Introduction to Enteral Nutrition Flashcards
What is the maximum hang time for closed-system enteral formulas?
1: 24 hours
2: 36 hours
3: 48 hours
4: 72 hours
3: 48 hours
Research concludes that closed-system enteral formulas can hang for a maximum of 48 hours based on manufacturer guidelines.
A 74 year old male patient with history of Alzheimer’s dementia and dysphagia requiring enteral nutrition as sole source of nutrition presents to hospital with fever, hypotension, poor skin turgor and dry mucus membranes. His height is 5’9” and weight is 67 kg. He is receiving 1200mL free water per day from enteral nutrition formula and 400mL from free water flush. His estimated calorie needs are 1800 kcal/day. How should his fluid needs be estimated?
1: 20 mL per kg
2: 1 mL per calorie intake
3: Minimum of 1500mL/day
4: 30 mL per kg
4: 30 mL per kg
The typical formulas utilized to estimate water requirements are energy based (e.g. 1 mL/kcal required) or a weight based per kg body weight (e.g. 25-35 mL/kg). For individuals over the age of 65, some experts discourage the use of energy-based formulas and instead recommend 30mL/kg with a minimum of 1500mL per day, 1500-2000mL/day or use of the Holliday-Segar formula (1500mL for the first 20kg body weight plus 15mL/kg for remaining body weight. Weight based formulas may lead to fluid overload in patients with severe cardiac issues or kidney disease. Additional fluid should be provided for individuals with severe diarrhea or emesis, large draining wounds, paracentesis loses, drains, high gastric, fistula, and ostomy outputs and persistent fevers. Any formula to estimate water requirement is only an estimate; fluid balance and hydration status should be closely monitored.
A 56 year old female with dysphagia who is afebrile and weighs 60 kg is on a standard 1.0 kcal/mL enteral formula at 180 mL/hr over 10 hours nightly. Which of the following volumes of water flushes would best meet her daily estimated fluid requirements?
1: 100 mL
2: 300 mL
3: 600 mL
4: 1000 mL
2: 300 mL
Daily fluid requirements in an afebrile enterally fed patient can be estimated using 30-40 mL/kg or 1 kcal/mL. For this patient, an initial estimate of her daily water requirement would be 1800 mL which corresponds to 30 mL/kg and 1 kcal/mL. Standard enteral formulas are ~84% free water so she would receive ~1.5 L of water from the formula. The remainder (300 mLs) can be given as flushes and/or boluses. Any formula to estimate water requirement is only an estimate; fluid balance and hydration status should be closely monitored.
Which of the following is NOT a perceived benefit of early enteral feeding in critically ill patients?
1: Decreases translocation of gut bacteria
2: Reduces atrophy of intestinal villae
3: Reduces risk for infectious complications
4: Increases intestinal permeability
4: Increases intestinal permeability
Early appropriate enteral tube feeding may prevent the occurrence of bacterial translocation (the passage of bacteria across the intestinal wall), and preserve gut mucosal immunity. Lack of feeding via the gut during critical illness may lead to atrophy of intestinal villi which could predispose the patient to translocation, increase in gut permeability, and potentially increase the risk of infection.
A patient is receiving enteral nutrition during her second trimester of pregnancy. Nutritional assessment data reflect an average maternal weight gain of 0.42 lbs per week, normal fetal growth, an albumin of 2.0 gm/dL, and a nitrogen balance of +2 gm/day. Based on the data provided, which of the following parameters is not useful in assessing the efficacy of enteral nutrition in pregnancy?
1: Maternal weight gain
2: Fetal growth
3: Serum Albumin
4: Nitrogen balance
3: Serum Albumin
Maternal weight gain and fetal growth are the most important factors in assessing the adequacy and efficacy of enteral tube feedings in pregnancy. There is a strong correlation between infant birth weight and maternal weight. Positive nitrogen balance is important in assessing provision of adequate protein. Use of serum albumin is not recommended due to dilutional effects associated with normal plasma expansion and alterations in plasma protein production.
A diabetic patient presents with early satiety, bloating, occasional vomiting, and extensive weight loss. After a thorough GI workup, the patient is diagnosed with gastroparesis. Which type of enteral formula would be more efficacious in this patient?
