Interactionist Labelling Theory Of Crime Flashcards
Howard Becker - no such thing as a deviant act
Crime is a product of social interactions: in a low income neighbourhood, a fight is more likely to be defined by the police as evidence of delinquency but in a wealthy neighbourhood as evidence of being highsprung
Deviance amplification
Being labelled as deviant can lead to deviance amplification because this label can become our master status - the main way in which we think of and identify ourselves
2015 survey
Survey of 2000 people , the average person in Britain breaks the law 17 times a year with 63% admitting to speeding, 33% stealing and 25% taking illegal drugs
Becker - stop and search
Those who are stopped and searched in the street are disproportionately young men who are unemployed or casually employed
Cicourel 1968
Definitions of criminality can be negotiated by some groups. He observed that when arrested, a middle class youth was less likely to be charged with a criminal offence than a working class youth because his social background doesn’t fit the polices stereotypical view of a typical delinquent
Consequences of labelling
Becker - the deviant may be forced to seek the company of those similarly labelled and to become part of a deviant subculture. This increases the potential for a self fulfilling prophecy because the membership of the subculture may offer the individual opportunities to reoffend
Lemert
Emphasised the importance of social reaction and distinguished between primary and secondary deviation
Primary deviation - consisting of deviant acts before they are publically labelled
Secondary = response of the individual or the group to societal reaction
He believes societal reaction to be the major cause of deviance
Moral entrepreneurs -Becker
Laws are the reflection of the activities of people who actively seek to create and enforce rules and laws , they do this to benefit themselves , they believe that the laws benefit society
Moral entrepreneurs may be news editors, MPs, religious readers or individuals who start a campaign
Deviancy amplification- young
Carried out research into the hippie marijuana uses in Notting hill:
Police began targeting a group of hippies which served To widen the gap between them and convention of society. This resulted in drug taking becoming a symbol of the groups deviance against the police
This consequently caused a deviant subculture to develop and the hippies to internalise their label and become marginalised from society
Stan Cohen 1972
Researched the fights which took place mainly in English seaside resorts on bank holidays between two youth subcultures ( mixture of content analysis, interviews and observation)
Folk devils- when the media reports on deviant behaviour they construct a narrative which features a clear villain e.g the violent youth subcultures
Moral panics - the exaggerated reaction of the media meant that the police responded to future conflict more forcefully and thus created further conflicts
Criticisms of Stan Cohen
Cohen’s formulation of moral panic theory assumes that the audience are passive , but audiences today are much more active and able to critically evaluate media content
Evaluation : Akers and Sellers
The deviant act is always more important than the societal reaction to it . Deviants know that what they are doing is wrong even if their acts go undiscovered
Evaluation : too deterministic
Heavily implies that labelling inevitably leads to a deviant career and it doesn’t account for free will, choice or reduction in deviance due to societal reaction
Labelling Theory applied to education
Within schools, Howard Becker argued that middle class teachers have an idea of an ideal pupil that is middle class.