in an uncontrollable way even tho in reality control over reinforcement may be possible. become passive.
what were some issues with seligmans original learned helplessness theory?
- empirical failures (students did not become helpless)
- there were features of depression for which the original theory provided no account (ie the self esteem deficit is not predictable from the experience of unconditional rewards in childhood (which leads to helplessness in adulthood))
what was the reformulated helplessness theory
seligman theory + weiners attribution theory
so helplessness still seen to arise from the perception of uncontrollability, the effects were now seen to depend both on type & importance of the event experienced, together w the explanation that the individual produced for the cause of the vent
what was identified to be a vulnerability factor for depression in the reformulated helplessness theory?
when ppl make
- internal-stable-global attribution for the cause of negative events (ie due to my personality)
- external-unstable-specific attributions for the cause of positive events (ie due to luck)
how is the support for the reformulated helplessness theory
- mixed support (depends on type of study)
- weak evidence for a pre existing negative attributional style in individuals prone to depression
- implicit attributions might not be detected by studies
- mixed evidence for proposed external-specific-unstable depressive style for positive events
- theorys excessive focus on causes of events neglects other factors (like consequences & coping mechanisms)
- Real-world events may override an individual’s characteristic attributional style, affecting their emotional response
- links between attributional style and emotion may be weakly correlational rather than causal
how did the hopeless theory come about?
from the reformulated learned helplessness theory + becks cognitive therapy framework
cus there were problems with the first