1: Concentrated, standard, polymeric
2: High fiber
3: Concentrated, high protein, elemental
4: High fat
1: Concentrated, standard, polymeric
Most patients with gastroparesis will tolerate a standard, polymeric formula. A concentrated formula may be used for those patients sensitive to volume. High fat and high fiber enteral formulas may decrease or delay gastric emptying exacerbating gastroparesis symptoms. Elemental formulas are typically indicated for patients with malabsorptive syndromes and/or pancreatic insufficiency. High protein formulas may be used for wound healing and in critical care formulations.
Lactose is a common ingredient in which type of enteral formula?
1: Semi-elemental formula
2: Standard adult formula
3: Standard infant formula
4: Elemental formula
3: Standard infant formula
Lactose is routinely used in standard infant formula to mimic the carbohydrate found in human milk. Most adult medical nutritional products are lactose-free due to the prevalence of lactose intolerance in many populations and because lactase production may be decreased during illness.
Which of the following patient populations would most likely have difficulty tolerating a polymeric enteral formula?
1: Crohn’s disease
2: Chyle leak
3: Gastroparesis
4: Celiac disease
2: Chyle leak
Elemental enteral formulas, which contain individual amino acids and contain <2-3% of total calories from long-chain fatty acids, are ideal for patients with chyle leaks. The goal of nutritional management of patients with chylous effusions is to reduce the quantity and duration of chyle loss. Nutrition management should be started as soon as the chyle leak is suspected. Some controversy exists as to whether patients should be placed directly on parenteral nutrition. However, most investigators recommend determining the patient’s response to an elemental low fat diet before initiating parenteral nutrition. Patients with Crohn’s or celiac disease most often tolerate formulas with intact macronutrients. In severe cases refractory to medical management, trial of an elemental diet may be necessary. Patients with gastroparesis most often tolerate polymeric enteral formula fed into the jejunum.
In patients with pancreatitis, which of the following parameters would be LEAST important in predicting tolerance of enteral feedings?
1: APACHE II score
2: Duration of NPO
3: Abdominal pain
4: Triglyceride level
4: Triglyceride level
The most influential factor in determining tolerance of enteral nutrition in pancreatitis is disease severity as measured by APACHE II scores. Duration of NPO is also important as studies have shown poor tolerance in patients NPO for greater than or equal to 6 days prior to initiation of enteral feeding. Increasing abdominal pain is a clinical indication of enteral feeding intolerance in pancreatitis. Serum triglyceride levels are routinely used to measure tolerance of parenteral rather than enteral nutrition.
Which of the following best describes the rationale for initiating enteral nutrition (EN)?
1: It may be implemented in patients who cannot or will not eat adequately.
2: It is reserved for malnourished patients with an intact gastrointestinal tract.
3: It should be implemented regardless of a patient’s hemodynamics.
4: It is commonly used to treat specific disease manifestations.
1: It may be implemented in patients who cannot or will not eat adequately.
Enteral nutrition may be implemented in patients who cannot or will not eat adequately. Prior to initiating EN, important factors such as ethical issues, the patient and/or family’s wishes, quality of life, risks and benefits of therapy, the patient’s clinical status, diagnosis, and prognosis should be considered. EN should be initiated when patients are expected to (or have) not received adequate oral intake for 7 to 14 days. Duration of EN therapy should not be less than 5 to 7 days in the malnourished adult patients or 7 to 9 days in the adequately nourished adult patients. The initiation of EN is not an emergency and should only be started when patients are fully resuscitated and/or stable.
Tube feedings can be effectively used in which of the following conditions?
1: Intractable obstipation and vomiting
2: High output mid-jejunal fistula
3: Open abdomen
4: Short bowel syndrome (<50cm) without colon
3: Open abdomen
In an open abdomen, the peritoneum is left open and the viscera are protected with a temporary dressing until the abdomen can be closed by performing skin grafting over the exposed peritoneal organs. Numerous studies have demonstrated safety and improved outcomes with administration of enteral nutrition in patients with open abdomen. In patients requiring open abdomen management after laparotomy, parenteral nutrition should be deferred until EN is not tolerated for a period of 7 or more days. Parenteral nutrition should be indicated in patients with high output mid-jejunal fistula, intractable obstipation and vomiting, and short bowel syndrome.
