Knowledge clip lecture 5 Flashcards

1
Q

you can measure work performance through 4 ways, which ways?

A
  • productivity
  • in-role performance
  • extra-role performance
  • counterproductive work behavior
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what is procedural justice?

A

perceived fainess of the process and methods used by an organisation to make decisions, distribute resources and resolve disputes
- fairness of decision-making process rather than the outcomes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is distributive justice?

A

perceived fairness of the outcomes or distribution of resources, rewards and responsibilities within an organisation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

study on organisational justice and productivity loss, due to sickness absence and presenteeism
- examined longitudinal relationships between organisational justice and sickness absence and productivity loss
- complete panel design

what were important results?

A
  • feeling not enough appreciated increased productivity loss a year later
  • on the other hand: it was seen that productivity loss increased the perceived fairnes of the appreciation –> so reducing your productivity might help regain acuity after experiencing a period of feeling unappreciated
  • unfair appreciation increased sickness absence (and vice versa)
  • give a negative spiral
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

organisational health policies, looking at the trichotomy

A
  • person: workplace health promotion WHP
  • work: occupational safety and health OSH
  • organisation: comprehensive health policy (CHP)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

another study examined how health policy influences dedication of employees, measured several job resources as explanatory variables

what was main result?

A

healthy policy would enhance resources and therefore work engagement of employees as well

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

example of health policy in a longitudinal design, 3 anual measurements (complete panel design)

what were the main results?

A
  • health policy improves job satisfaction and reduces burnout and absence
  • burnout and sickness absence reinforce each other over time
  • health policy has no effects that could ‘backfire’
  • health policy positive effect on dedication
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

when evaluating the effects of an intervention, the best design is randomized controlled trial (not always possible), then quasi-experiment, then pre post-test experiment

what is the timeline of the evaluation of an intervention?

A
  • orientation phase
  • pre test phase
  • process evaluation
  • post test phase
  • analysis phase
  • feedback phase
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

in analyzing the effects of an intervention, you need to combine the effect and process evaluation: you need to determine who, and to what extent, individual employees were exposed to the intervention: what was the participation?

what do you do?

A
  • multiple regression to test STABILITY between pretest and posttest
  • test extent to which there is SELECTION in the exposure to the intervention
  • EFFECT, so whether the exposure contributes to the posttest

use of ODDS RATIO: OR = 1 –> no relationship

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

why focus on process evaluation when evaluating an intervention, rather than effect evaluation?

A
  • explicit information about why program failed
  • gives feedback about improvement
  • implement intervention in other settings
  • interpret outcomes of intervention
  • insight in working mechanisms
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what is according to Nielsen & Randall a common mistake in evaluation organisational level interventions?

A

focus on effect evaluation rather than process evaluation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what does the article propose?

A

model for process evaluation that focuses on understanding how interventions are designed, implemented and perceived

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

authors break the model down into three levels, each representing critical aspects that should be evaluated to understand the full dynamics of the intervention

what are the 3 levels?

A
  • intervention design and implementation
  • intervention context
  • mental models
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what is phase 1: intervention design and implementation?

A

how intervention was conceptualized, initiated and carried out, important to understand the following:

  • initiation
  • intervention activities
  • implementation strategy
  • roles of key stakeholders (senior and middle management support and employee participation)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what is phase 2: intervention context?

A

focus on organisational and environmental context in which intervention took place

  • omnibus context: broader situational factors (where and when, cultural and structural aspects of organisation)
  • discrete context: specific events or changes that occur during intervention that may influence outcomes
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what is phase 3: mental models?

A

perceptions, attitudes and beliefs of participants and key stakeholders –> determines how stakeholders engage with the intervention

  • readiness for change: are participants ready to change?
  • shared mental models: employees develop shared mental models and this influences how they perceive the intervention
16
Q

what does the article stress mostly?

A

importane of triangulating data from different sources to provide a comprehensive understanding of the intervention process

by adopting a process evaluation framework, researchers and practitioners can gain a more nuanced understanding of why intervention succeed