Interventional Study Design Flashcards

1
Q

Interventional Retrospective

A

Post hoc analysis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Interventional Prospective

A

Controlled trials

Uncontrolled trials

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Interventional

A

Investigator ASSIGNS TREATMENT

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Observational

A

Treatment is predetermined

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Ultimate goal of clinical trials

A

Establish causality
If X then Y
If you give the pt this antibiotic then their infection will resolve
If you do not give the antibiotic then their infection will not resolve

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Research Question

A

FINER
Feasible, interesting, novel, ethical, relevant
PRIOR to start of study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Background and significance

A
Why is it worthwhile?
What is already known?
What is unclear?
What needs to be answered?
Is it beneficial?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Placebo controlled trials indicated when:

A

No standard therapy available
Pts aware of placebo control and odds of receiving placebo
Placebo may be added to the standard therapy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Effective Controls

A

Proper matching
Same appearance, smell, taste
Comparable dose, regimen, duration
Unmasking: accidental or deliberate (safety concern)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Placebo effect

A

Some kind of intervention = real or preceived positive negative effects “nocebo”
Effects are also possible even if they know they are receiving placebo
Linked to EXPECTATIONS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Hawthorne effect (observer bias)

A

Subjects enrolled in a study change their behavior in response to the study itself (exercise when they normal don’t, etc)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Pygmalion effect (expectancy advantage)

A

Investigator’s expectations of an advantage in one group vs another affects subject response

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Why Randomize

A

Minimize bias
Comparable groups
Uncertainty of benefits of a therapy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Randomization Methods

A

Fixed randomization methods

Adaptive randomization methods

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Fixed Randomization Methods

A

Simple, block, stratified

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Adaptive randomization methods

A

Allocation probabilities change as study progress in order to address imbalances that arise

17
Q

Simple Randomization

A

Participants randomly and equally assigned
Simple and easy
Potentially imbalanced

18
Q

Block Randomization

A

Avoids large imbalances from occurring throughout the study period
Can lead to selection bias
Double bind = no bias

19
Q

Stratified Randomization

A

Smaller study
Stratify pts by variables of concern at baseline ensures comparability btwn grps for that factor
A: ensures even distribution, increases power, balancing only 2-3 baseline variables
D: Large numbers

20
Q

Define Selection Bias

A

Sample not representative of the population due to pt selection methods

21
Q

Define Sample Bias

A

Sample does not reflect the spectrum of characteristics in the target population

22
Q

Define Informational bias

A

Differences in the way that information collected in study occurs

23
Q

Define study design/analysis bias

A

Unfair comparisons

Fail to take into account confounders

24
Q

Control bias

A

Randomization

Blinding

25
Q

Parallel Group Pro

A

Well controlled
Well defined population
Bias and error limited
Well known statistical tools

26
Q

Parallel Group Cons

A

Expensive
Need a large number of subjects
Volunteer bias
Loss to followup

27
Q

Crossover Design Pros

A

Difference based upon within subject comparisons (less variability and fewer subjects)
Easier
Subjects must be on meds all times
Good for short-acting drugs, stable/chronic diseases, bioequivalent studies

28
Q

Crossover Design Cons

A

Not useful for acute or permanent endpoints
Carry over effect
Exaggerated efficacy of second treatment