interactionism and labelling theory Flashcards
what is top-down macro?
- argue that ideas are shaped by society - society is top-down and individuals are puppets and created by society
- focus on how institutions create and control us
- positivist
- functionalism: behavior is shaped, and controlled by shared norms, beliefs and values
- marxism: social class relations
- feminism: gender relations
what is ‘bottoms-up’ micro?
- interactionism focuses on small scale studies
- looks at how individuals make sense of what is going on around them
- individuals develop meanings which influence the way they behave
- interpretivist
- labelling theory
BECKER: labelling theory
- crime is a product of interactions between suspects and the police/courts
- typically, those with power to the labelling
what is the social construction of crime?
- deviance is not the quality of the act the person commits - relates more to who get labelled as a deviant
- society creates rules - deviance is behavior that breaks these rules
- heroin addict / compared to a nurse injecting a patient. same behavior yet a status change.
what are moral entrepreneurs (BECKER)
- BECKER sees these as groups who construct deviance
- these lead moral crusades to change laws
- new laws create new groups of outsiders - those who break the laws
- new laws cause the expansion of the social control agencies (police+courts) to enforce these laws and impose labels on offenders
PLATT - juvenile delinquents
- PLATT: the term juvenile delinquency was created by victorian middle class moral entrepreneurs aimed at protecting young people at risk
- this established juevniles as a seperate offender with their own courts
- the state expanded its powers to go beyond criminal offences and include status offences
- this means young people became criminals simply because of their age e.g. truancy, sexual promiscuity
AARON CICOUREL - participant observation results
- CICIOUREL participent observation whilst working as a juvenile probation officer found that the police held a stereotypical view of a juvenile delinquent
- police used TYPIFICATION: stereotypes of what a typical criminal is like
- usually WC youths which led to intense policing of WC areas
- criminal justic system also reflected this bias
- MC youths generally let off
- these arrests then became crime statistics
who gets labelled and arrested?
- not everyone who commits a crime is punished
based on:
- their interactions with agents of social control police and courts
- their appearance and background
- the situation and the offence
social construction of crime statistics
- interactionists argue that official stats are social constructions
- based on a process of decisions and negotiations
- outcome depends on the labels attached to individuals
- the dark figure of crime (iceberg effect) nobody knows for certain the true level of crime
- alternative statistics still have limitations
ways to measure crime
- crime statistics: number of convictions
- victim survey: more valid, but some victims may not be truthful
- self-report study: more valid but some people could lie/exaggerate
the use of crime statistics
- CICOUREL’s study shows crime statistics don’t reveal a valid picture of crime
- sociologists can’t use them as a study resource - not factual
- they tell us more about how the agents of social control operate: who gets arrested/prosecuted
stages in the social construct of crime:
STAGE ONE: sentenced by police
STAGE TWO: arrested
STAGE THREE: charged
STAGE FOUR: prosecuted
STAGE FIVE: convicted
STAGE SIX: sentenced
EDWIN LEMERT: primary deviance
acts that are not publicly labelled - little significance e.g. drugs, speeding and litter dropping
EDWIN LEMERT: secondary deviance
is publicly labelled and relates to public relation
EDWIN LEMERT: master status
label successfully applied so all their other qualities are irrelevant