Issues & Debates Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Universalism

A

A trait is an underlying human characteristic so conclusions can be applied to everyone

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Essentialism

A

Differences are inevitable because of the ‘fixed’ nature of a group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Types of gender bias

A

Alpha bias, beta bias, androcentrism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Gender bias: alpha bias

A

Differences between men & women are exaggerated (M+F characteristics emphasized)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Gender bias: alpha bias (strengths)

A

Led to Gilligan to assert worth + valuation of ‘feminine qualities’

Led to healthy criticism of cultural values that praise certain ‘male’ qualities (aggression, individualism) as desirable, adaptive and universal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Gender bias: alpha bias (limitations)

A

Focus on differences between genders so ignores many ways women differ from each other

Sustain prejudices + stereotypes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Gender Bias: beta bias

A

Differences between men and women are minimised
When findings obtained from men are applied to women without additional validation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Gender Bias: Beta bias (strengths)

A

Makes people see men and women same led to equal treatment in legal terms + equal access to education/employment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Gender Bias: Beta bias (limitations)

A

Draws attention from differences in power

Egalitarian approach results in major misrepresentation of both genders

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Gender Bias: Androcentrism

A

Taking male thinking/ behaviour as normal, regarding female thinking/ behaviour as deriant, inferior, abnormal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Gender example: alpha bias

A

Freudian Psychosexual Development
- males develop castration anxiety in phallic stage resolved by identifying with father developing super ego
- females cannot experience + Freud argued this resuls in females developing weaker morality + being inferior
- feminity is failed masculinity + girls experience penis envy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Gender example: Beta bias

A

Moral Development (Kohlberg)
- value of justice + everyone goes through set stages of moral reasoning HOWEVER based on male sample
- opponents (Gilligan) argued female morality centred on care - according to K’s theory females be at lower level of moral reasoning thus devaluing them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Gender Bias in research processes

A

Use of standardised procedures in research studies (most methodologies based on standardised treatment of PPs - assumes men ad women respond same way)

Institutional sexism (although female psychology students outnumber male, at senior teaching/ research level in university men dominate) (research agenda follows male conerns)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Reducing gender bias in psychology

A

Drawing attention to sources of bias and under-researched areas in psychology like childcare, sexual abuse, prostitution

Feminist psychology performed valuable functions of reducing institutionised gender bias

Equal opportunity legislation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Gender bias: the feminist perspective

A

View women as normal humans, not deficient to men

Skepticism towards biological determinism

Research agenda focusing on women’s concerns

A psychology for women rather than of women

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

culture bias: key words

A

cultural relativism (appreciating behaviour varies between cultures)
ethnocentrism (emphasising importance of one’s own culture’s values over others)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

culture bias: Pike

A

proposed 2 ways of doing research
1. etic approach (look at group from ‘outside’ using standard of our culture)
2. emic approach (looking at group from inside)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

culture bias: Berry

A

argues psychology guilty of imposing etics: pushing values onto other cultures assuming they are universal norms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

overview of culture bias

A

psychology predominantly white Euro-American enterprise (64% researchers from US) (90% studies have US participants) (samples predominantly white middle-class)

incorporated particular worldview (Western) into ways it tries to understand people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Alpha Bias: culture example

A

individualist-collectivist divide (western more indiv + eastern group-focused)

leads to theories being adapted for other cultures based on assumption they behaviour differently

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Culturally Biased Research: Ainsworth

A

Strange Situation ethnocentrism: based on American-British views of child-parent relationships
separation anxiety varies cross-culturally (Germany avoidant (parents focused independence) / Japan resistant (parenting focusers interdependent))
etic approach, using US/UK values as reference point

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Culture Bias example: US Army Intelligence Testing

A

before WW1, US army used IQ test which contained questions about culture & sports that only white majority understanding meaning AA low scores strengthening damaging stereotype + impacted majority’s view on this group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Culture Bias example: IQ testing (Eysenck)

A

designed to measure European person’s understanding of what intelligence is, not valid measurement of intelligence of other continents
non-westerners disadvantages and viewed as inferior

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Culture Bias: Alpha Bias negative and positive consequences

A
  • devaluing 1 culture; overlooking what makes us similar
    + research finds culture differences improve understanding
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Culture Bias: beta bias negative and positive consequences

A
  • overlooking difference where they can exist can make it harder for 1 culture
    + minimising differences can improve equality + access if everyone treated same
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Culture Bias: Reducing & Modern Approaches

A

equal opportunity (legislation aim to rid psychology of culture bias/racism)

reflexivity (ability to reflect own potential bias/subjectivity and effect on research)

indigenous psychology (movement associated with ‘native’ psychologists developing theories for own culture)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Gender Bias: Worrell & Remer

