L16 Flashcards

1
Q

What is rationing?

A

Priority setting/managing scarcity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Use a diagram to show how rationing by price works in a normal market?

A

See notes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Why is rationing in HC different? Show this on a diagram, and show/explain demand for this too?

A

In HC a supply of HC is rationed by the state

Demand increasing on diagram to show D for HC is always increasing overall due to: increasing expectations, ageing populations, and technological improvements

See notes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the economic approach to priority setting?

A

Use economic evaluation to recommend how HC can be rationed efficiently

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What does the use of QALYs do?

A

Attempts to maximise the benefit to society from HC spending

Assumes (naively) that the preferred option is on that maximises health gain/£spent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Why do some say QALY’s are ‘fair’?

A

A QALY is a QALY regardless of who receives it; they ignore class, sex, ethnicity (and to some extent age)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the ‘threshold approach’ to priority setting?

A

Country sets a £x/QALY they are willing to pay; if below this amount, will fund, if above this amount, will not fund (see diagram)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

4 criticisms of QALY-threshold approach to priority setting?

A

1) Fails to consider number of potential benefitters (1 person getting 1 QALY probs more important than 1000 getting 0.01 QALYs)
2) Doesn’t consider if a disease is self-inflicted (ie. smoking -> lung cancer vs. born with disability)
3) Insensitive to severity (0.2->0.3 for 1yr same value as 0.8->0.9, probably not true)
4) Insensitive to age IF say child and pensioner have 10yr terminal illness then same QALY value for both

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is equity in HC?

A

The ‘fairness’ of distribution of HC (not same as equality; equity considers the NEED of the patient)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

2 problems with equity as a measure?

A

Difficult to measure

Many different concepts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is vertical and horizontal equity?

A

Vertical equity = people with unequal needs accessing unequal treatment

Horizontal equity = people with equal needs have equal treatment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Observation often found in HC equity?

A

Often people with lower needs use relatively more HC than those with higher needs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is NICE’s position on equity?

A

Do not only base decisions on benefit and cost, but also on other factors relating to fairest distribution of HC to society as a whole

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

If we were to ration on the basis of personal characteristics, which three could be considered?

A

1) Deserved? what have we done/not done in our lives?
2) Life cycle: age of patients
3) Hard-life

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are the two main concepts of ‘hard-life’ HC access?

A

1) Rawls maxi-min (focus on those worst off)

2) Double-jeopardy argument (do not give more hardship to those who already have had it)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the ‘fair innings’ argument? What would it lead to? What is the rationale behind it?

A

Idea: everyone in society is entitled to a good span of health (Williams, 1997 - 70yrs)

Would lead to a bias of HC towards the young

Rationale: is a terrible to die at any age, but terrible and unlucky/unfortunate to die young

17
Q

Advantages of fair innings argument?

A

equitable (all have this entitlement)
concerns whole-life experience
outcome-based
quantifiable

18
Q

Explain how one might apply fair innings argument?

A

If male social classes 1 and 2 have life expectancy 72yrs, and social classes 4 and 5 have 67yrs, then HC reallocation towards social classes 4 and 5

19
Q

Explain an issue with fair-innings argument?

A

May lead to overall reduction in HC efficiency (fewer overall QALY gains since treating people with lower marginal benefit???) (draw diagram and explain fully why)

20
Q

Explain Rawls maximin approach in relation to HC?

A

If you didn’t know where you’d end up in society, how would you want it to be structured?
Most would want the most HC resources to go to those with greatest illnesses

21
Q

2 problems with Rawls approach to HC?

A

1) Inefficient: most ill may never be able to achieve full health (eg. incurable diseases tf not many QALYs) tf those only slightly better off would not get necessary HC resources -> lower overall society total QALYs (tf inefficient)
2) Risk-aversion assumption: assumes people are risk averse, cannot say this for everyone

22
Q

Conclusions (see):

A

Normative framework (fair/not) to help make rational policy recommendations - shows not always about efficiency!