L12 Flashcards
What approach is a CBA?
welfarist (tf not much help in health econ.)
What is a CBA okay for in health econ.?
Societal costing perspective: ie. calculating if there is a net gain/loss from a policy change (is there a pareto improvement?) - usually used alongside other measures in health
3 types of costs a CBA may look at?
1) NHS (eg. inpatient stays, medications)
2) Personal social services (eg. social workers, care homes)
3) Societal costs (NHS/PSS resource items, travel costs to hospital etc.)
What assumption does CBA make? Issue with this?
It uses market prices as a proxy of opportunity cost
Issue: in a distorted economy this does not necessarily hold - real social values cannot be directly observed tf true economic value remains unknown!
What can happen due to the cost methods used in CBA?
Cost estimates may become biased
Solution to cost estimate bias?
Shadow pricing - due to numerous inputs/outputs in CBA, shadow pricing is a better estimator especially in areas such as mental health/elderly where true market valuations are difficult to obtain due to high levels of informal care!
Why is valuing informal care so difficult?
Includes so many aspects: housekeeping time, time lost out in socialising, impact on carer’s QofL, time off work for carer, time spent travelling/during treatment/during consultation
2 positive externalities of informal care?
Decreases cost of formal HC
Delays entry to nursing home entry
2 negative externalities of informal care?
Time off work
Impact on carer’s QofL
Why is it difficult to value informal care?
Market prices for the costs mentioned often do not have market prices! Therefore must use proxy goods to estimate the value
How do proxy goods work?
They value the time spent care-giving at market price of a close substitute, for example at the wage rate of a professional caregiver
Methods for estimating Monetary Value of Benefits?
1) Human capital approach
2) State preference
2 types of stated preference?
1) Contingent valuation (WTP/WTA)
2) Discrete choice experiments
How does the human capital approach estimate the monetary value? (2)
It equates the value of life extension/losses (due to morbidity) with forgone earnings that are discounted to their present value
Therefore the value of a person is defined by their potential, inherent net product evaluation through income gained through employment
Why is the human capital approach not used much/at all anymore? (2)
It means retired people are valued much less than non-retired people
Also has been shown to create biases for white adult males, where wage differentiation likely represents discrimination rather than worker productivity