Interventional Study Design Flashcards

1
Q

Interventional Retrospective

A

Post hoc analysis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Interventional Prospective

A

Controlled trials

Uncontrolled trials

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Interventional

A

Investigator ASSIGNS TREATMENT

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Observational

A

Treatment is predetermined

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Ultimate goal of clinical trials

A

Establish causality
If X then Y
If you give the pt this antibiotic then their infection will resolve
If you do not give the antibiotic then their infection will not resolve

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Research Question

A

FINER
Feasible, interesting, novel, ethical, relevant
PRIOR to start of study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Background and significance

A
Why is it worthwhile?
What is already known?
What is unclear?
What needs to be answered?
Is it beneficial?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Placebo controlled trials indicated when:

A

No standard therapy available
Pts aware of placebo control and odds of receiving placebo
Placebo may be added to the standard therapy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Effective Controls

A

Proper matching
Same appearance, smell, taste
Comparable dose, regimen, duration
Unmasking: accidental or deliberate (safety concern)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Placebo effect

A

Some kind of intervention = real or preceived positive negative effects “nocebo”
Effects are also possible even if they know they are receiving placebo
Linked to EXPECTATIONS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Hawthorne effect (observer bias)

A

Subjects enrolled in a study change their behavior in response to the study itself (exercise when they normal don’t, etc)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Pygmalion effect (expectancy advantage)

A

Investigator’s expectations of an advantage in one group vs another affects subject response

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Why Randomize

A

Minimize bias
Comparable groups
Uncertainty of benefits of a therapy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Randomization Methods

A

Fixed randomization methods

Adaptive randomization methods

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Fixed Randomization Methods

A

Simple, block, stratified

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Adaptive randomization methods

A

Allocation probabilities change as study progress in order to address imbalances that arise

17
Q

Simple Randomization

A

Participants randomly and equally assigned
Simple and easy
Potentially imbalanced

18
Q

Block Randomization

A

Avoids large imbalances from occurring throughout the study period
Can lead to selection bias
Double bind = no bias

19
Q

Stratified Randomization

A

Smaller study
Stratify pts by variables of concern at baseline ensures comparability btwn grps for that factor
A: ensures even distribution, increases power, balancing only 2-3 baseline variables
D: Large numbers

20
Q

Define Selection Bias

A

Sample not representative of the population due to pt selection methods

21
Q

Define Sample Bias

A

Sample does not reflect the spectrum of characteristics in the target population

22
Q

Define Informational bias

A

Differences in the way that information collected in study occurs

23
Q

Define study design/analysis bias

A

Unfair comparisons

Fail to take into account confounders

24
Q

Control bias

A

Randomization

Blinding

25
Parallel Group Pro
Well controlled Well defined population Bias and error limited Well known statistical tools
26
Parallel Group Cons
Expensive Need a large number of subjects Volunteer bias Loss to followup
27
Crossover Design Pros
Difference based upon within subject comparisons (less variability and fewer subjects) Easier Subjects must be on meds all times Good for short-acting drugs, stable/chronic diseases, bioequivalent studies
28
Crossover Design Cons
Not useful for acute or permanent endpoints Carry over effect Exaggerated efficacy of second treatment