Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Polsci II > L1: Classic Theories of International Politics: Introduction > Flashcards

L1: Classic Theories of International Politics: Introduction Flashcards

1
Q

General Facts

A
  • 70% of time, when allied states are attacked, their allies do not come to their help. This implies alliances are generally unreliable.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q
  • Democracies win more wars than autocracies:
A 
Domestic concern (the electorate)
More selective about wars to fight (who hits first is more motivated to win)
In-depth evaluation of the chances of winning
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Key Ideas

A
  • Focus on leaders (decision-makers), not states

- Choices are constrained

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Choices are constrained

A
  • Power
  • Preferences
  • Perceptions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q
  • Key topics
A
  • Self-Interest drives everything
  • Collective Action Problems
  • Coordination, Monitoring, Sanctioning
  • Endogenous (strategic) choice; Selection effects
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Rationality of preferences

A
  • Completeness: ranking alternatives

- Transitivity: A>B and B>C then A>C

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Rational choices are

A

models of action: they predict what people are expected to do depending on their preferences and the constraints they face.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

‘The National Interest’

A
  • State as a rational unitary actor
  • A State has different objectives:
    Maximize power
    Maximize wealth
    Maximize probability of survival
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Arrow’s theorem

Definition

A

The dictatorial rule is the only aggregation system that converts the ranked preferences of individuals who have three+ discrete alternatives into a community-wide ranking that satisfies the following criteria:

  • Unrestricted domain
  • Social Transitivity
  • Pareto Improvement
  • Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Arrow’s theorem- Unrestricted domain

A

All possible preferences are allowed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Arrow’s theorem- Social Transitivity

A

Equivalent of transitivity for individuals, applied to the community-wide ranking.

e.g.: consider majority voting
Consider the following preferences for foreign politics of three factions within the US Congress between three policies (more defence, more foreign aid, balance between the two)
o Hawks: Defence > Balance > Foreign Aid
o Doves: Foreign Aid > Defence > Balance
o Moderate: Balance > Foreign Aid > Defence

  • Defence vs Balance → Defence
  • Defence vs Foreign Aid → Foreign aid
  • Foreign Aid vs Balance → Balance
    Majority voting can lead to cycles - no social transitivity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Arrow’s theorem- Pareto Improvement

A

If everybody is at least as wealthy under alternative A than under alternative B, and somebody is wealthier under alternative A than under alternative B, then we want the community-wide ranking to rank A above B.

e.g.: Consider the following preferences for trade policy in a US congressional committee
o Dana: D>P>C>S
o Chris: C>S>D>P
o Pat: P>C>S>D
S is status quo, Dana proposes amendment (D), Chris proposes amendment to amendment (C), and Pat proposes amendment to Chris’s amendment (P).
Consider the order going from last amendment to first (used in US congressional committees)
1. P vs C→P
2. P vs D→D
3. D vs S→S
S wins, even though everybody prefers C to S.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Arrow’s theorem- Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives

A

Social preferences between multiple options depend only on the individual preferences between those options, and the way individuals rank other options is irrelevant.

e.g. 1: Consider the following preferences
1. B > A > I
2. B > A > I
3. A > I > B
4. A > B > I
Using Borda Count: if there are N alternatives, each individual gives N-1 to the first ranked alternative, N-2 to the second, and so on. Then we add the votes.
o A=6votes
o B=5votes
o I=1vote
Here, A is socially preferred to B.
e.g.1bis: Now assume that we introduce a new alternative, D
1. B > D > A > I
2. B > D > A > I
3. A > I > B > D
4. D > A > B > I

o	A=7votes
o	B=8votes
o	I=2votes
o	D=7votes
With D, social ranking between A and B is reversed.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Implications of Arrow’s Theorem

A
  • ‘National Interest’ is a questionable concept

- It is impossible to aggregate individual preferences in a way that makes sense

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Four perspectives of IR

A
  • Realism/Neorealism
    Grounded in failure of The League of Nations
    Reflective of a strongly unitary state as in absolute monarchy or tyranny
    Focused on conflict rather than cooperation
  • Liberalism
    Grounded in Wilsonian optimism
    Focused on cooperation rather than conflict
  • Constructivism
    Concerned with preference formation
    Focused on norms and socialization
  • Strategic
    Grounded in game theory/strategic interaction
    Focused on interplay of domestic and international interactions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Realism/ Neorealism

basics

A

War is the natural state of affairs

17
Q

Realism/ Neorealism

Assumptions

A
  • International politics is anarchic
  • States are rational, unitary actors. They are key to international politics.
  • States try to maximize their security above all else, and consider other factors only after security is assured.
  • States try to increase their power so long as doing so does not place their security at risk.
18
Q

Realism/ Neorealism

Hypotheses

A
  • Bipolarity more stable than multipolarity
  • War is avoided by balancing power (deterrence)
  • Alliances are a way to balance power/protect security
19
Q

Liberalism

Basics

A

International politics concerns the international political economy (trade, organizations) rather than focusing only on problems related to security

20
Q

Liberalism

Assumptions

A
  • States are rational unitary actors
  • International politics are hierarchical, not anarchic
  • States seek cooperation and wealth
  • Cooperation is the natural state of affairs between states
  • Power distributions are less important than shared interests
    Cooperation is advanced through norms & regimes:
    • Norms are generally observed patterns of conduct
    • Regimes are international laws, rules, and organizations designed to promote coordination and cooperation among nations with shared interests
21
Q

Liberalism

Hypotheses

A
  • States pursue wealth and security
  • Cooperation is improved when there is a dominant state
  • Alliances reflect shared interests and so are long-lived
  • International law and strong norms promote cooperation even when states are called on to act against their short-term interests
22
Q

Constructivism

Basics

A

State or national objectives are constructed

23
Q

Constructivism

Process

A

Legitimation, Role Redefinition, Reflection

  • International norms
  • Identity forms through domestic exercises of power
24
Q

Constructivism

Assumptions

A
  • Initial leader actions are strategic – seek legitimacy
  • Later, external pressure and socially-accepted norms alter self-perception (Role Redefinition)
  • Reflection alters one’s sense of self-interest.
25
Q

Constructivism

Hypotheses

A

a) instrumental short-term changes in behavior lead to long-term changes in preferences and actions
b) confronted with international pressure to abide by the norm of conduct to which they give rhetorical support, leaders change their behavior and respect the norm of conduct to which they agreed

26
Q

Strategic Perspective

Basics

A

Leaders care about themselves, the national interest is subordinate to personal interests

27
Q

Strategic Perspective

++

A
  • International relations cannot be separated from domestic politics
    • If a foreign policy will be beneficial for a nation in the long term but in the short run will result in the leader’s ouster, then that policy is not pursued
  • Relations between nations and between leaders are driven by strategic considerations
    • Leaders pick the policy they believe will produce the best outcome for them
    • They know that domestic and foreign rivals are doing the same

Polsci II (4 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions