Intro Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Copyright

A

protects literary and artistic works (including software)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Trademark

A
- protects signs which are capable of distinguishing the goods or services of
one company (from those of other companies)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Patent

A

Protects inventions

  • √: products, processes, …
  • ≠: laws of nature, algorithms, naturally occurring substances
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Design law

A

Protects innovative shapes of products

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

IP similar rights

A
  • Databases
  • Trade secrets
  • Image rights
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

WIPO

A

Mission: promote the protection of IP rights worldwide and extend the
benefits of the international IP system to all member States (art. 3 i
Convention establishing WIPO 1967)
- Areas: all IP Rights
• Protecting IP through Services
• Resolving Disputes
• Norm Setting

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

WTO

A

International intergovernmental organization
- Mission: provide « the common institutional framework for the conduct of
trade relations among its Members » (art. II para. 1 of the Marrakech
Agreement establishing WTO 1994)
- Three areas (regulated by « Multilateral Trade Agreements »)
• Multilateral Agreements on Trade in Goods (Ann.1A)
• General Agreement on Trade in Services (Ann.1B)
• Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of IP Rights (Ann. 1C)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Law facing the network (internet)

A
  • global use v. local regulation

- new digital assets

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

New legal appoaches

A

law is code

  • code is law
  • law is code
  • commons approach vs proprietary approach
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Principles of International Intellectual Property Law

A
I. National treatment
II. Territoriality
III. Well-known trademark
IV. Exhaustion
V. Exception to protection
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

I. National Treatment

A
A. Notion
- Works originating in one of the member states must be protected in each
member state in the same way that such state protect the works of their
own nationals
- Legal basis
• Art. 5 para. 1 BC
• Art. 2 para. 1 PC
• Art. 3 TRIPS
  • Most favored nation (MFN)
    • MFN and National Treatment : Art. 4 TRIPS
    • MFN and Free Trade Agreement: cf. Free Trade Agreement between
    Switzerland and China (2013)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

II. Territoriality

A
  • An IPR has only effect in the country where it is registered. Beyond this
    country, anyone can use this IPR without authorization
  • Legal basis: Art. 5 para. 2 BC; Art. 6 PC (// 4bis PC)
  • Reminder: global use v. local regulation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q
  1. Industrial property
A

Pursuant to Articles 2 and 3 of the Paris Convention, protection is granted in the case of industrial propertyto natural or legal persons who:
*  are nationals of a Member;
*  are domiciled in a Member; or
*  have real and effective industrial or commercial establishments in a Member.
Pursuant to Article 5 of the IPIC Treaty, similar criteria for determining eligible beneficiaries are applied in
relation to layout-designs or integrated circuits.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q
  1. Copyright and related rights
A

a) Copyright
Pursuant to Articles 3 and 4 of the Berne Convention, protection is granted to authors of literary or artistic works who:
*  are nationals of a Member;
*  have their habitual residence in a Member;
*  have their works first (or simultaneously) published in a Member;
*  are authors of cinematographic works the maker of which has his headquarters or habitual residence in a Member; or
*  are authors of works of architecture erected in a Member or of other artistic works incorporated in a building or other structure located in a Member.

  • b) Performers
    Pursuant to Article 4 of the Rome Convention, protection is granted to performers whose:
  •  performance takes place in another Member;
  •  performance is incorporated in a phonogram as defined below; or
  •  performance is covered by a broadcast as defined below.

Non-discrimination: NationalTreatment and MFN
These principles can be found in Articles 3 to 5of the Agreement.
Non-discrimination is a fundamental principle of theWTO. The principle of non-discrimination has twocomponents: (i) the national treatment principle; and(ii) the most-favoured nation (MFN) principle.
in the context of TRIPS, the subject of protection is “nationals”,which as mentioned before, include natural and legalpersons – who are the owners of the IPRs.

the MFN treatmentclause forbids discrimination among the nationals ofWTO Members. The MFN principle requires to accord tonations of WTO Members any advantage given tonationals of any other country - Member or not of theWTO.

