EP assessment in practice Flashcards
what is the point in assessment
- important for accountability
- important to inform teaching & provision
- ability to compare child’s ability to others in the same group
why is assessment in education important
- ‘the most influential factor in whether a poor child grows up to be a poor adult, repeating the cycle from generation to generation, is educational attainment’ - department for work and pensions (2014)
- pupil premium system
- also want to know the value added dimension that our educational providers are making
- also extremely important the progress of children is monitored to ensure that effective interventions are targeted to those who need support
- closing the attainment gap - looking to ‘level up’ opportunity as certain groups of children have greater disadvantages than others
- direct link between poverty & school performance
differences at GCSE & a level
- the gap between gypsy/Roma, travellers of Irish heritage, Black Caribbean and other Black backgrounds can be 10.9 months in terms of English and Maths GCSEs (Hutchinson et al., 2020)
- diffs in overall attainment between diff ethnic groups in the achievement of 3 A grades at A level: 25.7% Chinese, 11% Asian and White
- diffs in attainment of girls vs boys in some subjects (boys may be over-represented at the extremes of the distribution)
- whilst curriculum based assessments may take measures of performance based on objectives derived from the curriculum used in the classroom, they may also be seen as reductionist & as ignoring the affective & social domain
BPS (2022) on education & working class families
- worse educational outcomes than their peers, more pronounced with progression
- use of free school meals at any point within a 6yr span are estimated to lag behind their peers by equivalent of 5 months of learning
- end of primary school this increases to 9 months
- by GCSE level increases to at least 18 months
- at A Level it is on average over 3 full grades lower than their peers
SES & education
- pupils eligible for FSM make less educational progress between ages of 11 & 16 than children not eligible (ONS, 2020)
- % of pupils with FSM had been increasing prior to covid, with increases from 13.6% in jan 2018 to 15.4% in jan 2019, to 17.3% in jan 2020
- increase during first period of pandemic jan 2020-21 rose to 20.8%
- increase to jan 2022 in line with those increases seen prior to pandemic
- rates of FSM eligibility in 2022 highest among pupils in traveller of irish heritage ethnic group (63.3%) & gypsy/roma ethnic group (51.9%)
- rates lowest among pupils of indian (7.5%) & chinese ethnic groups (7.8%)
picture is complex & there are individualities as well as intersections of need
standardised assessments
- psychometric assessments
- curriculum-based assessments
- dynamic assessments
psychometric assessments
standardised assessments
- psychological measurement, scores on a test are compared to a comparison group, so the strength of abilities can be judged relative to other students (norm-referenced)
- not the most reliable
- IQ and g
what did cline et al. (2023) say about psychometric assessments?
use of psychometric assessment to categorise & label children & to inform decisions about provision continues to be debated, both in relation to historical & current practice
what did beaver (2011) say about psychometric assessments?
- when considering learning it is important to also reflect on the level of capability
- this is distinct from inherent ability as assumed to be measured by psychometric approaches
- compare to feuerstein’s instrumental enrichment model
feuerstein’s instrumental enrichment model
beaver (2011)
- provides a constructive approach to intervention & rejects the static concept of ability assumed in traditional psychometric assessment
- based on three broad preconditions for learning
- 1: input - process of gathering & assimilation of info
- 2: elaboration - interpreting & understanding info
- 3: output - reaching & communicating conclusions
curriculum-based assessments
standardised assessments
- concerned with comparing a student’s performance with criterion linked to the local curriculum
- progress may be gathered systematically over time & in a variety of settings using materials employed for instruction (comparing performance in terms of pre-established goals)
- may be gathered through consultation & evaluation results may not be readily generalised
- core subjects: maths, english, science
- Piaget - diff capacities at diff stages of dev, formal operation stage & abstract thinking at 11
- suggests there is a standard population but world is diverse
dynamic assessments
standardised assessments
- less about standardisation & measurement as the assessor is involved in assessment process
- add to the info that school already has
- helps the child during the test - what techniques help e.g. explain further or help reduce anxiety
- how to actually teach the child
what did beaver (2011) say about dynamic assessments?
dynamic assessment is consideration of the dynamics of the learning paradigm & the teaching approaches, or mediation, through which the individual child can be most effectively supported in their learning situation
what did kelly et al. (2017) say about standardised assessments?
- buck (1998) declared that ‘value continues to be placed on standardised measures of cognitive ability’ when deciding on drafting statements and ‘determining provision’
- experimental & strict psychometric methods are completely inadequate for elucidating the complex problem areas that confront them in the social context of human interactions
- kozulin (1998) examines in detail the psychological tools that can be learned, encouraged & employed to facilitate learning, & this emphasis upon mediation is central to the notion of dynamic assessment
place of measurment
standardised assessments
- look at normal distribution
- example of a curriculum based approach, having observed criterion
- not measuring the ‘psyche’ but performance of a skill