Intervention artic/phono Flashcards
What factors contribute to generalisation?
- Relationship among sounds
- Stimulability
- Phonological knowledge
- Consistency of error
- Homonymy or not?
- Real or non words
- Factors within the child
What is generalisation?
The extension of learning or improvement in skills beyond treated sounds/words.
- Local – use of treated sound in untreated words e.g. use of /k/ in other /k/ words or in words with /k/ in other positions
- Within-class – affects sounds that are in same class as treated sound – e.g. worked on /s/, but improvement in /f/ as well
- Across-class – change occurs in unrelated sounds or patterns
How does the relationship among sounds impact generalisation?
Teaching a sound at a complex level to generalise to less complex sounds. Eg. teaching /v/ to get /f/ and /s/ blends to get /s/.
How does the stimulabilty impact generalisation?
A child’s ability to correctly imitate a phoneme given cues Indicates underlying phonological knowledge about the sound Prognostic sign – ‘dynamic assessment’
Implications for treatment planning
Positively associated with greater visibility of sound, older age of child, higher speech imitation abilities
How does phonological knowledge impact generalisation?
Generalisation greater for sounds for which child had relatively most knowledge
– BUT….. If treatment began with sounds for which child had ‘least phonological knowledge’ (i.e., didn’t say at all), generalisation occurred across system (as for previous comment on more complex sounds
How does stimulability impact generalisation?
Appears to be no advantage in targeting a sound which seems to be ‘emerging’ i.e. that the child uses sometimes
More generalisation if targeted sound is consistently in error So…. target sounds NOT in inventory
How does homonymy impact generalisation?
Found that non-homonymous treatment approach led to greater accuracies of treated sounds than homonymous approaches Homonymy was not a precipitator of phonological change
How do real words vs non words affect generalisation?
Generalisation was greater for nonwords than for real words.
How do child factors impact generalisation?
Motivation of child/family
Use of parental monitoring
Child’s self monitoring
Child’s perception of practice – should it happen outside of therapy room? - ↑ focus on sounds themselves within therapy room, ↓ focus on meaningful communication
What are some of the factors in making good therapy materials?
Critical features of good therapy materials/activities :- mobility construction destruction movement of material / activity completion flexibility surprise competition
Also consider: safety, age appropriateness, expense, child’s interests, type of material (real vs picture).
What are linguistic based approaches to therapy?
Linguistic approach to phonological remediation involves the establishment of sound contrasts.
Phonemic contrasts can be minimal (bus-but) or maximal (bus/buck/bug)
Typically include some motoric aspects (although this not always defined
What are distinctive feature approaches?
Aim to establish a distinctive feature that is lacking in a child’s repertoire eg. +continuant, +voiced, -anterior
Focus on establishment of feature through teaching a sound containing that feature, (since features are sub-phonemic units of sounds and cannot be taught independently)
Assume that established feature will generalise from exemplar to other members of sound class in which feature is absent eg. +continuant generalises from target /f/ to /Ɵ/, /s/, and /ʃ/. generalisation is influenced by the similarity between the sound targeted and other sound errors eg. generalisation occurs most rapidly across similar sounds or within sound classes. the more features two sound segments share, the more potential for generalisation to occur
What are advantages/disadvantage of distinctive feature approach?
Advantages
targets phonological patterns that may underlie several individual errors
useful with substitutions
Disadvantages
some sounds produced by children with a phonological disorder can’t be easily described within this framework
Cannot use to describe omissions or distortions
Which client groups benefit from distinctive feature therapy most?
Client who does not use phonemes contrastively
NOT clients who display large number of sounds distortions and omissions