Copy right till person is alive and 50 years more after the death (in some cases it possible to extend this period).
Trade mark 10 years and can be renewal after
Industrial design: The term of protection under industrial design laws is generally five years, with
the possibility of further periods of renewal up to, in most cases, 15 years.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

National treatment:

A

works from a MS must be protected in each member state in the same that such state protects the works of their own nationals (i.e. equal treatment of nationals and foreigners in all MS) (BC Art 5.1, PC Art 2.1, TRIPS Art 3)
- Exception: term of protection for copyright (BC Art 7.8): no national treatment unless reciprocity

  • “Publication” under BC does not take place when interested parties can only take notice of the work; rather, the author must release it for distribution and make it accessible to the public at large (Gold Rush)
  • Posting of a photo on an overseas website is not a simultaneous publication in the US that triggers the need to complete a US copyright registration before suing for infringement (Moberg)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Territoriality:

A

An IP right has effect only in the country where it is registered (PC Art 6, BC Art 5.2)

Copyright protection under Art 3 of BC

  1. Nationality of author
  2. Place of publication of work
  3. “Published” works
  4. “Simultaneously published” works (Gold Rush case)
17
Q

EXCEPTIONS TO TERRITORIALITY

A

Well-known trademark (Art 16.2 TRIPS, PC Art6bis1)

  • Definition of a well-known trademark (WIPO Recommendations)
  • TRIP TRAP Case
18
Q

EXHAUSTION

A

Doctrine of exhaustion achieves an appropriate balance between the interests of the dealer/user and the patent holder (Kodak II)
- To offer consumer protection and facilitate consumer interests and free market for goods while also balancing exploitation rights of the patent holder

  • First sale doctrine: exclusive right of the rightholder to the first commercialization and distribution of a good is exhausted once the product is on the market
    o Only if by the rightholder or with his/her consent
    o Exhausted only in relation to the product, not the IP itself

National exhaustion for PATENTS in Switzerland, Italy, France, and Germany (Kodak II).

International Exhaustion for TRADEMARK in Germany (Kodak II)

EU Regional Exhaustion (Trademark Directive 89/104/ECC Art 7, Copyright Directive 2001/29/ECC Art 4)
- Silhouette case: it’s all EU regional exhaustion. No to Austria wanting to implement international exhaustion. It is not open to MS of the Trademark Directive to provide in their domestic law for international exhaustion in respect of products placed on the market outside the EEA
o Laserdisken: same principle for the Copyright Directive
- Davidoff: the trademark owner can consent to international exhaustion (instead of the usual regional exhaustion in EEA) with an express statement I nteh distribution agreement OR the consent can be implied
- Allposters: even if the copyright of posters has been exhausted by the first sale in the EU with the consent of the copyright owner, the exhaustion does not apply to the modified reproduction of the same image (i.e. no digital exhaustion)

SWITZERLAND:
- Copyright: international exhaustion (ATF 124 III 321, JT 1999 I 423, Nintendo)
- Trademark: international exhaustion (ATF 122 III 469, Chanel)
- Patent: regional exhaustion (national in Kodak, Swiss Patent Act Art 9a al 1 – regional now because part of EEA)
o Justified to treat patents differently because protected for only 20 years but high investment
- Complex products with trademark AND patent: apply the national exhaustion regime only if the patented part is the most significant part of the good (Swiss Patent Act Art 9a al 4)

19
Q

National treatment

A

work originating in 1 member state must be protected in each member state the same way that such state protects the work of their own nationals.

art 5 (1) BC
art 2 (1) PC
art 3 TRIPS
20
Q

Copyright

A

protects literary and artistic work

21
Q

Trademark

A

is the VISIBLE sign, protects signs which are capable of distinguishing the goods or services of one company from other companies

22
Q

Patent

A

is any technical solution to the problem in any field of human activity which is new and it must involve inventive steps and is industrially applicable.

23
Q

MFN

A

Whatever favor, allowance, considerations, privilege or immunity a member state grants to the national of another country, is immediately and unconditionally accorded to nationals of other member states.

24
Q

Design law

A

Protects innovative shapes of product

25
Q

Enforcement of IPRs

A

without it IP law is useless, no natural protection because of intangible (“неосязаемый”, нематериальный, выраженный в правах (об имуществе)
) nature of IPRs

26
Q

what type of Infringement?

A
  1. classical counterfeiting cases
  2. Complex infringement cases
  3. Creative uses
27
Q

What types of enforcement measures?

A
  1. Criminal measures
  2. Administrative measures ( border measures)
  3. Civil measures ( injunctions, seizure, demages)
28
Q

Criminal sanctions

A

art 61 TRIPS
- criminalization limited to TM counterfeiting (= imitation) and copyright piracy (copy)
Conditions
- Willfulness
-commercial scale
sanctions
art 61 TRIPS
1) Remedies available shall include” imprisonment and/or monetary fines sufficient to provide a deterrent effect
2) “ in appropriate cases” seizure, forfeiture, destruction of the infringing goods and of any material.