A

following should be considered:
1. women not ‘subjects’ but genuinely ‘participate’ e.g. self-report & qualitative data
2. within-group differences thus recognising not all females same and different from males
3. recognition behaviour result of dispositional-environmental interaction: gender only 1 factor involved + shouldn’t assign to much value to it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

free will

A

notion human can make choices
may be biological/environmental forces that exert some influence on behaviour but able to reject these forces as masters of our destiny

HUMANISTIC
COGNITIVE - although we have free will, its’s constrained by our circumstances + others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

determinism

A

individuals behaviour shaped/controlled by internal/external forces

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

hard determinism

A

implies free will isn’t possible as our behaviour always caused by internal/external events beyond our control

cause is identifiable

compatible with aims of science (to uncover causal laws that govern thoughts & action)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

soft determinism

A

all events have causes, but behaviour can be determined by our conscious choices in the absence of coercion

William James first to put forward notion

COGNITIVE

32
Q

biological determinsim

A

belief behaviour caused by biological influence we can’t control (genetic, hormonal)

BIOLOGICAL: physiological & neurological processes aren’t under conscious control e.g. influence of autonomic nervous system during periods of stress - lots of behaviours/characteristics thought to have genetic basis + research demonstrated effect of hormones e.g. role of testosterone aggressive - role of COMT and SERT genes in OCD

modern biopsychologists recognise mediating influence of environment on biological structures meaning we are ‘doubly-determined’ in ways we can’t control

33
Q

environmental determinism

A

belief behaviour caused by features of environment we can’t control (system of reward/punishment)

Skinner: all behaviour result of conditioning - behaviour shaped by environmental events & agents of socialisation

Bobo Doll & aggression

34
Q

psychic determinsim

A

belief behaviour caused by unconscious conflicts we can’t control

Freud: influence of biological drives/instincts - behaviour determined & directed by unconscious conflicts repressed in childhood

35
Q

Strengths of determinism

A

consistent with aims of science (led to development of treatments, therapies, behavioural interventions e.g. psychotherapeutic drug treatment controlling & managing schizophrenia)

genetic determinism supported by evidence e.g. Joseph et al: rates for schizophrenia 40% (however demonstrates behaviour not 100% determined by genes)

evidence: Bandura’s Bobo Doll: boys more likely to imitate physical aggression - both biological and environmental contributing factors

36
Q

Weaknesses of determinism

A

hard determinist stance - individual choice not cause of behaviour - not consistent with way legal system operates (court of law, offenders held morally accountable)

unfalsifiable despite scientific credentials - behaviour always exist event though they may not yet have been found suggesting determinist approach to behaviour not as scientific

mental illness - ignores treatment like therapy

37
Q

Strengths of free will

A

face validity (makes cognitive sense) - everyday experience gives impression we constantly exercise free will

research - people with internal LOC tend to be more mentally healthy - Roberts et al: adolescents with strong belief in fatalism significant greater risk depression suggesting even if we don’t have free will the fact we think we do has positive impact on mind/behaviour

emphasises important of individuals + studying individual differences

fit’s society’s view of personal responsibility e.g. if you break law you’ll be punished

38
Q

Weaknesses of free will

A

neurological studies of decision making
Libet et al: brain activity determines outcome of simple choices may predate our knowledge of having made choice - found activity related to whether to press button with left/right hand occurs in brain up to 10 secs before participants report being consciously aware of decision showing even most basic experiences of free will decided + determined by brain before we become aware of them

subjective + some argue it doesn’t exist

impossible to scientifically test concept

39
Q

Scientific Determinism

A

belief events have cause

IV manipulated to observe effect on DV - if there’s change we logically infer cause & effect

in order to infer causation, extraneous variables must be controlled - lab

emphasis on causal explanations allows us to come up with general laws and predict/control future events

40
Q

nature

A

nature: inherited, innate factors (genetic) BIOLOGICAL

early nativists (Rene Descartes) argued human characteristics are innate: result of heredity

41
Q

nature-nurture: interactionism

A

heredity (nature) + environment (nurture) have influence on each other

42
Q

nature-nurture: epigenetics

A

change in genetic activity without changing genetic code e.g. smoking

43
Q

nature-nurture: heredity

A

genetic transmission of mental & physical characteristics from one generation to another

44
Q

nature-nurture: the interactionist approach

A

idea nature-nurture linked to such extent it doesn’t make sense to separate two so researchers study how they interact & influence each other

45
Q

nurture

A

environment (socialisation experience) BEHAVIOURIST (tabula rasa - John Locke)

