issues & debates Flashcards
Freewill
having the power to make your own choices about your behaviour.
Determinism
behaviour is controlled by external or internal factors
Hard determinism
the view that all behaviour can be predicted as freewill is not possible (causal explanation)
Soft determinism
the view that behaviour does have causes but there is an element of freewill.
Biological determinism
the belief that behaviour is caused by biological influences e.g. genes, hormones, evolution.
Environmental determinism
the belief that behaviour is caused by features of the environment e.g. reward & punishment.
Psychic determinism
the belief that behaviour is caused by unconscious conflicts.
If it can be argued that human behaviour is deterministic, what is the benefit for the field of psychology?
Determinism is consistent with the aims of science. The idea that human behaviour is orderly & obeys laws places psychology on the same level as other established sciences. In addition, if we can predict & control human behaviour, we can develop treatments & therapies that benefit many people, e.g. drug treatments for OCD & systematic desensitisation for phobias.
Studies into OCD have found a 68% concordance rate for MZ twins. What does this tell us about biological determinism? What does the statistic tell us about environmental determinism?
It is unlikely that 100% genetic determination will ever be found for a behaviour. No studies comparing concordance rates for MZ twins have ever found 100% concordance. E.g. OCD = 68%, IQ = 70%, Aggression = 72%. This shows that although there is a genetic vulnerability, there must be another additional cause. Therefore biological determinism cannot be correct as it is not genes alone causing these characteristics. BUT the fact that MZ concordance rates are always higher than DZ concordance rates does show that genetics are important and that the environment cannot be a sole cause of behaviour. This therefore argues against the case of environmental determinism. Therefore a better approach would be the diathesis – stress model which argues against any one type of determinism causing behaviour.
The idea of determinism is not consistent with the way our legal system works. Why not? But are there any types of people for whom this argument might be used in court?
Determinism is not compatible with the way our legal system works as criminals are usually held personally & morally accountable for their crimes. Only in extreme cases is ‘The law of diminished responsibility’ applied. This is when it is assumed that a defendant has not been able to act under their own freewill. E.g. in cases of self defence, mental illness & ‘crimes of passion’ (when a judgement of temporary insanity can be made)
How do you think locus of control has been linked to freewill? How could this then be linked to mental health?
A positive aspect of believing in freewill is that it leads to better mental health. Internal LoC believe they have a high level of control over their own lives & behaviours. They also tend to have better mental health than people with external LoC, Roberts et al (2000): found adolescents with a strong belief in fatalism (that their lives were controlled by external factors - determinism) were at greater risk of depression. So even if we don’t have freewill, the fact that we think we do has a positive impact on our mind & behaviour.
Some have suggested that freewill is just an illusion. What do you think this means?
Skinner argues that being able to decide between different courses of action is not freewill but may give us the illusion of having freewill. E.g. a person might ‘choose’ to see a particular film but in fact this choice is determined by previous reinforcement experiences. E.g. seeing an advert on TV, talking to friends.
Some have suggested that freewill is just an illusion. What study did we look at last lesson that supports this?
Libet recorded activity in the motor cortex BEFORE the person had a conscious awareness of the decision to move their finger. Therefore the brain activity comes before we have knowledge of our decision to make the movement.
Suggests even our most basic experiences of freewill are decided & determined by our brain before we are aware of them.
approaches linked to freewill
Humanism
approaches linked to determinism
scientific
Ethics
A consideration of what is acceptable or right behaviour in the pursuit of a personal or scientific goal.
Ethical guidelines
protection from harm, avoiding deception, fully informed consent, debriefing, right to withdraw, privacy and confidentiality.
Ethical implications
the impact psychological research may have in terms of the rights of other people, especially the participants.
Socially sensitive research
studies in which there are potential social consequences or implications, either directly for the Ps or the group of individuals represented by the research.
Ethical Implications of Research
In Psychology ethical guidelines are important to help protect those involved in research. Psychologists must consider the balance between the need to gain valid research and the rights of the participants. Ethical implications refer to the effects or consequences of research studies and theories on the participants.
Socially sensitive issues
Sieber and Stanley used the term social sensitivity to describe studies where they are potential social consequences for the participants or the group of people represented by their research. They identified 4 aspects in the scientific research process. Which should be considered when conducting research to ensure it is not socially sensitive.
- The research question:
The researcher must consider their research question carefully. Asking questions like ‘are there racial differences in IQ?’ or ‘is intelligence inherited?’ may be damaging to members of a particular group.
Conduct of research and treatment of participants
The researcher needs to consider the treatment of the participants and their right to confidentiality. For example, if someone admits to committing a crime should the researcher maintain confidentiality?
The institutional context:
The researcher should be mindful of how the data is going to be used and consider who is funding the research. If the research is funded by a private organisation, why are they funding the research and how do they intend to use the findings?
E.g. Glaxosmith Klein drug company knowingly withheld results of their clinical trials which showed that the anti-depressant drug seroxat could increase the risk of suicide and violence in children and teenagers, just so they could sell more drugs.