Introduction Flashcards

1
Q

5 levels of evidence strength?

A
  1. meta analysis
  2. experimental studies
  3. correlational studies (longitudinal and cross sectional)
  4. qualitative studies
  5. ad hoc personal observations
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

2 most important concepts of study design?

A

validity

reliability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Define validity

A

Are we really measuring what we say we are

measuring?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Define reliability

A

Can our measure produce the same results every
time?
• Provided the thing we are measuring is not subject to change.
• For example, personality is supposed to be a stable trait and therefore a measure of personality should get the same (or very similar) results when a person is tested at different times.
• However, some things such as attitudes can change and the very point of our study may be to see if a certain intervention changes attitudes.
• For example, we might want to see if we can change attitudes to engaging in pro-environmental behaviours.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Existing data advantages

A
  • If open source it is easy to access.
  • Most often does not require lengthy ethical assessments.
  • For certain types of study, it is the only practical source of information (see Lecture 2).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Existing data disadvantages

A

We must think carefully about its validity – is it really a measure of what we think it is?
• Qualitative data needs skilled manipulations - especially in relation to reliability (see Lectures 3 and 4).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Define coding

A

the process of classifying observables such as behaviours into specifically defined categories for data analysis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is a code book/scheme?

A

descriptive document that explains how data has been defined and classified in order to be converted into numerical (often categorical) data

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Na

A

Na

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Observational studies - advantages

A

Observations allow us to study what people actually do.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Observational studies - disadvantages

A

Can generate enormous quantities of qualitative data.
• It can be hard to decide what is important.
• Can be very difficult and time consuming to convert into data.
• Requires experience to develop reliable data coding schemes.
• If the observer is present (or known about) it can change the behaviour of the observed.
• If the observer is not known about it there are a lot of ethical issues to be addressed.
• Because the participants have not given consent to be observed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Questionnaires - advantages

A
  • A relatively large number of people’s responses can be collected.
  • The participants may be widely geographically distributed.
  • Reliable scales can be developed.
  • Scales allow direct comparability between subgroups’ responses.
  • Or direct comparability at two or more different time points.
  • They are less time consuming than interviews.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Questionnaires - disadvantages

A
  • They require a lot of skill to do well.
  • The issues of concern are pre-determined by the researcher.
  • There is no opportunity to explore issues in more depth.
  • They have poor response rates.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Interviews - advantages

A

Allow the researcher to get detailed information about what the participants think.
• Are not totally based on the researchers’ preconceptions and allow follow up of unforeseen issues.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Interviews - disadvantages

A
  • All the same problems as other qualitative data collection techniques, i.e. what to do with large quantities of descriptive data.
  • Responses may be affected by the individual interviewer.
  • Participants may not want to reveal information about sensitive subjects in a one-to-one situation.
  • Very time consuming.
  • Often difficult to make comparisons between participants.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Sorting tasks - advantages

A

Can access the way people think about a specific domain without researchers’ preconceptions.
• Can reveal concepts that participants find difficult to verbalise (e.g. expert knowledge).
• Useful for understanding knowledge outside the researchers’ area of expertise.

17
Q

sorting tasks - disadvantages

A

Difficult to initially develop.
• Time consuming.
• Difficult to analyse.
• Only suitable for small samples of participants.15-25

18
Q

What is a profile?

A

The results sorted items produce against the categorical measures they are assessing.

It shows the way people think about the items