Lerner identified different levels of the environment: defined in narrow pre-natal terms (mothers physical/psychological state during pregnancy) or post-natal experiences (social conditionings + cultural/historical context)

46
Q

nature-nurture: equal debate

A

heritability coefficient used to assess heredity - numerical figure ranging from 0-1.0 indicating extent to which characteristic has genetic basis

figure for heritability is IQ is around 0.5 across multiple studies in varying populations suggesting both genetics & environment important factors in intelligence

Lerner: environmental influence in child’s lift as soon as born - nature-nurture so closely intertwined makes little sense to separate e.g. twin studies difficult to tell whether high concordance rates result of shared genetics or shared upbringing)

Interactionist approach: attachment patterns are ‘two-way street’ (child’s innate temperament influence parents response + their responses affect child’s behaviour) thus natures creates nurture; heredity & environment interact

Diathesis-stress model: suggests psychopathology caused by genetic vulnerability (diathesis) which only expressed when coupled with environmental trigger

Epigenetics: 3rd element to debate - smoking/diet/pollution leave epigenetic ‘marks’ on DNA - tells bodies which genes to ignore/use + may go on to influence children

47
Q

Diathesis-stress model: Pikka Tienari et al

A

group of Finnish adoptees those most likely to develop schizophrenia has biological relatives with history of disorder (vulnerability) + had relationships with adoptive families defined as ‘dysfunctional’ (trigger)

48
Q

Epigenetics: Dias & Ressler

A

male lab mice electric shock when exposed to smell of acetophenone - fear reaction to smell-rat’s kids feared smells & grandkids

49
Q

weaknesses of nature argument

A

extreme determinist stance led to controversy that which attempted to link race, genetics, intelligence

50
Q

strength of nurture argument

A

behaviourist - behaviour shaping had practical application in therapy (desirable behaviours reinforced/undesirable behaviours punished/ignored)

51
Q

strength of interactionist approach to nature nurture debate

A

genotype-environment interaction: Scarr & McCartney theory of gene-environment include 3 types
1. passive interaction (parents genes influence way they treat children (musically gifted liked to play to child + encouraged music))
2. evocative interaction (child’s genes influence environment in which they grow up (musically talented picked for school concerts))
3. active interaction (child creates own environment through the people + experience it selects (child chooses similar musically talented friends + seeks out musical experiences)

52
Q

weakness of interactionist approach to nature-nurture debate

A

idea of shared & unshared environment - influence of environment complicated by fact siblings raised with same family may not have shared same upbringing - suggests individual differences mean siblings experience life events differently - explain finding MZ twins reared together don’t show perfect concordance rates supporting view heredity + environment can’t be meaningfully separated

53
Q

holism

A

only makes sense to study an indivisible system rather than constituent parts

HUMANISTIC saw successful therapy as bringing together all aspects of whole person

54
Q

reductionism

A

belief human behaviour best explained by breaking it down into smaller constituent parts

based on scientific principle of parsimony (all phenomena explained using most basic (lower level) principles)

55
Q

biological reductionism

A

attempts to explain social & psychological phenomena at lower biological level e.g. actions of genes, hormones

work backwards e.g. drugs that increase serotonin found to be effective treating OCD therefore working backwards, low serotonin cause of OCD - have reduced OCD to level of neurotransmitter activity

56
Q

environmental reductionism

A

attempt to explain behaviour in terms of stimulus-response links that have been learned through experience

BEHAVIOURIST explain behaviour in terms of conditioning focused on simple stimulus-response links, reducing behaviour to these elements

e.g. learning theory of attachment reduces idea of love (between baby & mother) to learned association between mother (neural stimulus) & food (UCS) resulting in pleasure (CR)

57
Q

Holism vs Reductionism - levels of explanation in psychology

A

different ways of viewing same phenomena in psychology

e.g. OCD understood in socio-cultural context as producing behaviour that people regard as odd/irrational - psychological level anxiety, physical level compulsions, environmental/behavioural level learning experiences, physiological level abnormal functioning in frontal lobes, neurochemical level underproduction of serotonin

each level more reductionist

58
Q

weaknesses of holism

A

lacks practical value - holistic accounts of human behaviour hard to use as become complex e.g. if we accept many factors contributing to depression difficult to know which most influential

59
Q

strengths of reductionist

A

scientific approach (objective &reliable) - need to operationalise variables) e.g. Strange Situation operationalised separation anxiety

60
Q

weaknesses of reductionist

A

oversimplify - decreases validity - explanations that operate at the level of gene/neurotransmitter don’t include analysis of social context

only understood at higher level - aspects of social behaviour that only emerge within group context + can’t be understood in terms of individual group members e.g. Stanford Prison experiment