Which of the following is an indication to place a gastrojejunostomy feeding tube?
1: Hyperemesis gravidarum
2: Dysphagia
3: Gastroesophageal reflux
4: Diabetic gastroparesis
4: Diabetic gastroparesis
Gastroparesis is an indication for placing a gastrojejunostomy feeding tube versus a gastrostomy tube. The jejunostomy tube bypasses the stomach thus preventing nausea and vomiting during feeding. The gastric portion can be used for decompression. Research has not supported the need for placement of a gastrojejunostomy tube in patients with hyperemesis gravidarum, gastroesophageal reflux, or dysphagia.
Skin-level or low-profile enteral access devices have many desirable features including
1: can be capped when not in use.
2: can only be placed as an exchange tube.
3: are only used for gastric access.
4: are easily accessed for feedings or medications.
1: can be capped when not in use.
Skin level or low profile devices are often more comfortable and cosmetically more appealing for patients. These devices can be capped when not in use. Skin level or low profile devices require an access connector prior to the administration of medications or feedings which requires adequate manual dexterity. They can be placed as an exchange tube or at the time of initial tube insertion. Newer devices are available for both gastric decompression and/or jejunal feeding. These devices are held in place with an inflated internal balloon or a solid silicone internal retention bolster.
What is the gold standard for determining proper position of a feeding tube placed at the bedside?
1: Radiographic confirmation
2: pH testing for acidity of aspirates
3: Aspiration of enteric contents
4: Air sufflation and auscultation over the gastric bubble
1: Radiographic confirmation
Radiographic confirmation after insertion of a nasoenteric feeding tube is the gold standard for determining proper placement of a nasogastric tube. Recent studies suggest that radiographic confirmation of placement may not be required when electromagnetic imaging technology is utilized for placement. Auscultation, pH testing, aspiration and capnography still require radiographic confirmation.
Placement of a jejunostomy feeding tube would NOT be beneficial for which of the following conditions?
1: Gastroparesis
2: Pancreaticoduodenectomy (Whipple)
3: Short bowel syndrome
4: Chronic pancreatitis
3: Short bowel syndrome
Jejunal feeding would not be beneficial in a patient with short bowel syndrome. Infusion of enteral formula into the jejunum will result in increased stool output and decreased absorption. Slow continuous infusion into the stomach is recommended to maximize absorption and increase intestinal transit time. Jejunal feeding may be beneficial to patients with gastroparesis, post Whipple, and chronic pancreatitis.
Compared to gastric feeding, small bowel feeding is associated with which of the following outcomes in critically ill patients?
1: Longer time to achieve target nutrition
2: Increased nutrient delivery
3: Increased gastroesophageal regurgitation
4: Decreased rate of ventilator-associated pneumonia
2: Increased nutrient delivery
Based on a systematic review of studies comparing gastric and small bowel feeding methods, small bowel feeding is associated with reduced gastric residual volume and reflux, but adequately powered trials are not available to support prevention of aspiration pneumonia. Several studies document increased protein and energy delivery and a shorter time to target rate with small bowel feeding.
Which of the following interventions may assist with the appropriate placement of a nasogastric feeding tube in an alert patient?
1: Administer IV metoclopramide
2: Keep patient NPO during insertion
3: Have the patient flex his head slightly forward
4: Place the patient supine for tube insertion
3: Have the patient flex his head slightly forward
Elevating the head of the bed to a sitting position, having the patient flex his head slightly forward once the tube tip is in the posterior nostril, and asking the patient to swallow small sips of water are all interventions utilized to prevent respiratory misplacement. Proper patient positioning during insertion narrows the airway passage to facilitate esophageal placement. Having the patient swallow during insertion decreases the risk of placing tube into the larynx. IV metoclopramide is a prokinetic agent that may assist with transpyloric tube passage.
Which of the following is LEAST likely to facilitate transpyloric placement of a nasoenteric feeding tube?
1: Endoscopic placement
2: Bedside electromagnetic imaging system
3: Fluoroscopic Placement
4: Weighted tube tips
4: Weighted tube tips
Both fluoroscopic and endoscopic placements have the highest percentage of successful transpyloric passage. Bedside electromagnetic imaging systems have shown greater than 90% success with placement.