Key Terms Flashcards

1
Q

Qualia

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Intentionality

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Moral Cognitivism

A

Claims that ethical language expresses ethical beliefs about how the world is, that can be true or false.
We can use reasoning or evidence to discover whether an ethical claim is true or false.
Mind to world, Must change my mind to reflect the true facts of ethics that exist out there in the world.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Moral Non-Cognitivism

A

Claims that ethical language does not try to describe the world and cannot be true or false.
Does not express beliefs abut how the world is, they describe feelings or attitudes.
World to Mind, We can change how the world is to reflect the desires/opinions we have in our mind.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Moral Realism

A

Realist think moral terms actually exist independently of the mind, out there in the world.
Likely to be a cognitivist.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Moral Anti-Realism

A

Anti-realist believe moral terms do not exist in the world, the term refers to something else.
Likely to also be non-cognitivist, cannot be verified as true or false is they don’t exist.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Ethical Naturalism

A

A cognitivist realist position.
Defines moral language in terms of natural properties, morality can be deduced from natural facts within the world and concluded through observation and analysis.
Reductive theory - reduces moral term to natural properties, such as physiological processes. E.g Mill’s proof.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Analytic

A

True in virtue of its definition.
Cannot be denied without logical contradiction.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Synthetic

A

True in virtue of how the world is.
Does not lead to logical contradiction when denied.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Contingent

A

What is the case in our world.
Could have been otherwise.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Necessary

A

Must be the case.
True in every possible world.
Logical contradiction to deny it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

A priori

A

Claims that’s rely on a logical deduction not on sense experience. They are ‘prior to’ sense experience.
For example, a triangle has three sides follows from the definition of the term, not from knowledge things in the world.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Rationalism

A

We can acquire at least some knowledge purely through intuition and deduction. E.g knowledge can be acquired purely through thinking rather than perceptual experience.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Innatism

A

We are already born with some knowledge.
This doesn’t come from perceptual knowledge.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Intuition

A

Ability to know something is true just be thinking about it.
E.g Descartes’ cogito argument.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Deduction

A

A method of deriving the true propositions from other true propositions.

17
Q

Empiricism

A

Argues all a prior knowledge is sorely of analytic truths.
There is no synthetic a priori knowledge.

18
Q

Rationalism

A

Argues not all a priori knowledge is of analytic truths.
There can be at least one synthetic truth known a priori.

19
Q

Moral Realism Breakdown

A

Mind-independent moral properties.

For Non-Naturalism:
Naturalistic fallacy
Open Question Argument
Intuitionism

For Naturalism:
Utilitarianism
Virtue Theory

20
Q

Moral Anti-realism Breakdown

A

Moral properties do not exist.

Error Theory
Emotivism
Prescriptivism

Cognitivist:
Error Theory:
Argument for cognitivist.
Argument from relativity
Argument from queerness

Non-cognitivist:
Emotivism:
A.J Ayer Verification Principle
Hume’s Fork
Motivation of moral judgements
Is/Ought Gap

Prescriptivism:
Hare - Language of Morals