61
Q

idiographic

A

focus on individual + recognition of uniqueness

private, subjective + conscious experiences

no general laws possible because of chance, free will, uniqueness of individuals

everyone unique + therefore everyone studied in individual way

62
Q

nomothetic

A

attempts to establish laws + generalisations about people

objective knowledge through scientific methods + experiments

quantitative methods

63
Q

idiographic methods of investigation

A

qualitative data
case study, unstructured interviews, self-reports, autobiographies, personal documents
examples: HUMANISTIC (studying individual + conscious experiences) PSYCHODYNAMIC (Freud’s use of case studies)

64
Q

strengths of idiographic

A

more complete or global understanding of individual from in-depth qualitative methods

complement nomothetic approach in adding detail/understanding to general laws

focuses mean individual feels valued & unique

real-life application: HM - brain damaged individual - finding may reveal important insights about normal functioning

65
Q

weaknesses of idiographic

A

difficult to generalise from narrow, detailed subjective knowledge about one person

regarded as non-scientific as subjective experience cannot be empirically tested

neglects biological especially genetic influences

Freud: many of key concepts e.g. Oedipus complex developed from detailed study of single case - generalisations can’t be made without farther examples

66
Q

examples of idiographic

A

e.g. Rodgers & Maslow: phenomenological approach to study human beings + interested in documenting conscious experience of individual or ‘self’

e.g. psychodynamic approach because Freud’s use of case study when detailing lives of patients - however Freud assumed he identified universal laws of behaviour & personality development (nomothetic approach)

67
Q

examples of nomothetic

A

BEHAVIOURIST, COGNITIVE, BIOLOGICAL

Skinner: studied responses of hundreds of rats, cats, pigeons to develop laws of learning

cog: infer structure/processes of human memory by measuring performance of large samples of people in lab tests

bio: countless brain scans conducted on human brains to make generalisations about localisation of function

68
Q

strengths of nomothetic

A

scientific - testing under standardised conditions, using data sets that provide group averages, statistical analysis, prediction & control e.g. in field of IQ testing

enabled psychologists to establish norms of ‘typical’ behaviour e.g. average IQ of 100, arguably giving discipline of psychology greater scientific credibility

69
Q

weaknesses of nomothetic

A

accused of ‘losing whole person’

knowing there is 1% lifetime risk of developing schizophrenia tells us little about what life is like with disorder

lab studies involving test treats participants as scores rather than individual + subjective experience of people ignored - overlooks richness of human experience

70
Q

social sensitivity

A

Sieber & Stanely defined as ‘studies with potential consequences either directly for participants or for class of individual represented’

e.g. genetic basis of criminality

attract attention from psychologists, media, public

Aronson: shouldn’t lead to ‘shying away’ instead because of undoubted importance of research, psychologists may have social responsibility to carry it out

70
Q

ethical implications

A

impact psychological research may have in terms of the rights of others

ethical guidelines established to protect

concern with wider ethical implications - may exercise control over methods but little say in how finding represented, impact on public policy + how it may influence perception of particular groups

71
Q

Ethical issues in socially sensitive research

A

Sieber & Stanely identified concerns to be mindful of when conducting SSR

implications: wider effects should be considered - some may be seen giving ‘scientific’ credence to prejudice/discrimination - may be difficult to predict at start

uses/public policy: what is it likely to be used for? what would happen if used for wrong purpose? findings may be adopted by government for political ends/shape public policy

validity of the research: some findings presented as objective turned out highly suspect/fraudulent - many modern social constructionist researchers more up-front about biases/preconceptions + include comment on reflective nature of their work

72
Q

benefits of socially sensitive research

A

Scarr: studies of underrepresented groups + issues may promote greater sensitivity/understanding - help reduce prejudice + encourage acceptance

benefitted society: research into (un)reliability of EWT has decreased risk of miscarriages of justice

73
Q

evaluation of socially sensitive research and ethical implications: framing the question

A

Sieber & Stanely: way research questions phrased/investigated influence way findings interpreted

e.g. cross-cultural research may be blighted by cultural superiority + ethnocentrism

Kitzinger & Coyle: research into ‘alternative relationships’ guilty of form of ‘heterosexual bias’ within which homosexual relationships compared/judged against heterosexual norms
suggests must approach research with ‘open mind’ + be prepared to have preconceptions challenged

74
Q

evaluation of socially sensitive research and ethical implications: who gains

A

used by government/other institutions to shape social policy despite dubious nature + without full consideration of moderating effects of environment on characteristics (intelligence)