L2: Limits Of Attention Flashcards
What is change blindness?
Failure to detect various changes in the visual environment
Name 4 different ways to induce change blindness
- occlusion-contingent change (e.g door study)
- gap-contingent change
- saccade-contingent change
- blink-contingent change
Name the two theories for explaining change blindness
- coherence theory (Rensink)
- theory of scene perception (Hollingsworth and Henderson)
Outline the 3 stage coherence theory as an explanation for change blindness
Stage 1
-early parallel processing stage prior to focused attention extending across the visual field, producing representations of several objects which lack stability, these representations lack stability and are rapidly replaced by new stimuli at their location.
Stage 2
Focused attention produces a very detailed and longer lasting representation of one object, which allows the object representation to withstand a brief interruption. An object that is the focus of attention will be perceived as transformed when a stimulus replaces it
Stage 3
When focused attention is removed from an object its representation disintegrates and returns to the labile state it was in prior to becoming the focus of attention
Outline theory of scene perception as an explanation for change blindness
- fairly detailed visual representations are formed of objects that are the focus of attention
- these representations are incorporated within a mental map coding the spatial layout of the scene. This information is stored in the long term memory
Outline the differences between coherence theory and theory of scene perception
- main difference between the two is that coherency theory assumes that attention at the target object is required at the time the change occurs and that the representation of the object fades away rapidly when attention is moved elsewhere
- on contrast, scene perception theory assumes the object gets stored in long term memory, therefore a change can be detected even when attention is not on the changed object. Coherency theory does not assume a role of LTM
Outline Hollingworth and Henderson’s (2002) research into change blindness
Procedure
-presented stimuli and recorded eye movements. Objects were changed when participants made a saccade (rapid movement of the eye between two fixation points)
Results
- change detection on,y occurs when the target has been fixated before the change
- participants are able to detect changes that occur just after they make a saccade
- number of intervening eye fixations after the change did not influence change detection (goes against coherency theory)
- type changes are detected better than token changes
What is in attentional blindness?
Failure to detect an unexpected object appearing in the visual environment
State two important factors in regards to noticing an unelected object in the visual environment
- the similarity of the unexpected object to the relevant task stimuli
- the observers available processing resources
Outline Simon and Chabris gorilla experiment and the importance of similarity
- 50% of observers noticed the gorilla (black) when asked to count the passes made by the white team in the original study
- 42% noticed the gorilla when the colour of the gorilla and the team to attend to was coherent. In the second condition when the colours were not coherent the same statistic was 83%
- shows importance of similarity in terms of features
Outline Most (2013) research and the importance of semantic category in inattentional blindness
-frequency of innatetional blindness was less when the unexpected object belonged to the same category as the tracked objects
What did Richards (2012) find out about innattenional blindness?
-individuals high in working memory capacity were less likely than LOW scorers to display in attentional blindness. Therefor it seems in attentional blindness occurs due to insufficient attentional resources
Eitam et als research into innattentional blindness
-IB can depend upon attentional set
What is attentional blink?
The phenomenon in which the second of two targets cannot be detected or identified when it appears close in time to the first
Outline Raymond and Shapiro’s (1992) research into attentional blink
- visual stimuli were presented in rapid fashion
- participants were asked to look out for letters coloured in red and to report at the end which letters these were (as well as look out for the letter ‘X’)
- masks (distractors) need to follow the target letter for attentional blink to work.
Findings
- participants found the task difficult when the second target letter (T2) was presented around 300ms after the first target letter (T1)
- showed no difficulty just detecting T1 or T2 when told to ignore T1
- T2 was relatively unaffected at very short delays and long delays