Intro To EMB Flashcards
Evidence based medicine
Patient oriented evidence (POEM)
The evidence based medical literature is reviewed and summarized
Intent is to present evidence based results in a concise and easily readable way that is applicable to clinical practice
Should always review original work for interventions or outcomes affecting patients
Outcomes of care
Outcomes: measurable or observable results of illness or treatment
Outcomes are objective data points
Objective outcomes
Outcomes are objective data points
You do it with our senses, smell, touch and hearing
Subjective outcomes
Comes from subject (patient)
How he/she is experiencing pain
Ask 1-10 how pain is
Categories of outcomes
Outcomes that matter:
Morbidity Mortality Pain Quality of life Pain
Surrogate outcomes - not directly measure outcome (indirectly)
Physiological
Laboratory
Biological - genetic disposition
Advantages of surrogate outcomes
Some surrogates are reliably associates with clinically important outcomes
Surrogates used in everyday clinical practice so clinicians can compare their patients results to the published results
Surrogates less expensive to study
Treatments become available sooner - potentially reducing harm and suffering from a disease
Can see intervention sooner than with outcomes that matter
EBM skills
Locating applicable info
Critically appraise info
Developing focused clinical questions
Locating applicable information
Develop your own research protocol
Develop a search practice that is:
Prospective: in advance - search articles you are interested in
Concurrent: pt comes to office and asks a question
Retrospective: do EBM as a follow up - when patient leaves you can answer question at a later time
Critically appraising information
The process of evaluating trustworthiness and relevance of a resource within the context of a given clinical scenarios
Within a hierarchy of evidence
How to create focused clinical question
PICO
Population - patient
Intervention - treatment
Comparison
Outcome
The EBM process
ASSES the patient, clinical problem
ASK a focused Question
AQUIRE the evidence
APPRAISE the evidence
APPLY: talk with the patient
SELF-EVALUATION
Hierarchy of evidence
As you move up pyramid: stronger methodology, less bias, controls for comparison
Meta-analysis - stringiest Systemic reviews RCT Cohort studies Case control studies Case reports/case series
Levels of evidence
A - high-quality evidence that considers all important outcomes (RCT, systemic reviews of RTCs, meta-analysis, systemic reviews using comprehensive search strategies)
B - anything that is not RCT
C - consensus or expert opinion