Kantian Ethics Flashcards

1
Q

Categorical Imperative

A

an unconditional moral obligation that is binding in all circumstances and is not dependent on a person’s inclination or purpose.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Hypothetical Imperative

A

a moral obligation that applies only if one desires the implied goal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what are the three formulations of categorical imperative

A
  • universal law (can you rationally will everyone to do what you do?)

-the end in itself - mere means to an end

  • kingdom of ends (harmonious society)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Three postulates

A
  • free will
  • immortality
  • god
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

why must there be a god and immortality of the soul

A
  • because some good people are not rewarded in life and some bad people are which is unjust
  • for ethics to work there must be a God to let us into an afterlife to be rewarded and reach summon bonum
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

summum bonum

A

the highest good

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

did Kant agree with hypothetical imperatives

A

no, people did not have to do these
not an absolute moral law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Deontological Ethics

A

system of decision-making that focuses on the moral principles of duty and rules

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

‘duty for duties sake’

A

only morally good motivation for doing an action is duty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Hume’s meta-ethics vs Kant

A

P1 - moral judgements are intrinsically motivating
P2 - reason is not intrinsically motivating
C1 - therefore moral judgements cannot be derived from reason alone

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How does Kant respond to consequentialist arguments

A

everyone is responsible for their own actions so if u lie to protect someone from a nazi u r simply acting as tho u r responsible for their behaviour
- cannot control consequences so cannot be responsible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Bernard Williams on emotions (argument)

A
  • inhuman and ethically wrong for moral judgement to be free from emotion

BUT Kant - something is right or wrong regardless of how a person might feel

BUT - impossible to act without any influence of emotion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Clashing duties and the example

A

-if method produces clashes it cannot discover a duty
e.g. a man that has to go to war to fight for his country but also stay home to help his sick mother

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Kant’s response to clashing duties argument

A

if a duty clashes u have not used reason properly
- perfect duties (one way of fulfilling) vs imperfect duties (multiple ways of fulfilling)

  • e.g. go to war and pay for a carer for the mother or stay home and help war effort by working at a factory
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly