Introduction lecture Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

educational psych according to the BPS

A
  • concerned with CYP (0-25) in educational & early years settings
  • supporting others to tackle challenges
  • work in a variety of ways
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

challenges EPs tackle

according to BPS

A
  • learning difficulties & needs
  • social & emotional difficulties & needs
  • mental health concerns
  • issues around disability, diversity & more complex dev needs
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

variety of ways EPs work

according to BPS

A
  • observations
  • interviews
  • assessments
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what is EP according to the DfE

atfeld et al. (2023)

A
  • key role in supporting dev, learning & wellbeing of CYP aged 0-25
  • work with education settings: special schools, alternate provision schools, health and social care, support the most vulnerable CYP & their most complex needs
  • may involve 1-1 work with children, young people & parents/carers, work with schools & other agencies or LA wide initiatives
  • development of EHCPs
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

EHCPs

A
  • introduced in 2014 - part of education reforms for SEN
  • statutory role to play in providing expert info & advice
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

in Cline et al. (2023) what does it say about DfE (2011)

A
  • took a review of ‘EP Training’ looking at role specifically in SEN
  • but also in ‘improving the opportunities of all CYP, both in LA statutory responsibilities & more universal early intervention & preventative support’
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

levels of work for EPs

scottish executive (2002)

A
  • child and family
  • school or establishment
  • LA/council
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

core activities of EPs

scottish executive (2002)

A
  • consultation
  • assessment
  • intervention
  • training
  • research
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

3 levels at which EPs operate

cameron (2006)

A
  1. individual
  2. organisation
  3. system
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

possibilities of what could happen if a EP looks at contemporary psych

cameron (2006)

A
  • closer links to clinical neuropsychology can be made
  • support for children experiencing bereavement
  • reduction in num of YP involved in crime
  • multidisciplinary collaboration for children with autism
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

4 areas of need

domains of interest for EPs

A
  • cog & learning
  • social, emotional & mental health
  • communication & interaction
  • sensory & physical
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Bronfenbrenner’s ecological systems theory

1979

A
  1. microsystem - immediately around
  2. mesosystem - connections between microsystems
  3. exosystem - wider community which indirectly affects ind
  4. macrosystem - broader cultural and societal context
  5. chronosystem - changes over time whether expected or unexpected
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

DECP framework for psychological assessment & intervention

A
  • main focus is for change
  • clarification of problem finds things which might impact child
  • analysis of data (qual or quant)
  • generation of further hypotheses
  • intervention
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

6 stage problem analysis framework (Monsen & Frederickson, 2017)

as cited by cline et al. (2023)

A
  1. collect background information, clarify and expectations
  2. initial guiding hypotheses
  3. identified problem dimensions
  4. problem analysis
  5. agreed action plan
  6. monitoring and evaluation of outcomes
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

guidelines and codes invovled in EP

A
  • HCPC - standards of conduct, performance and ethics, standards of proficiency
  • BPS - code of ethics and conduct
  • DECP - professional practice guidelines
  • AEP

only HCPC is a requirement, AEP for training

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

history of EP as a profession

A
  1. cyril burt (1913) - focus on child and testing
  2. summerfield report (1962) - responsible to LA
  3. warnock report (1978) - specialised support for learning difficulties
  4. SENDA (2002) - how to support SEN
  5. children and family act (2014) - work more with social care
  6. SEND code of practice (2015) - not just schools, other professional
17
Q

key developments for EP

A
  • political context
  • impact of legislative changes
  • impact of tech
  • impact of curriculum changes (2014) - shifted age related expectations, more kids struggle
  • increasing priority given to children’s mental health
  • raising school leaving age
  • role of EPs in promoting ev base that informs our work
  • impact of covid
18
Q

why do we need EPs?

