L10 - linking consumption and production: commodity chains and production networks Flashcards
Disintegration of production
- Vertical integration (hierarchy)
- External networks
o Markets (e.g. apple do not do any production of their products, earn all their money in marketing)
o Subcontracting
o Strategic alliances/joint ventures
o Franchising/licensing - Every commodity chain/production network constitutes a unique constellation of activities performed via complex combinations of internal and external network connections
- 1970s firms started to outsource and offshore
GCCs - analytical elements
- inter-organisational networks, clustered around one commodity
link households, enterprises and states - situationally specific, socially constructed, and locally integrated
- involve the acquisition and/or organization of inputs, labour power, transportation, distribution and consumption
GCCs - main dimensions
- Input-Output Structure
- Geography or Territoriality
- Governance Structure
- Institutional Framework
Evolving geographies of GCCs
- Increasingly organised at the global scale (cf. globalization as process)
- But other spatial scales still important, especially macro-regional
- Increasingly geographically complex – enabled by a range of transport, communication and process technologies
- Increasingly dynamic and liable to ‘spatial switching’, due to both technological and organisational processes
- Constituted by combinations of long-distance connections and clusters
Coffee vs laptops
COFFEE
- Coffee is tropical product, produced south of equator
- Consumption is concentrated in the global north
- China = rising middle class and westernisation, likely that coffee consumption is increasing here
Coffee vs laptops
LAPTOPS
- Yangtze delta, China
- Highly concentrated area
- Lots of investment comes from Taiwan
- Highly networked across space globally
Producer and buyer-driven production systems
- Geographies of networks determined by buyers = refers to retailers who buy from manufacturers
Power for key actors - Coffee produced by huge number of producers in the global south (around 25 million)
- But only 4 large global traders = control 40% of international trading markets (concentration of power)
- Consumption = only small number of roasters = control almost 50% of roasting in the world (they are in the position to extract the most value)
- Moves along production chains to where it is sold = 30 grocers who will sell to 500 million consumers
The upgrading debate
- Process upgrading: e.g. from assembling components to assembling whole computers (OEA to OEM)
- Product upgrading: e.g. adding design capacity to assembly operations (OEM to ODM)
- Functional upgrading: e.g. moving into selling products under own brand (ODM to OBM)
- Chain upgrading: e.g. moving from TVs to computer monitors, or laptops to wireless phones
- Policy interventions often seek to facilitate these processes
Institutional contexts of commodity chains
SPATIAL SCALE
- Global scale: WTO, IMF etc.
- Macro-regional scale: EU, NAFTA, ASEAN etc.
- National scale: wide variety of national government policies and regulations
- Local/regional scale: activities of local governments
Institutional contexts of commodity chains
FORMAL VS. INFORMAL
- Formal – the rules and regulations that determine how economic activity is undertaken in particular places (e.g. tax policy, environmental regulations etc.)
- Informal – less tangible, place-specific ways of doing business that relate to social, economic and political cultures of places
Tea in S. India
- many institutional actors involved = not linear
- highly complex in terms of institutional governing
GPNs
Henderson et al, 2002
- nexus of interconnected functions and operations through which G&S are produced, distributed and consumed (increasingly complex and global)
- GPN aims to = ‘understand the social and developmental dynamics of contemporary
capitalism at the global-local nexus.’ (Bair 2005)
How is GPN approach distinctive?
- Explicitly considers extra-firm networks, bringing into view the broad range of non-firm organizations – e.g. government agencies, trade unions, NGOs, and consumer groups – that shape GPNs
- Is innately multi-scalar, and considers the interactions and mutual constitution of all spatial scales from the local to the global
- The governance characteristics of GPNs are taken to be much more complex, contingent, and variable over time than is suggested in GCC/GVC analysis