Introduction to Famines Flashcards
define ‘famine’
‘famine is a socio-economic process which causes the accelerated destitution of the most vulnerable. marginal and least powerful groups in a community, to a point where they can no longer, as a group, maintain a sustainable livelihood’
act of god approach to famine
isolates famine from other social, political and economic issues and places it in category of natural disasters
act of man view to famine
places famine on continuum with hunger, poverty and a social deprivation and argues that famine is consequence of human activity
- can be prevented by modified behaviour and economic and political interventions
why does devereux argue that few if any recorded famines can be blamed on forces outside human influence?
1) few famines where rich have starves
2) no recent famine could not have been averted by taking food from somewhere else
3) correlation between famine and climate is weaker than that between poverty or war and famine
- similar climate in US and australia but no famine
two famine theories
FAD
- food availability decline
FED
- food entitlement decline
why does FAD theory not stand up to close scrutiny?
1) natural disasters disrupt production not distribution
- assumes closed economy
2) rich rarely die in famines
- so some groups have better access to food
3) drought leads to famine is too simplistic
- we know there are insurance mechanisms and coping strategies
drought only leads to famine if…
- severe and protracted
- in tandem with other threat such as war
- coping strategies undermined or exhausted
- inappropriate or late interventions
malthusian (1798) view
famine is question of excess of population over means of subsistence
- starvation is natural check on population growth
why is famine not a malthusian leveller?
1) only few die
- young and middle aged survive and almost all famines followed by ‘baby boom’ which compensates for excess deaths
- therefore resources and population still not level
2) failed to predict agricultural and transport revolution
- raised food production and improved food distribution
3) challenged by ‘boserup effect’
- population concentration encourages investment in rural infrastructure which reduces vulnerability
beliefs of non-malthusians
1) still argue ‘too many people, too little food’
2) concept of carrying capacity
- relates population to economic viability
- suggests where environment is fragile, famine will follow
3) high population growth perpetuates poverty at household level and famine at regional level by excessive land partition and high dependency ratios
4) death control
- modern medicines keeping people alive with falls in birth rates lagging