A
  • contributing to statutory services
  • promoting inclusion within & access to education
  • contributing to ‘preventative’ activities
  • trouble-shooting & problem-solving
19
Q

ashton & roberts (2006)

what aspects of EP role considered valuable by SENCos & EPs

A
  • themes most seen = advice giving & statutory assessment work
  • both valued relationship developed by the EP with their link schools
  • SENCos reported statutory assessment as a service unique to EP team
  • diffs: SENCos value traditional EP roles while EPs saw a much wider range of services as valuable
20
Q

EP as scientist-practitioner

Boulder Conference (1949)

A
  • ev-based practice is originally from the field of health
  • in applied psych, it attempts to establish & set out what interventions are likely to work best for who & why
  • but challenges remain including the “giving away of psych” & the political context of EPs work
21
Q

evidence-based practice

A
  • draw upon ev that is likely counter the internal validity threats of sig findings being overlooked (Kirkham et al., 2010) or vice versa
  • need to know ‘what works’ - use systematic reviews. challenges in applying research findings to ‘messy problems’, need for a science of implementation, need for practice-based ev
  • cline et al. (2023): ev-based practice, through systematic analysis, can show the likely effects of particular interventions in diff populations
22
Q

hierarchy of evidence

A
  1. systematic review
  2. randomised controlled trial
  3. controlled study
  4. quasi-experimental study
  5. non-experimental descriptive study
  6. evidence expert committee reports…
23
Q

what did cline et al. (2023) say about controlled studies

A

require thorough & close descriptions of populations and of the procedures in random allocation to groups

torgerson & torgerson (2001)

23
Q

what did cline et al. (2023) say about qualitative methods

A

they are needed to reveal the essential quality of a phenomena often through thematic analysis of speech or text

24
Q

ev-based practice: pragmatic solutions

A
  • drawing on scientific methods
  • hypothesis generation
  • data collection
  • hypothesis testing
  • drawing on practice knowledge
  • ‘hierarchy of methods’ gives precedence to positivist, fixed experimental designs & less weight to those designs founded upon ‘softer’ often qual approaches (Ramey & Grubb, 2009)
25
Q

issues of ev-based practice

A
  • journal articles may omit the qualifiers & contextual detail that curtail & limit their studies
  • practitioners may assume the most recent ev is the most reliable or most pertinent
  • professionals may adopt theoretical preferences (Fox, 2011)
  • UK EPs are trained under arrangement where reviewing large data sets through SLR or meta-analysis is a core skill
  • but extent to which EPs employ these skills to guide their own judgements needs to be researched further
26
Q

what did cline et al. (2023) say were difficulties with ev-based practice models in education

A
  • focus on causal explanations
  • reductionist approaches
  • the possible neglect of population characteristics
  • varying skills of practitioners in implementation
27
Q

frequently occurring areas of dilemma

miller & frederickson (2006)

A
  • the incomplete nature of research findings and theoretical formulations within psych as a basis for understanding the complex problems with which EP are frequently presented
  • the imprecise & tentative relationship often to be found between ‘assessment’ and ‘intervention’ within professional practice
28
Q

SCED

kratochwill et al. (2012)

A
  • single case experimental designs
  • allow measurement progress & change in an ind in response to an intervention (similar to EP work)
29
Q

simplest form of SCED

A
  • AB design
  • A (take baseline)
  • B (introduce intervention)
  • IV = intervention
  • DV = repeated measure of some kind
30
Q

what did cline et al. (2023) say about SCEDs

A
  • in EP they present an opportunity to blend the study of ind responses to their environment whilst drawing wider causal inferences
  • stat inference being at the heart of all SCED
  • allow for achievement of practice-based ev which can extend the insight gained through TME approach whilst also supporting theory building through giving ev of effects of interventions
31
Q

challenges and opportunities when impementing SCED

A
  • within the UK the relationship between EP & natural sciences in complex
  • EPs challenging - scientific activity as unreliable and incompatible with their espoused values
  • approaches perceived to be driven by causal models given complexity of naturalistic education settings
32
Q
A
33
Q

target monitoring and evaluation (TME)

cline et al. (2023)

A

allows practitioners to consider whether progress is following expectation

dunsmuir et al. (2009)