Kantian Ethics Flashcards
Weaknesses of Kantian Ethics
It does not seem to account for the complexities of life – universalisability cannot work as no two situations are the same.
For example, would you tell a known murderer where his victim was? (Kant says we have to.)
It does not account for any particular duty we may have for certain people (e.g. family).
It does not account for times when two absolutes clash.
Some would say that sometimes human life has to be sacrificed to stop others or more people being killed or suffering.
Moral law
Binding moral obligations
A priori knowledge
Knowledge is not dependent on sense experience
Autonomy
The belief that we are self-directed beings, able to make our own free choices
Duty
Duties are created by the moral law
Deontological ethics
Ethical systems which ignore outcomes and focuses on the action itself – duty based ethics
Hypothetical imperative
What we do to achieve a particular goal ‘if….then…’. There is no requirement to follow this.
Categorical imperative
This is what reason teaches us must always be done – unconditional moral obligation
Immorality
The belief that we live forever in the afterlife
Postulate
A principle so evident that it needs no further justification. Taken as an assumption
Summum Bonum
The highest, most supreme good
Good will
A person of good will is a person who makes decisions according to the moral law
Kingdom of ends
An imagined future in which all people act in accordance to the moral law
3 formulations of the Categorical imperative
Universalisability, Treat people as means not ends, Kingdom of ends
3 Postulates
We must be free to be able to make decisions.
There must be an afterlife (or immortality) for us to be able to achieve the summum bonum.
God must exist in order to be a fair judge to bring us to the afterlife or not.