Key Concepts Flashcards

1
Q

Friction

A

Clausewitz’s concept that the mixture of opponents’ actions, unforeseen developments, and unintended consequences cause well-laid military plans to lose relevance and require adjustments.

Contributes to Clausewitz’s view that war is an art and not a science.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

War as Art, not Science

A

Clausewitz’s view that due to friction, fog of war, and the inherent unpredictability of conflict prevent military planners from using an entirely scientific approach to warfighting.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

War as Policy by Other Means

A

Clausewitz’s belief that war was an extension of state policy-making. War was not an abnormal state of affairs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Fog of War

A

Clausewitz’s concept that unpredictability in warfare leads military commanders and policy makers to make decisions based of available information that, by its nature, is limited and flawed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Nature of States in Warfare

A

Clausewitz’s belief that the nature of a state affects how it prosecutes war. Influenced by his observations of the French Republic and its characteristics which enabled mass conscription.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

“The Enemy Gets a Vote”

A

War is an iterative act in which opponents are constantly trying to evolve to counter prevailing military tactics. Derived from Clausewitz’s observations that policy makers and military commanders do not know how their enemies will react to war plans.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Revolution in Military Affairs (RMA): Definition

A

“Occurs when a nation’s military seizes an opportunity to transform its strategy, its military doctrine, its training, organization, equipment, and operations to bring about major change in the nature and conduct of warfare which gives them a great advantage”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Revolution in Military Affairs (RMA): Impact for Policy Makers

A

Actual or perceived superiority alters states’ analysis of the threat environment, odds of success, and desire to use force

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Revolution in Military Affairs (RMA): Case Studies

A

1) Napoleon (political): political organization, levee en masse (draftees)
2) WWII (technological): blitzkrieg and airpower
3) USA 1990s (technological): networked warfare, precision munitions, “American Way of War”
4) Israel in the War against Hizbollah

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Revolution in Military Affairs (RMA): Two Dimensions

A

1) Technological (e.g. WWII blitzkrieg and US in 1990s)

2) Political (e.g. French Republic and Napoleon)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

The Trinity

A

Clausewitz’s belief that successful military policy could only be achieved by harmonizing three political forces:

1) Population: support and provide the people to fight the war
2) Military: skilled commanders needed to plan and execute operations
3) Policy makers: effective provisioners of the effort

All 3 affected by the ambiguity factors (i.e. Fog of War)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Center of Gravity (CoG)

A

Strategic pressure points which combatants can exploit to undermine the efforts of their opponenets. Affecting CoGs will throw opponents off balance, cause fog and friction for them, and accelerate arrival of Churchill’s “unwelcome guests”.

Example: US public opinion during Vietnam. North Vietnam intentionally pursued a campaign of attrition against the US in order to pressure public support against continuing the conflict.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Just War Theory

A

Jus ad bellum

  • Legitimate authority to take nation to war
  • Just cause
  • Last resort

Jus in bello

  • Proportionality
  • Discrimination
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Peace Operations

A

PLEASE UPDATE
Peacekeeping
Definition: Neutral peacekeepers that get involved only when mutually agreed upon by combatant states.
Example: Suez post-1956

Peace Enforcement
Definition: Active enforcement of existing peace agreements up to and including force.
Example: Bosnia 1995 (after initial failure of peacekeeping mission)

Peace Building
Definition: Institution building that goes along with maintaining peace
Example:

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Contrast Liddell Hart with Clausewitz

A

Liddel Hart: Indirect Approach and focus on grand strategy

Clausewitz: direct approach and focus on military operations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Images of Analysis

A

Kenneth Waltz
1st Image
Level of Analysis: Individual

War is a product of human nature

2nd Image
Level of Analysis: The State

War is caused by state behavior



3rd Image
Level of Analysis: System Level

War is caused by anarchic intl system  global government



17
Q

1st Image of Analysis

A

1st Image
Level of Analysis: Individual

War is a product of human nature

Realist view - humans are inherently in conflict

Liberal view - humans learn and evolve, and can cooperate for the sake of security

How We Study: Psychology, Idiosyncratic Approach (looking at specific characteristics of individuals), focus on decision-makers

Theories: ethological, frustration-aggression, socialization, leadership

18
Q

2nd Image of Analysis

A

2nd Image
Level of Analysis: The State

War is caused by state behavior


Realist view: states act in their own security  self interest

Liberal view: with institutions and global law, states can learn to cooperate for global security

How we study: Does state size, type, or location influence foreign policy behavior? Will more democracy equal fewer wars?

Theories: statist, state economic, externalization, democratic peace

19
Q

3rd Image of Analysis

A

3rd Image
Level of Analysis: System Level

War is caused by anarchic intl system  global government

Realist view: lack of central government means states focus on their own security

Liberal view: build international institutions to create global governance

How we study: measure distribution of power in the international system (polarity, equilibrium)


Theories: polarity/distribution of power, anarchical nature of international system, economic, environmental/resource explanations