29
Q

Border measures

A

What ( art 51 -60 TRIPS)
Make available procedure that leads to suspension of release by customs authorities.
Mandatory for trademark & copyright
Conditions
- evidence of prima facie infringement
- detailed description of the goods required

30
Q

Injunction

A

An injunction is a remedy against further injury and the court will not make the order if satisfied that no such injury is likely to occur
- stop the injury before it happened and deter

Damages look to the past and are designed to compensate the plaintiff for the harm inflicted on him. The injunction look to the future.

31
Q

Preliminary injunction

A

Urgency justifies an order at an early stage (injury likely to occur: the purpose of a preliminary is not to conclude the merits of the controversy, but merely to preserve the status quo until a more considered decision on the merits is possible.

A plaintiff seeking a preliminary injunction must establish that he is likely to succeed on the merits that he is likely to suffer irreparable harm in the absence of preliminary relief, that the native of equities tips in his favor, and that an injunction is in the public interest.

32
Q

Permanent injunction

A

The plaintiff must demonstrate 1 that it has suffered an irreparable injury 2 that remedies available at law are inadequate to compensate for that injury and 3 that the public interest would not be disserved by a permanent injunction.

33
Q

How to protect the alleged infringers

A
  • Provision of security by the applicant for preliminary injunction art 50 :3 TRIPS
  • Liability for damages in case of an unjustified preliminary injunction art 50:7 TRIPS
34
Q

Territoriality

A

It is often said that intellectual property (IP) rights are territorial in nature. This territoriality principle has several distinct dimensions on the level of substantive IP law, private international law and international conventions. Whereas it is true that there are examples of an overly rigid territorial thinking, in particular as regards jurisdiction concerning foreign IP rights, one can also observe an opposite trend towards unilateral expansions of national jurisdiction to overcome the territorial limits of IP law. Namely, the local IP regime is applied extraterritorially to activity occurring in other territories.

This article identifies the loophole in the territoriality principle, which allows for extraterritoriality in the first place. It then outlines relevant examples taken from the patent, copyright and trademark laws of different countries, predominantly from U.S. and German legislation and court practice. These examples are classified into two groups, depending on the primary purpose of the provision in question. Inbound regulation concerns situations in which a territory is shielded from spillover effects stemming from extraterritorial activities. The outbound regulation aims at enforcing the local IP regime with regard to activities and effects in foreign territories. The concluding section explains why unilateral “extraterritorial” deserves as much scrutiny as does an overly rigid “territorialism”.

35
Q

fair use in US

A

Examples of fair use in United States copyright law include commentary, search engines, criticism, parody, news reporting, research, and scholarship. Fair use provides for the legal, unlicensed citation or incorporation of copyrighted material in another author’s work under a four-factor test.

36
Q

four-factor test.

A

Legal tests are various kinds of commonly applied methods of evaluation used to resolve matters of jurisprudence.[1] In the context of a trial, a hearing, discovery, or other kinds of legal proceedings, the resolution of certain questions of fact or law may hinge on the application of one or more legal tests.

Legal tests are often formulated from the logical analysis of a judicial decision or a court order where it appears that a finder of fact or the court made a particular decision after contemplating a well-defined set of circumstances. It is assumed that evaluating any given set of circumstances under a legal test will lead to an unambiguous and repeatable result.

37
Q

Fair use

A
  1. the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;
  2. the nature of the copyrighted work;
  3. the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and
  4. the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.
38
Q

A complainant in a UDRP proceeding must establish three elements to succeed:

A

The domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights;
The registrant does not have any rights or legitimate interests in the domain name; and
The domain name has been registered and the domain name is being used in “bad faith”.

39
Q

In a UDRP proceeding, a panel will consider several non-exclusive factors to assess bad faith, such as:

A

Whether the registrant registered the domain name primarily for the purpose of selling, renting, or otherwise transferring the domain name registration to the complainant who is the owner of the trademark or service mark;
Whether the registrant registered the domain name to prevent the owner of the trademark or service mark from reflecting the mark in a corresponding domain name, if the domain name owner has engaged in a pattern of such conduct; and
Whether the registrant registered the domain name primarily for the purpose of disrupting the business of a competitor; or
Whether by using the domain name, the registrant has intentionally attempted to attract, for commercial gain, internet users to the registrant’s website, by creating a likelihood of confusion with the complainant’s mark.